OK. Let's put it this way. If I had invested in the Indian economy in the 1970s I would have enjoyed consistent, increasing investment growth over a fifty year period to its current rate of more than 7% pa. Going forward (virus permitting) we are talking about reaching trade agreements with expansive, high growth economies with innovative ideas, momentum, mostly English speaking, tax friendly with limited restrictions.
Just to correct your figures, France has a current GDP of $2400 billion, which is significantly smaller than India's. However, if I understand the point of this thread it is whether the UK will strike a trade deal with the US and, if so, whether it will be much better than the existing WTO arrangements or whether the UK would be better off striking trade deals with emerging African and Asian countries. The opinion I gave above is that we won't reach a trade deal with the US for a while and that I agree with Lord Marland's view that the UK should instead concentrate on global expansion. We already have healthy trading arrangements with the USA and a trade deal would not be worth as much as the expansion mentioned above. We also have a trade deal with France and the EU so references to France's economy are not relevant to this.
If you disagree and believe that the UK should go all out for a US trade deal, then say so. It doesn't look like Biden is ready or even willing to reach any deal with us but if he does will it have conditions we can't agree with and will it earn us substantially more than the lucrative trading arrangements we have with them already?