Search results

Well, on to 5pm tomorrow and how the table looks then. One thing for sure and that is the players shouldn't need a team talk tomorrow and NC shouldn't need any second invitation to go hell for leather. We can beat the teams above, we know that, so just bluddy go and do it!

31-2

You have to feel a little bit for the Tory councillors who do a decent enough job in this part of FY8 at least getting totally let down by this power abuser. I'm sure there will be votes against as a result come May. I'm no Tory btw just being fair.

I was ripped off then.

Think it was £2 in.

Snooker. Falcon had one too.

At least they abandoned the idea of just using a coin toss up until the semi's which would have eliminated the need to play. Or have they.......

Only during WWII

WOT!!! Free access to the ballroom? Grrrrrrr

Agree. Reading this thread it's bell end to bell end 🤣

I think NC was being the perfect gentlemen and not wanting to make the other team look poor.

Still a long way to go. I must admit I expected 1 result to go for us last night and 1 against. We need quite a few more like that. Do it though and anything can happen. Deffo more likely than this time yesterday.

Hopefully not.

With us it's about losing games that really were winnable. Not losing by luck, ref's decisions or whatever, but losing at 2pm with team selection, then losing again with set up and team talk. Allowing for the luck side I reckon a different manager would have gained another 10/12 points more...

The closest NC will get to raw meat is an errm without the leg.

100% spot on. Players would run through brick walls for him. I vividly recall a promotion showdown v BC which we won 1-0. Terry Cooper, the BC manager was interviewed after the game and a comment from him was 'what does he (BA) feed the players, raw meat?'

Actually, thinking about it, they can have 2 draws and a loss.

I see what you mean. They could be pipped by 1 goal. They'll come for a draw Sat and rely on the counter. I did say realistically though as we won't win both.

Realistically Barnsley only need a point from 3 games and Oxford 3 from 3. I'd be amazed if both don't manage that.

In part because they are NC's mates. Part because it would make NC (and SS) look like a failure. It's beyond me why NC Mk1 needed an exp. No 2 soon after being hired, yet Mk2 didn't? Bizarre.