Search results

I posted on here primarily to correct the misleading statements Plumbs made about the history and current position of the status of regional groups in the FSA rules as well as other issues. I don't think that on any reading my posts could be described as aggressive in any way but I'm happy for...

Whether deliberately or otherwise you have misrepresented the position. The rule which you quoted higher up states "the organisation must publish annual accounts which are audited or certified annual accounts or, if annual income and expenditure do not exceed £100, a simple written statement and...

That's a pre-merger document produced by Supporters Direct, not the FSA. It has a lot of very good stuff in there, but it is misleading to present having a supporters director on each Board as the "real agenda" of the FSA, although of course it would be very good if that were to happen. Why...

You've made a subtle little change here from "FSA" to "FSF/SD". James Mathie never worked for the FSA. He worked for SD (Supporters Direct) but left before the merger in 2018, so the meetings you refer to are at least 3 years old. That of course also means I can't ask him whether your account of...

SLOs are appointed by football clubs, certainly not the FSA. The phrase "from the FSA" has no meaning in this context. If an SLO is a member of the FSA, then fine. If they are an active member, even better. We'd be crazy not to welcome that, for obvious reasons. The allegation that we have a...

Understood - it was your phrase "good luck with your quest for justice " which led me to believe that you accepted that there has been some sort of injustice which needs correcting relating to this FSA constitutional matter which "Plumbs" has chosen to raise on this Board, and in so doing...

It is a pity that my first foray onto this forum should be about an FSA constitutional matter, rather than one of the big issues facing the game and its fans today but in view of the fact that my signature has been reproduced above as some sort of "evidence" and you appear to have accepted that...