AndrewDuncanSmith
Well-known member
This couple are becoming a tad tiresome and boring
His mother's brother is gingerWhat about the Ginger hair?
Anyone else in the Royal Family got it?
We know that almost certainly Diane was his mother.His mother's brother is ginger
Abuse? You of all people I'd expect to choose your words wisely, but he certainly isn't abusing anyone.the abuse he's dishing out to the monarchy, his parents and grandparents just makes you wonder whether he's become privileged to certain info that he didn't know about whilst he was growing up.
How are they boring and tiresome? If you don't give a fuck? This is what I fail to understand.This couple are becoming a tad tiresome and boring
Yep, spot on. He's a ginger whinger.His dad very publicly had an open affair and shows no remorse at all for any problems it caused.
His mother spent her 20’s with glaring physical/mental health issues - bulemia- and died when he was a kid.
As he’s grown up, people have quite publicly and with zero thought for what it might do to him, questioned his parentage with a focus on who his dead mother might have slept with.
But I reckon you lot are right. He’s a right mardy arse, who should stop being a ginger whinger.
He can whinge all he likes, and I no doubt suspect he hasn’t had an easy childhood. But the hypocrisy is of trying to hold onto the royal titles and making a fortune off them is the issue I have, and many others.His dad very publicly had an open affair and shows no remorse at all for any problems it caused.
His mother spent her 20’s with glaring physical/mental health issues - bulemia- and died when he was a kid.
As he’s grown up, people have quite publicly and with zero thought for what it might do to him, questioned his parentage with a focus on who his dead mother might have slept with.
But I reckon you lot are right. He’s a right mardy arse, who should stop being a ginger whinger.
To be fair, the posters on here who seek sanctuary in ‘free speech’ when they’ve posted their crap are usually bonkersNow apparantly calling the US 1st Amendment 'Bonkers'. Hasn't gone too well over the pond.
I fully agree regarding the ‘cake and eating it’ angle. All famous people who don’t like press intrusion have a choice open to them, to remove themselves from the media glare.He can whinge all he likes, and I no doubt suspect he hasn’t had an easy childhood. But the hypocrisy is of trying to hold onto the royal titles and making a fortune off them is the issue I have, and many others.
The hypocrisy of declaring that your mental health is suffering from the media inclusion in his life then courting it for financial gain like there is no tomorrow.
Nobody wants him to be unwell, but he’s not entirely stupid enough to see that his behaviour and that of his wife is hypocritical.
Writing a book for personal financial gain and splashing ‘by the Duchess of Sussex ‘ across the front is totally hilarious to be honest.
Whose to say who is right SATW but we are all allowed our valid opinions.
That’s not my default position. Rich and privileged doesn’t prevent mental health issues and I have empathy for him in that respect.I fully agree regarding the ‘cake and eating it’ angle. All famous people who don’t like press intrusion have a choice open to them, to remove themselves from the media glare.
But there’s also a huge lack of awareness or empathy for what he’s been through as a person and how that will have shaped his view on the world. The default position is that he’s rich and privileged and should shut his mouth.
says you!To be fair, the posters on here who seek sanctuary in ‘free speech’ when they’ve posted their crap are usually bonkers
On this thread you've only used hypocrisy and hypocritical 378 times. You need to use it moreHe can whinge all he likes, and I no doubt suspect he hasn’t had an easy childhood. But the hypocrisy is of trying to hold onto the royal titles and making a fortune off them is the issue I have, and many others.
The hypocrisy of declaring that your mental health is suffering from the media inclusion in his life then courting it for financial gain like there is no tomorrow.
Nobody wants him to be unwell, but he’s not entirely stupid enough to see that his behaviour and that of his wife is hypocritical.
Writing a book for personal financial gain and splashing ‘by the Duchess of Sussex ‘ across the front is totally hilarious to be honest.
Whose to say who is right SATW but we are all allowed our valid opinions.
That’s because I really mean it and I’ll keep using it till people get itOn this thread you've only used hypocrisy and hypocritical 378 times. You need to use it more
Didn’t say it was yours, but it’s one taken by many.That’s not my default position. Rich and privileged doesn’t prevent mental health issues and I have empathy for him in that respect.
No sympathies for the backlash he gets for his hypocrisy though.
I don't understand your point?Of course everyone seems to be only listening to one side of the story which was printed on the front page of the Sun newspaper yesterday. It’s a good job theres a certain amount of balance being applied here. I’m also really pleased Harry’s new found peaceful life stretched to a front page article in a British Red top
His Grandad, he looks quite a lot like him.What about the Ginger hair?
Anyone else in the Royal Family got it?
The vast majority of us would have been ecstatic to have the wealth they had when they left the U.K., complaining that the firm had cut them off from the gravy train.This thread is like the Daily Mail comments section!
Good on Harry and Megan. The "new" Royals and global celebrities. Hope they coin it in for all it's worth. At least they are earning it themselves.