BigHandsOliverKahn
Well-known member
Leicester born Che Adams this time. He's even played for England U20's before now. What is the point of international football?
It’s bonkers.Leicester born Che Adams this time. He's even played for England U20's before now. What is the point of international football?
No to be fair to him he once sang Auld Lang Syne one New Years EveIt’s bonkers.
What’s the qualifying criteria here?
“Have you ever eaten haggis or tatties?”
“What’s that? You have”.
“You’re in!”
Nah!Yep, Cricket is the worst for this.
Well they should have picked her then.Don't see the issue happens in all sport know one gives a hoot with Jofra Archer playing for England Cricket and he's lived here two minutes.
Che's Grandmother is Scottish and let's be honest this has been happening for years.
Can you ever debate anything properly if you want a rule change say it not single out one player because he scored last night there are thousands of examples in all sports.Well they should have picked her then.
Agree, what IS the point?Leicester born Che Adams this time. He's even played for England U20's before now. What is the point of international football?
I have provided plenty of examples before. Wales were reliant on multiple English born players when they did well at the last World Cup. Almost all of their goals were scored by English players in those finals.Can you ever debate anything properly if you want a rule change say it not single out one player because he scored last night there are thousands of examples in all sports.
So what are you exactly debating where a player is born,who they have represented at youth level or their ancestry and the potential to play for another country?I have provided plenty of examples before. Wales were reliant on multiple English born players when they did well at the last World Cup. Almost all of their goals were scored by English players in those finals.
Examples add weight to debates so will be used.
You should play for the country you were born. One possible exception to the birth rule - the country you lived in the longest as a child up to the age of 18 when you became an adult.So what are you exactly debating where a player is born,who they have represented at youth level or their ancestry and the potential to play for another country?
Just from last night Rahem Stirling born Jamaica and Declan Rice youth level with Ireland played for England same as many others in the past.
The bit you haven't convinced me of, is why that would be a bad thing?You should play for the country you were born. One possible exception to the birth rule - the country you lived in the longest as a child up to the age of 18 when you became an adult.
Ban picking and choosing as an adult, ban when you've represented one country at any level as an adult, ban selecting based on your granny or grandad who you might never have even met. All of those need banning otherwise international football is not a competition between nationals of each nation.
The downside of that is if it forces a players hand at a young age we could have lost out on Grealish and Rice but I do agree with you.You should play for the country you were born. One possible exception to the birth rule - the country you lived in the longest as a child up to the age of 18 when you became an adult.
Ban picking and choosing as an adult, ban when you've represented one country at any level as an adult, ban selecting based on your granny or grandad who you might never have even met. All of those need banning otherwise international football is not a competition between nationals of each nation.
Grealish and Rice were both offered the chance to play for Ireland (and both got some disgusting abuse for it) but decided they wanted to play for England because they'd been brought up supporting and wanting England to win, and just because they have Irish ancestry, England are still their team.The downside of that is if it forces a players hand at a young age we could have lost out on Grealish and Rice but I do agree with you.
Lots of people will have similar backgrounds to Grealish and Rice, I think Harry Kanes father is Irish so he could've gone the same way aswell!Grealish and Rice were both offered the chance to play for Ireland (and both got some disgusting abuse for it) but decided they wanted to play for England because they'd been brought up supporting and wanting England to win, and just because they have Irish ancestry, England are still their team.
Maybe it's just me but I could NEVER play for another country, in fact I have never wear another country's shirt, I remember all those goons walking around in Argentina and Brazil shirts after they'd won a World Cup, they should have been birched in the stocks in Poulton.
The very essence of international football is being compromised. You cannot know today if a proper Scottish team would have beaten the Faroes last night because they didn't pick a team of Scots.The bit you haven't convinced me of, is why that would be a bad thing?
Parent yes but I'm not sure that it should extend to grandparents.I think Blood parent or grandparent is a fair enough rule.
Is that the same as some a fast bowler who can't get in the England team because Jofra Archer is in their way or a rugby union player because Manu Tuilagi is in the side and that's the problem you can't just single out football above other sports.The very essence of international football is being compromised. You cannot know today if a proper Scottish team would have beaten the Faroes last night because they didn't pick a team of Scots.
Also, what about all the genuine Scottish players on the fringe of playing for their country who don't then get the chance because some English players have been drafted in?
This is a football site so only kept it to that but other sports can be a joke too, not least cricket.Is that the same as some a fast bowler who can't get in the England team because Jofra Archer is in their way or a rugby union player because Manu Tuilagi is in the side and that's the problem you can't just single out football above other sports.
Take Ray Houghton a legend with Ireland but born in Glasgow gave his all for the country and the Irish love him the French had Marcel Desailly(Ghana) the Germans Lukas Poldolski(Poland),Spanish Diego Costa(Brazil) Italians Roberto Di Matteo(Switzerland) so every country uses the rules of residency or family members to get them in the team and their are thousands of cases so to single out Scotland when it happens everywhere in International football didn't Big Ben Burgess represent Rep of Ireland cough.
I think about this way, your grandad - your dads dad is a Scot, his mum English, your dad having been brought up by a Scotsman will feel a little bit Scottish even if he leans towards England by birth/mum. He will along with grandads influence pass that to his son, who by right has therefore a Scottish heritage.Parent yes but I'm not sure that it should extend to grandparents.
Not sure if it's enough, born in England, parents born in England, 3 grandparents born in England, 1 grandparent born in Scotland. Personally I wouldn't feel very Scottish but if I wasn't wanted by England and Scotland asked me to play for them I'm sure I would.I think about this way, your grandad - your dads dad is a Scot, his mum English, your dad having been brought up by a Scotsman will feel a little bit Scottish even if he leans towards England by birth/mum. He will along with grandads influence pass that to his son, who by right has therefore a Scottish heritage.
Don't see the issue happens in all sport know one gives a hoot with Jofra Archer playing for England Cricket and he's lived here two minutes.
Che's Grandmother is Scottish and let's be honest this has been happening for years.
Do you want to borrow some of these?Don't see the issue happens in all sport know one gives a hoot with Jofra Archer playing for England Cricket and he's lived here two minutes.
Che's Grandmother is Scottish and let's be honest this has been happening for years.