Wasn't the EFL Chief Executive supportive of the Big Project?The EFL will embrace the Government’s fan-led review and confirm we will contribute fully to help shape any decisions taken and ensure they are made in the best interests of supporters and the Clubs that we represent.
Never thought I'd see that in print
Refreshing change
Theres been a number of initiatives over the years but we've come to a pinch point I think. The important thing from my perspective is that ALL fans must be consulted because the Trusts have their own agenda, and that unfortunately excludes many other supporters.Wasn't the EFL Chief Executive supportive of the Big Project?
I don’t recall Malcolm Clarke pursuing you to be honest.Theres been a number of initiatives over the years but we've come to a pinch point I think. The important thing from my perspective is that ALL fans must be consulted because the Trusts have their own agenda, and that unfortunately excludes many other supporters.
You've see that with the way @Malcolm Clarke has pursued me on here.
He all of a sudden appeared on this forum which was clearly prompted, and everything I had posted was based on experience from treatment from his group. People are entitled to an opinion even when it doesn't follow the narrative.I don’t recall Malcolm Clarke pursuing you to be honest.
I think he was just replying to some of your allegations which he felt were completely groundless.
I’m going from memory but didn’t you name him? Or attach a document with his name on it?He all of a sudden appeared on this forum which was clearly prompted, and everything I had posted was based on experience from treatment from his group. People are entitled to an opinion even when it doesn't follow the narrative.
If he is part of a document thats available in the public domain then its his problem, a bit like BRR whinging about the same thing when he was elected to the role of divisional rep.I’m going from memory but didn’t you name him? Or attach a document with his name on it?
And as far as I can recall he just set out his response to the allegations you’d made. As you say everyone is entitled to an opinion and, provided they don’t cross any lines, has the right to express it.
But if he doesn’t agree with what you say, or your version of events, then he’s allowed to reply and say he doesn’t agree? Yes?If he is part of a document thats available in the public domain then its his problem, a bit like BRR whinging about the same thing when he was elected to the role of divisional rep.
If you can't stand the heat etc...
He can say what he wants but outing someone (against forum rules too) is out of order. Its also the work of a bully which from my experience is how Trusts tend to operate with the FSA top table being no different.But if he doesn’t agree with what you say, or your version of events, then he’s allowed to reply and say he doesn’t agree? Yes?