Come on all you Yaxley-Lennon supporters

Ollygon

Well-known member
Our hero has just lost a court case and been ordered to pay £100,000 in damages to a Syrian schoolboy.

He needs fundraising to help with this. I'm happy to chip in an old italian 1 lira coin.

Any other offers?
 
Our hero has just lost a court case and been ordered to pay £100,000 in damages to a Syrian schoolboy.

He needs fundraising to help with this. I'm happy to chip in an old italian 1 lira coin.

Any other offers?
I would rather leave the 1 lira coin in the Whiskey bottle!
 
Our hero has just lost a court case and been ordered to pay £100,000 in damages to a Syrian schoolboy.

He needs fundraising to help with this. I'm happy to chip in an old italian 1 lira coin.

Any other offers?
I take it he has tattoos ?
 
Why would there be supporters??? He ain’t a sportsman or a member of a sports team!!
as for the video in question I’ve seen worse on me daily commute to work!! Having said that I don’t think a playground dispute should result in the defendants family having threats of arson and rape against them, but hey that’s scum for ya☹️
It would seem that Mr Robinson told lies about a school child designed to inflame racial tension.
Surprised that he was only in court for libel TBH
 
I’am sure Tommy won’t be paying a single penny towards it.

I’am sure all his supporters will have doubled that amount over the next 24 hours.
 
I might have some green shield stamps somewhere, I’m sure they’ll help, mind you he’s probably too young to remember them.
 
Interested to see the mega successful and funded Yaxley is bankrupt. Tactical as you know who, or just lost too many court cases?
 
Oh No!! !

I've just seen a report on the BBC website that the legal costs could be up to £500,000.

I'm going to chip in a peseta as well.
It’s fairly easy to underestimate lawyers’ greed.
I’ve got a rupee that Yaxley-Lennon can have. Sorry it’s not a silver one.
 
I suppose you can only take people as you find them. Seeing as I’ve never met the bloke and I’m sure plenty haven’t on here your only left with the media’s version of events. I’ve never met most of the people on here who seem to think I’m a lot of nasty things, but I’d wager if you ever met me in real life your views would be different.

As I’ve said many times on here people believe what they want to believe.
 
I suppose you can only take people as you find them. Seeing as I’ve never met the bloke and I’m sure plenty haven’t on here your only left with the media’s version of events. I’ve never met most of the people on here who seem to think I’m a lot of nasty things, but I’d wager if you ever met me in real life your views would be different.

As I’ve said many times on here people believe what they want to believe.

I accept the first sentence but for the fact that he's seems to be regularly in the news for a whole host of unsavoury things which 99.99999999% of the population aren't. These things aren't made up or fake news. He's actually involved in them which strongly suggests he's a total ** (which we all know but I'm giving you a sensible answer).

And I'm also sure Harold Shipman was charming if you'd met him.
 
I accept the first sentence but for the fact that he's seems to be regularly in the news for a whole host of unsavoury things which 99.99999999% of the population aren't. These things aren't made up or fake news. He's actually involved in them which strongly suggests he's a total ** (which we all know but I'm giving you a sensible answer).

And I'm also sure Harold Shipman was charming if you'd met him.
I still believe in innocent until proven guilty, that extends to actually knowing someone before I decide if they are a complete ** or not. We’re all driven by the media and social media without really knowing anything as fact before we make a decision on someone. It’s just the way of the world.
 
I still believe in innocent until proven guilty, that extends to actually knowing someone before I decide if they are a complete ** or not. We’re all driven by the media and social media without really knowing anything as fact before we make a decision on someone. It’s just the way of the world.
Driven by court decisions to be honest. Which tend to show off a person's character to a certain extent.
 
He was leader of the English Defence League. Before that a member of the BNP.
Has an extensive criminal record including numerous assault and fraud convictions
He blamed every Muslim for getting away with the 7 July bombings and has regularly makes racist comments online. No wonder goal machine thinks he's a good bloke when the truth is he is racist scum with a propensity for violence.
 
I still believe in innocent until proven guilty, that extends to actually knowing someone before I decide if they are a complete ** or not. We’re all driven by the media and social media without really knowing anything as fact before we make a decision on someone. It’s just the way of the world.
Well he has been proven guilty. Several times. And for matters unrelated to his politics as well.

I accept a person might be subject to a miscarriage of justice once. But not as many times as he’s been convicted.

He’s a wrong ‘un. And nasty with it.
 
As a professional and convicted fraudster part of his skill set is to convince people he’s “a decent bloke”.
Possibly but if I’m sat in the pub and someone starts talking to me in a polite manner I’m gonna carry on the conversation as I would do with anyone 👍🏻 I wouldnt turn round and say”excuse me sir before I engage in conversation with you may I just ask, are you a fraudster”
 
Just seen his house on the news. How the hell does that clown get a kennel like that.
sorry Goosey he may be a lot of things and I don’t agree with everything he says but I agree with a hell of a lot!!! But he ain’t a clown, anyway are you still running after that coach in Sheffield 🤣
 
Possibly but if I’m sat in the pub and someone starts talking to me in a polite manner I’m gonna carry on the conversation as I would do with anyone 👍🏻 I wouldnt turn round and say”excuse me sir before I engage in conversation with you may I just ask, are you a fraudster”
Fair enough. But if afterwards you were told that he had a string of convictions for fraud and other offences would you reconsider your opinion of him? And wonder “well maybe he wasn’t that decent after all”?
 
I still believe in innocent until proven guilty, that extends to actually knowing someone before I decide if they are a complete ** or not. We’re all driven by the media and social media without really knowing anything as fact before we make a decision on someone. It’s just the way of the world.
Methinks these are just “weasel words”.

I think the facts speak for themselves. So making a decision, isn’t difficult.
 
I’m Not defending him, I know nothing about the conviction. There’s always two sides to every story even after a court conviction.
There are not always 2 sides to every story, if by that you mean partial blame on each side, sometimes innocent people are the victims of vicious bullies.
 
Back
Top