Incitement to kill

Mexboroseasider

Well-known member
I had decided to take a break from this board but as Jaffa the Nut decided to have a pop over a post I made three months ago, I’ve re found my mojo.

“Someone should kill” Sadiq Khan.

So said Charlie Mullins. Wannabe Reform candidate.

Here’s what our fiends (sorry friends) on the right thought about the importance of free speech then.


Compare and contrast with recent events at Glastonbury.
 
I had decided to take a break from this board but as Jaffa the Nut decided to have a pop over a post I made three months ago, I’ve re found my mojo.

“Someone should kill” Sadiq Khan.

So said Charlie Mullins. Wannabe Reform candidate.

Here’s what our fiends (sorry friends) on the right thought about the importance of free speech then.


Compare and contrast with recent events at Glastonbury.
No do us all a favour please reconsider your decision I’m only thinking of your mental health. 🙏
 
Funny enough I’m taking a break after tonight for about 3 weeks.

So please don’t bother including my user name in cheap points scoring threads of yours which have absolutely nothing at all to do with me.

Good evening.
Bish bash bosh and Jaffa the Nut retires complaining about “hurty words”.

😂
 
Bish bash bosh and Jaffa the Nut retires complaining about “hurty words”.
Nope it’s holiday time so the last thing i want to read is the same old shite from you during this time.

Ps
The break would have done you good as it sounds like you really need one right now.

Finally good night it’s an early start tomorrow. 😘
 
Nope it’s holiday time so the last thing i want to read is the same old shite from you during this time.

Ps
The break would have done you good as it sound like you really need one right now.
So you’re not prepared to condemn Charlie Mullins and his incitement to kill pronouncements then?

Or agree that such calls should bar him from standing for any political position then?

Ok. Two Tier Jaffa.

Enjoy your holidays.
 
So you’re not prepared to condemn Charlie Mullins and his incitement to kill pronouncements then?

Or agree that such calls should bar him from standing for any political position then?

Ok. Two Tier Jaffa.

Enjoy your holidays.
....so you're not prepared to condemn Kneecap and their incitement to kill Tory MP's then.

Two tier Mex but we always knew that.
 
This is all very amusing, I have no further comment at this time and refer you to my PR team, or I would do if I had one but I don't.
 
....so you're not prepared to condemn Kneecap and their incitement to kill Tory MP's then.
Point me to the post where I’ve condoned any such action.

FYI I don’t have any problem condemning incitement to kill MPs of whatever party.

I also don’t have a problem condemning wannabe Reform candidates who call for the democratically elected Mayor of London to be killed.

Or leaders of political parties who whip people into a frenzy so that they actually go out and kill MPs (RIP Jo Cox).

I’m just highlighting the hypocrisy, double standards and lack of a moral compass of quite a few on here.
 
Point me to the post where I’ve condoned any such action.

FYI I don’t have any problem condemning incitement to kill MPs of whatever party.

I also don’t have a problem condemning wannabe Reform candidates who call for the democratically elected Mayor of London to be killed.

Or leaders of political parties who whip people into a frenzy so that they actually go out and kill MPs (RIP Jo Cox).

I’m just highlighting the hypocrisy, double standards and lack of a moral compass of quite a few on here.
like i said you were quick to jump down Jaffas throat on post 3 of the other thread whilst completely avoiding the fact you hadn't comment on post 1.

So maybe just like you i'm highlighting the hypocrisy, double standards and lack of a moral compass of quite a few on here. Especially yours.
 
like i said you were quick to jump down Jaffas throat on post 3 of the other thread whilst completely avoiding the fact you hadn't comment on post 1.

So maybe just like you i'm highlighting the hypocrisy, double standards and lack of a moral compass of quite a few on here. Especially yours.
And I see you haven’t condemned wannabe Reform candidate Charlie Mullins for incitement to kill the democratically elected mayor of London.

I’m talking of hypocrisy again. Especially yours.
 
And I see you haven’t condemned wannabe Reform candidate Charlie Mullins for incitement to kill the democratically elected mayor of London.

I’m talking of hypocrisy again. Especially yours.
well maybe i'll take as long as you did re post 1 of that thread. Was it 3 months? Can you resurrect the thread then and i'll be happy to oblige.
 
Ah right. So you don’t condemn calls for the London Mayor to be killed.

Well now we know where we stand.
are you incapable of reading properly? I said it took you 3 months to reply to post 1 of that thread so come back to me in 3 months and i'd be happy to oblige.
 
are you incapable of reading properly? I said it took you 3 months to reply to post 1 of that thread so come back to me in 3 months and i'd be happy to oblige.
Thank you for reiterating that you aren’t prepared to condemn calls to kill the Mayor of London.

We’re now perfectly clear on your position.
 
No need to keep digging yourself further into the hole.

You’re not prepared to condemn calls to kill the mayor of London.

Everyone is clear on your moral compass.
nope, your making things up. Pretty shameful that you had to be embarrassed into saying that you condemned the words and even then you couldn't even be specific about Kneecap. Maybe everyone is clear where your sympathies are eh? Maybe it is time for you to take a rest, like 66 did.
 
nope, your making things up. Pretty shameful that you had to be embarrassed into saying that you condemned the words and even then you couldn't even be specific about Kneecap. Maybe everyone is clear where your sympathies are eh? Maybe it is time for you to take a rest, like 66 did.
Stop making things up. It’s perfectly clear what’s happening.

Pretty shameful that, despite repeated opportunities, you have refused to condemn Charlie Mullins and his call for the mayor of London to be killed.

Your problem is that, with your recalcitrance, you’ve painted yourself into a corner. You now only have two choices.

Humiliate and embarrass yourself by belatedly condemning Mr Mullins for his outrageous demand despite your previous refusal to do so.
Or

Continue to refuse to do so while condemning Kneecap, and try to distract from your hypocrisy with personal attacks on other posters.

Two Tier 20s has a certain ring to it.
 
Stop making things up. It’s perfectly clear what’s happening.

Pretty shameful that, despite repeated opportunities, you have refused to condemn Charlie Mullins and his call for the mayor of London to be killed.

Your problem is that, with your recalcitrance, you’ve painted yourself into a corner. You now only have two choices.

Humiliate and embarrass yourself by belatedly condemning Mr Mullins for his outrageous demand despite your previous refusal to do so.
Or

Continue to refuse to do so while condemning Kneecap, and try to distract from your hypocrisy with personal attacks on other posters.

Two Tier 20s has a certain ring to it.
i haven't refused to do anything Pinocchio. Learn to read properly. All i've done is embarrass you for calling Jaffa out over something that took you over 3 months to do yourself. Now that really is two tier.
 
Stop making things up. It’s perfectly clear what’s happening.

Pretty shameful that, despite repeated opportunities, you have refused to condemn Charlie Mullins and his call for the mayor of London to be killed.

Your problem is that, with your recalcitrance, you’ve painted yourself into a corner. You now only have two choices.

Humiliate and embarrass yourself by belatedly condemning Mr Mullins for his outrageous demand despite your previous refusal to do so.
Or

Continue to refuse to do so while condemning Kneecap, and try to distract from your hypocrisy with personal attacks on other posters.

Two Tier 20s has a certain ring to it.
Isn't it a bit early to be on gin

You are bringing something up from 3 years ago to try and make some sort of point

Ridiculous
 
Last edited:
I had decided to take a break from this board but as Jaffa the Nut decided to have a pop over a post I made three months ago, I’ve re found my mojo.

“Someone should kill” Sadiq Khan.

So said Charlie Mullins. Wannabe Reform candidate.

Here’s what our fiends (sorry friends) on the right thought about the importance of free speech then.


Compare and contrast with recent events at Glastonbury.
Two nutters preaching death.
I’m impartial lock em all up.
 
i haven't refused to do anything Pinocchio. Learn to read properly. All i've done is embarrass you for calling Jaffa out over something that took you over 3 months to do yourself. Now that really is two tier.
Oh right. So where’s your post where you condemn Charlie Mullins for calling for someone to kill the mayor of London then? Seems to me you’re refusing to do so, but you’ll no doubt be able to point me to the post number.

And if you’d paid attention at school, and learnt to read properly, you’d have seen that I haven’t posted about politics for some time, which answers your comment about “3 months”. I only resumed posting because Jaffa decided to have a pop over a post of mine from April. I suspect the silly old fool mistook me for Voyeur but there we go. He’s flounced now anyway over some “hurty words”.

As you were.
 
Isn't it a bit early to be on gin

You are bringing something up from 3 years ago to try and make some sort of point

Ridiculous
Blimey the right whingers are queuing up to jump into the keep net this morning. Just waiting on Bender and his weird mate Tuggiz now.

What’s 3 years got to do with it? Are we not allowed to mention Jimmy Saville or Pakistani rape gangs because it happened a few years ago?

Ridiculous.

20mph. Brrmmmmm. 🚗
 
Blimey the right whingers are queuing up to jump into the keep net this morning. Just waiting on Bender and his weird mate Tuggiz now.

What’s 3 years got to do with it? Are we not allowed to mention Jimmy Saville or Pakistani rape gangs because it happened a few years ago?

Ridiculous.

20mph. Brrmmmmm.
I think you need help, I'm seriously worried about your mental health
 
Oh and while we are locking up the death preachers can someone punch that cad Rupert Lowe. Something about him irritates me.
 
Ridiculous that we are having a debate about which incitement to kill is the most wrong.
Deflecting and whataboutery have no place at all here. Inciting murder through hate speech is every level of wrong.
So incitement to kill the IDF, which is illegally killing civilians in large numbers, is no worse than incitement to kill asylum seekers in a hotel?
 
So incitement to kill the IDF, which is illegally killing civilians in large numbers, is no worse than incitement to kill asylum seekers in a hotel?
It’s inciting violence and that is against the law in the UK.
Innocent Israeli’s were also killed remember ? You can’t pick and choose who you accept the incitement of violence against in the UK, that’s the very essence of the law, and that it does not discriminate. IDF soldiers are people too you know, Jewish people shouldn’t be discriminated against in this way on UK soil.
So yeah, all bad and very definitely not a competition.
 
It’s inciting violence and that is against the law in the UK.
Innocent Israeli’s were also killed remember ? You can’t pick and choose who you accept the incitement of violence against in the UK, that’s the very essence of the law, and that it does not discriminate. IDF soldiers are people too you know, Jewish people shouldn’t be discriminated against in this way on UK soil.
So yeah, all bad and very definitely not a competition.
I agree that both are wrong, and both are illegal of course. I just think the anger against people who are deliberately killing civilians is more justifiable than the anger against asylum seekers in a hostel.

Difficult to argue with that I think.
 
I agree that both are wrong, and both are illegal of course. I just think the anger against people who are deliberately killing civilians is more justifiable than the anger against asylum seekers in a hostel.

Difficult to argue with that I think.
Good point.

“Lieutenant, I think we should shoot these Waffen SS murderers out of hand”. France circa 1944.

Compared to:

“Lieutenant, I think we should shoot these women and children out of hand”. Vietnam circa 1968.

Not really equivalent are they.
 
Good point.

“Lieutenant, I think we should shoot these Waffen SS murderers out of hand”. France circa 1944.

Compared to:

“Lieutenant, I think we should shoot these women and children out of hand”. Vietnam circa 1968.

Not really equivalent are they.
Unless your mind is strapped into a right wing straitjacket and refuses to think about the nuances of the situations. In my opinion.
 
Nothing to do with right or left, it’s concerning the law, and inciting violence.. It’s illegal.

We aren’t at war with Israel, or the Palestinians. We have no grounds whatsoever to be inciting violence against any of them on British soil. None whatsoever.
Calling for someone, something or the people in some organisation to be killed is perfectly legal. It's freedom.of speech.
 
Calling for someone, something or the people in some organisation to be killed is perfectly legal. It's freedom.of speech.
No it isn’t. Freedom of speech does not include the right to incite violence. And I quote:-

‘Incitement to violence is not protected by freedom of speech in the UK or under international law.’

Thought you’d have known that.
 
No it isn’t. Freedom of speech does not include the right to incite violence. And I quote:-

‘Incitement to violence is not protected by freedom of speech in the UK or under international law.’

Thought you’d have known that.
That is correct. However I can say - quite openly - that I would like to see X group slaughtered for what they've done, without fear of arrest.
 
That is correct. However I can say - quite openly - that I would like to see X group slaughtered for what they've done, without fear of arrest.
You said in your initial response to me above that ‘calling for someone or the people of an organisation to be killed is allowed under freedom of speech.’ It is absolutely not and it is illegal. And you were wrong.
 
You said in your initial response to me above that ‘calling for someone or the people of an organisation to be killed is allowed under freedom of speech.’ It is absolutely not and it is illegal. And you were wrong.
OK. I would like to see all remaining Nazis from WW2 put up against a wall and shot
I don't care how old they are.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: no9
You said in your initial response to me above that ‘calling for someone or the people of an organisation to be killed is allowed under freedom of speech.’ It is absolutely not and it is illegal. And you were wrong.
Would you condemn the actions of the IDF? The genocide they are committing?
 
I see Bob Vylan have now lost a big US tour as they've had their visas revoked, along with being dropped by their label.

Chanting hate and encouraging violence isn't acceptable whatever your views are on the Israeli armed forces and their actions, and rightly so there are consequences. Could get worse for them if charged. The cynical side of me thinks they used the conflict to make a statement and gain publicity from it - that's now backfired in a big way.

And what happened to Glastonbury being about peace etc, not chanting death to certain factions?
 
Back
Top