Matesrates
Well-known member
They’re doing surge testing and vaccinations in affected areas to try to suppress the virus and stop it spreading, but they’re saying it will become the dominant variant in the uk. So what’s the point?
Indian variant probably not more infectious after all. PHE have said
I’ll let you know this on here as it won’t make the mainstream news, too positive.
Can't imagine this country will entertain a 4th lockdown, let's be honest.TBF TAM it makes a very significant difference and so it does matter... It's likely to mean the difference between continuing on plan or winding back the measures and re-entering lockdown.
If the Indian Variant was (as suggested) 50% more transmissable than the Kent one, then we'd very likely have had little choice in the matter.Can't imagine this country will entertain a 4th lockdown, let's be honest.
I agree with you regarding the people returning, I’ve dared to say before that political games are being played with the restrictions, the Indian saga highlights it.To be honest AK it doesn't matter if it isn't more infectious - the fact is it's caused a massive issue that may delay our exit from restrictions because 20k have come back from a country ravaged with the new strain of virus and we have let them self-isolate ( and clearly many haven't ) just so as to not upset Modi
I think you'd see more protests and probably riots if they put another lockdown on peoples shoulders. Especially after 70/80% of the country has been vaccinated and it'll be summer.If the Indian Variant was (as suggested) 50% more transmissable than the Kent one, then we'd very likely have had little choice in the matter.
The difference is though, that unlike when the Kent variant hit, no one had been vaccinated, now were well into the programme and that will make a huge difference.If the Indian Variant was (as suggested) 50% more transmissable than the Kent one, then we'd very likely have had little choice in the matter.
Misinformation ha ha... you’re mixing me up with Sage.Except it was on the BBC news yesterday (Matt Hancock said exactly that).
You appear to be so wrapped up in your conspiracy world that you are posting misinformation.
You are right though it is positive news, but for the reasons TAM points out, it appears to be an own goal which may delay the `road map`...
Yep I agree, you probably would see more protests.I think you'd see more protests and probably riots if they put another lockdown on peoples shoulders. Especially after 70/80% of the country has been vaccinated and it'll be summer.
The difference is though, that unlike when the Kent variant hit, no one had been vaccinated, now were well into the programme and that will make a huge difference.
There is a positive as well, in that those in the affected areas are coming forward in their droves to get vaccinated.
Can I just say a special thank you to & Matty Hancock for this. Just the 48 hours of variants without clear evidence and many people thinking there will be local lockdowns or an increase in hospitalisations and deaths again, all good for people’s mental health.Covid: Increasing confidence jabs work against Indian variant
There is "increasing confidence" Covid vaccines are effective against the variant, Matt Hancock says.www.bbc.co.uk
Like I said, it was reported on the main stream news yesterday. You claimed it wasn`t. Misinformation...
Am I missing something?Covid: Increasing confidence jabs work against Indian variant
There is "increasing confidence" Covid vaccines are effective against the variant, Matt Hancock says.www.bbc.co.uk
Like I said, it was reported on the main stream news yesterday. You claimed it wasn`t. Misinformation...
That's what I was sayingTBF TAM it makes a very significant difference and so it does matter... It's likely to mean the difference between continuing on plan or winding back the measures and re-entering lockdown.
Sorry I must have misunderstood what you saidThat's what I was saying
They put India on the Red List far too late and let 20,000 Indians back into the country before they finally did. Boris always bangs on about learning from the lessons but this may come back and haunt him as it could have a serious impact on the Roadmap out of this pendemic. He was quick to put Bangladesh and Pakistan on the Red List much earlier than India who both had far less infection rates.
There ought to be supervised quarantine and testing for those coming in from red list countries. No excuse not to do this.
It was far too late in the case of India and with a pre-warning to allow people the get back ahead of the quarantine rules.https://www.gov.uk/guidance/red-amber-and-green-list-rules-for-entering-england
If you have been in a country or territory on the red list in the last 10 days you will only be allowed to enter the UK if you are a British or Irish National, or you have residence rights in the UK.
On arrival in England you must: quarantine in a managed hotel, including 2 COVID-19 tests
The government has reacted late to the Indian variant, it doesn’t matter how many ways the turd needs to be polished it was late and we are having to pay a price for it. The lessons have not been learned about border closures and given we are an island it’s not rocket science as we all saw the problems unfold infront of our very eyes on the news in India well before they decided to put them on the red list. Allowing 20k at risk people into the UK is unacceptable.It seems that the Joint Biosecurity Centre updated their risk assessment on 19 April and both England and Scotland (and I presume Wales & NI) added India to the red list on the same day:
Ministers have taken the decision to put India on the acute risk list of travel countries after the Joint Biosecurity Centre increased India’s risk rating.
https://www.gov.scot/news/india-placed-on-red-list-of-travel-countries/
Pakistan and Bangladesh were red listed over concerns about SA and Brazil variants rather than absolute case numbers, also at the time India had fewer cases per capita than the UK, there was a stronger case for putting most of the EU on the red list than India.
India was red-listed due to the rapid rise in cases, although even then they were at about 1/3 of the level in France.
Finally B.1.617.2 was only upgraded from VUI to VOC on 6 May, about 2 weeks after India was added to the red list.
It was far too late in the case of India and with a pre-warning to allow people the get back ahead of the quarantine rules.
Doesn’t matter what anyone else did. It was too late. It was happening in real time in front of our eyes and it was very clear what should have happened. It didn’t.Scotland acted on the same day and did the exact same things, it was the day the scientific advice changed, the UK actually acted earlier than most of the rest of Europe in this case.
Nice deflection Matt...Matt Hancock making commons statement saying that most of the 19 people in hospital in Bolton were eligible for the vaccine, but didn’t take it up. Bet they wish they had now.
Doesn’t matter what anyone else did. It was too late. It was happening in real time in front of our eyes and it was very clear what should have happened. It didn’t.
Nice deflection Matt...
Darwinism again Dave.On the radio yesterday they said that 'Of the 20 brought in with the Indian variant, none had actually had an inoculation'.
Unbelievable.
They are not all youngsters either.
Have a look at the top of the board...What day do you think they should have been put on the red list and what is the basis for your opinion?
I promise you'll find no mention of "Indian variant" on here before May 7th
The issue with this Indian variant is that it tends to make the under-40s age group very sick and hospitalises them
Have a look at the top of the board...
Several BBC News reports over the past week from their in-country correspondents visiting overloaded Indian hospitals and interviews with their doctors. They said they were seeing a high proportion of under-40s amongst their patients.Source?
I don't think you can compare the effects of the Indian variant on the Indian population with it's effect on the UK population.Several BBC News reports over the past week from their in-country correspondents visiting overloaded Indian hospitals and interviews with their doctors.
Why not? Compare, I mean.I don't think you can compare the effects of the Indian variant on the Indian population with it's effect on the UK population.
I'm not dismissing genuine concerns about this new variant though.
Several BBC News reports over the past week from their in-country correspondents visiting overloaded Indian hospitals and interviews with their doctors.
I've seen no such reports and can find no evidence to support your claim.
Also correspondents visiting hospitals is not reliable evidence.
There’s a whole thread from mid-April where multiple people on this board could see the issue and could see how the government weren’t reacting to the basic rules and principles they’d set. If we could see it...Sorry, I don't get your point, and it should be straightforward for you to give a date and reason rather than your cryptic answer.
In the throes of negotiating a trade deal when this came out. All those banging on about economy losing out to health concerns will be delighted.They put India on the Red List far too late and let 20,000 Indians back into the country before they finally did. Boris always bangs on about learning from the lessons but this may come back and haunt him as it could have a serious impact on the Roadmap out of this pendemic. He was quick to put Bangladesh and Pakistan on the Red List much earlier than India who both had far less infection rates.
The answer will be no.And in this article...
“In the space of just 12 days, the Covid positivity rate doubled to 17%, while in Delhi it hit 30%. Hospitals across the country have filled to capacity but this time it is predominately the young taking up the beds; in Delhi, 65% of cases are under 40 years old.”‘The system has collapsed’: India’s descent into Covid hell
Many falsely believed that the country had defeated Covid. Now hospitals are running out of oxygen and bodies are stacking up in morgueswww.theguardian.com
“Dr Amit Thadhani, director of Niramaya hospital in Mumbai, said this time round the virus was “much more aggressive and much more infectious” and was now predominately affecting young people. “Now it is people in their 20s and 30s who are coming in with very severe symptoms and there is a lot of mortality among young people,” he said.”
Satisfied?
In the throes of negotiating a trade deal when this came out. All those banging on about economy losing out to health concerns will be delighted.
Zoom or more secure conference facilities are available with legally binding electronic signatures would have secured the trade detail, me thinks Wizaard.In the throes of negotiating a trade deal when this came out. All those banging on about economy losing out to health concerns will be delighted.
Satisfied?
Linky?There’s a whole thread from mid-April where multiple people on this board could see the issue and could see how the government weren’t reacting to the basic rules and principles they’d set. If we could see it...