Martonmosser
Well-known member
All getting beyond a joke now. It’s about time the vulnerable were protected and the rest of us were left to get on with our lives
All getting beyond a joke now. It’s about time the vulnerable were protected and the rest of us were left to get on with our lives
Let them self isolate but give them financial supportAnd how do you protect the vulnerable, with no vaccine, asymptomatic carriers and so many people now flouting the basic hygiene guidance let alone the isolation/quarantine rules?
Picture a household with mum and dad both in their 50’s who have one of their elderly parents living with them, and they have 2 teenage kids say 15 and 17 living at home. How would that work in your scenario? Kick the kids out to live where?Let them self isolate but give them financial support
Spot on BFC3.Cruzzer consistently fails to grasp that. They are guidelines. It's impossible to cover every different set of circumstances other wise it would be a dossier of about 1000 pages.You can’t really base decision making on the most extraordinary circumstances. Everyone is unique, we will all have a story as to why a particular measure is bad for our circumstances.
This is not a situation where you can please or help every individual on a micro-level. The aim is to minimise harm overall.
Oi, don’t drag me into this.Spot on BFC3.Cruzzer consistently fails to grasp that. They are guidelines. It's impossible to cover every different set of circumstances other wise it would be a dossier of about 1000 pages.
But when you go down the route of "picture this" or "what if" then there are so many different circumstances.Oi, don’t drag me into this.
There’s a lot calling for the shielding of the over 50’s (which I’m against and in that category) yet the cannot answer how in practice it would work in the real world.But when you go down the route of "picture this" or "what if" then there are so many different circumstances.