If he came back , apologised for the mistake he made in leaving , would you have him back ? Didn’t exactly set the world alight at qpr
Alongside an enforced No 2, not flying solo.He's objectively one of the best available candidates.
TommoAlongside an enforced No 2, not flying solo.
He'd perhaps have the sway to convince those that may be looking elsewhereLots of people acting like they are in the Godfather and they must never forgive a great betrayal.
He is a strong candidate, knows the club and has worked with a large proportion of the players. And has pedigree getting promoted from League 1. Would be a good decision.
100% with youTommo
Critch was always found wanting when it went wrong, plus I found his tactics a bit too cautious
I think everything post Critch shows we weren’t found wanting under him. I’d take him back like a shot the players would tooTommo
Critch was always found wanting when it went wrong, plus I found his tactics a bit too cautious
Right so we get a lesser manager because of superstition?Grayson didn't work
Appleton didn't work
Critchely back won't ever work
FFS learn from your mistakes BFC.
It couldn’tNope , not for me , not sure it could happen but my choice be Nathan jones , but like I said not sure it could happen
His last 10 games with us and his record at QPR were awful, granted we will more than likely be in a lower league next seasonRight so we get a lesser manager because of superstition?
Not for me. Are people forgetting the negative football that we played and the hammerings at PNE and Posh away ?
Yeah definitelyIf he came back , apologised for the mistake he made in leaving , would you have him back ? Didn’t exactly set the world alight at qpr
If he had Tommo alongside him then yes.Tommo
Critch was always found wanting when it went wrong, plus I found his tactics a bit too cautious
Yeah, if you’re going to cherry pick certain times then you can make any managers time sound bad and wasn’t one of them 10 games a 6-1 win? He got us promoted and kept us up. For a club our size that is some achievement.His last 10 games with us and his record at QPR were awful, granted we will more than likely be in a lower league next season
Are you forgetting 83 points in L1, promotion, beating PNE at home, 4 points v Rovers and winning at Sheffield United.Not for me. Are people forgetting the negative football that we played and the hammerings at PNE and Posh away ?
Last ten games included draws with Sheff Utd, Blackburn and Luton, an away win at Barnsley and a 6-1 win against Birmingham. That's half the last ten games. And a last minute defeat away to WBA. Talk about focusing on the negatives. And we had stayed up comfortable, with players now deemed not good enough for the Championship.His last 10 games with us and his record at QPR were awful, granted we will more than likely be in a lower league next season
Not quote as bad as the Appleton appointment as Critchley has done good things here and was loved.It’s a no from me cos if we lose a couple it’s back to the Appleton saga.
Fresh start. Let’s go.
I think that most of the messages on this thread tend to agree with me rather than you, don't they ?Are you forgetting 83 points in L1, promotion, beating PNE at home, 4 points v Rovers and winning at Sheffield United.
See how that’s easily flipped to not fit in with your negative agenda ???
If he had some decency when he left things may be slightly different. The way it happened annoyed a lot but tbh losing him to a number 2 role made us look daft so that was a factor too.I'd happily have him back from a personal perspective, I think the bloke is an absolute genius and was one of the most meticulous managers that we have ever had. I think the players would all 100% agree that they have never been better prepared for individual games than they were under little Pep.
That said, you always have to account for the idiot factor and yesterday we saw how the idiots can turn on a sixpence and undermine everything... So I'm afraid it would require either a very well orchestrated PR campaign to try and get the idiots on-side or we'd probably be best just looking elsewhere.