Bend it like Suddick
Well-known member
Sky Sports News
No mention of JR...yet. Defender recalled.
Fingers crossed
No mention of JR...yet. Defender recalled.
Fingers crossed
I think it's all near enough sorted one way or the other.It would be great to get news that we have signed him on an 18 month contact with a 1 year option, that would be the ideal scenario.
Be knocking 36 in the option year, with a good wind we will be championship by then. Agree 18 months though, 250k fee to allow them to pay off the rest of his contract.It would be great to get news that we have signed him on an 18 month contact with a 1 year option, that would be the ideal scenario.
I don’t think he will go either, think the other Jordan might be off thoughI’m going out on a limb here and saying he’s not going back.
If he was why would they wait? They know who he is and what he can and can’t do. Why miss more games without him if they want him back?
Ooooh darnI don’t think he will go either, think the other Jordan might be off though
This’ll be interestingI've heard he's signing on a free, mutual agreement between both clubs
Personally I wouldn't sign him as he kinda limits how we play
Without his goals we would be limited. He showed his fitness against Lincoln by still going strong in the 96th minute!I've heard he's signing on a free, mutual agreement between both clubs
Personally I wouldn't sign him as he kinda limits how we play
Can you lend me your crystal ball please wouldn't mind some lottery numbersWithout his goals we would be limited. He showed his fitness against Lincoln by still going strong in the 96th minute!
So who would you sign Phil and for how much? Be a lot more than paying Rhodes contract off I hazardI've heard he's signing on a free, mutual agreement between both clubs
Personally I wouldn't sign him as he kinda limits how we play
Wobble Shake HeadPersonally I wouldn't sign him as he kinda limits how we play
It's a ridiculous question to be honest as I dont know what players are interested in coming to usSo who would you sign Phil and for how much? Be a lot more than paying Rhodes contract off I hazard
It seems like Phil is just being antagonistic and awkward, but he has a point, kinda. My boss is a Rovers nut. When we signed Rhodes ha said he'd score goals but do nothing else. He maintains this view, and that a team coan be stronger without a greedy goalscorer, who doesn't do much else for the team. I guess the argument is that a less "focused" centre forward may score say 30% less goals, but would provide more support and assists. It's almost Madine in reverse! My personal view is that goals win games. So whatever the way to maximise our resources to score most goals is the way to go.It's a ridiculous question to be honest as I dont know what players are interested in coming to us
Personally I would like someone a bit more mobile so we can play different systems
I'm not being antagonistic at allIt seems like Phil is just being antagonistic and awkward, but he has a point, kinda. My boss is a Rovers nut. When we signed Rhodes ha said he'd score goals but do nothing else. He maintains this view, and that a team coan be stronger without a greedy goalscorer, who doesn't do much else for the team. I guess the argument is that a less "focused" centre forward may score say 30% less goals, but would provide more support and assists. It's almost Madine in reverse! My personal view is that goals win games. So whatever the way to maximise our resources to score most goals is the way to go.
I'd also argue that Rhodes isn't a team player - I see him doing a lot of dirty work - he seems to relish playing alongside Beesley, and looks more threatening with Beesley alongside than anyone else.
Isn't or is a team player?It seems like Phil is just being antagonistic and awkward, but he has a point, kinda. My boss is a Rovers nut. When we signed Rhodes ha said he'd score goals but do nothing else. He maintains this view, and that a team coan be stronger without a greedy goalscorer, who doesn't do much else for the team. I guess the argument is that a less "focused" centre forward may score say 30% less goals, but would provide more support and assists. It's almost Madine in reverse! My personal view is that goals win games. So whatever the way to maximise our resources to score most goals is the way to go.
I'd also argue that Rhodes isn't a team player - I see him doing a lot of dirty work - he seems to relish playing alongside Beesley, and looks more threatening with Beesley alongside than anyone else.
It also inhibits Joseph from playing his natural position, so he's never getting a chance to show what he can do.I'm not being antagonistic at all
I was asked a question that's impossible to answer
I do agree with your point on Rhodes as well, he plays best in a front 2 and always has done through is career so it forces Critchleys hand into playing this 352 system