Bend it like Suddick
Well-known member
Deary me. Let's get one thing straight again, I said that Starmer as the Head of CPS should have known about allegations of one of the biggest Celebrities in the Country.Linking Starmer to the Jimmy Savile case as you have done several times on this thread. The decisions made not to prosecute were nothing to do with him despite what you have posted more than once. Read the link that I have posted above.
You then say that Starmer must have known about the allegations against Savile. This is completely irrelevant because prosecution couldn't take place in the cases at the time of Starmer as the complainants didn't want to give evidence in court.
You are simply repeating a lazy smear that is known to be false. If you care about the truth you should withdraw it.
To not be aware of that in his position shows a level of incompetence. As I stated before, Senior Police Officers,Politicians and certain Civil Servants have 'fallen on their sword' for substantially less.
No smearing, just a common sense assumption.
Nothing lazy, just a common sense assumption.
You withdraw lies, not common sense assumptions, I wasn't aware I said he 'definitely knew'.
The decisions not to prosecute were under his tenure were they not? I concede that he probably was not to blame individually, but ignorance of the facts is suspicious.
As for a prosecution couldn't take place as the complainants didn't want to give evidence at Court, that's irrelevant as the Police can prosecute without, although it is better to have them. Having said that, there were several who were willing to attend, but the associated Force didn't want to proceed which is inexcusable.