Exclusive: Owen Oyston has failed again.....

Simonized

Well-known member


Owen Oyston fails in £78m claim against receivers that sold Blackpool FC​

A desperate attempt by Owen Oyston to sue the team of receivers that sold Blackpool Football Club has been thrown out in court.​

The 88-year-old had claimed Paul Cooper and his partner David Rubin under-sold the Seasiders to Simon Sadler for the price of £8.2m.
Oyston brazenly argued the club was worth £59.7m, Bloomfield Road stadium £25m and the Squires Gate training ground £1.5m - making a grand total of £86.2m.
Oyston claimed the “loss and damage caused” to him was £78m - the amount by which the “market price for these assets exceeded the amount realised by the receivers”.
A two-day hearing to discuss the case at the Business and Property courts in Manchester ironically ended on Wednesday, March 9, a date that coincided with the third anniversary of Blackpool’s homecoming.
This was when Blackpool fans officially ended their boycott following Oyston’s departure from the club, resulting in almost 16,000 fans packing out Bloomfield Road for the 2-2 draw against Southend United.
In February 2019, in the weeks leading up to the supporters’ return, Cooper removed Oyston from Blackpool’s board, ending his 32-year tenure as owner.
That followed a judgement involving former director Valeri Belokon, who Oyston was ordered to pay £31.27m in November 2017.
Since being forced to relinquish his control of the football club, Oyston has been involved in a series of protracted legal matters.
In this latest case, Oyston made a serious allegation of negligence, claiming the receivers had “breached their duty” through the sale of assets of Denaxe, the company formerly known as Segesta that owned the majority of shares in the football club and its related assets.
Rather than sell the club and its related assets in a single sale to one purchaser, Oyston believed the assets ought to have been broken up and sold separately.
In a later amendment to the claim that £59.7m should have been obtained for the club, Oyston, represented by Matthew Collings QC, argued the club was actually insolvent - a claim described as “rather remarkable” in the final judgement.
Denaxe argued the receivers were solely motivated by trying to save the club, rather than “maximising the realisation of the assets”.
The receivers, represented by David Mohyuddin QC, counter-claimed there was “no realistic prospect of the claim succeeding”, which judge Mr Justice Fancourt concurred with.
Justice Fancourt pointed out that his colleague Justice Marcus Smith ratified the transaction of the club sale in 2019, when he found the receivers’ actions were “unimpeachable”.


Justice Fancourt pointed out that his colleague Justice Marcus Smith ratified the transaction of the club sale in 2019, when he found the receivers’ actions were “unimpeachable”.
It was also found Oyston ought to have raised a challenge to whether the receivers had used “reasonable endeavours” to obtain the best market price during a previous court hearing in June 2019 prior to Sadler’s eventual takeover.
Oyston is permitted to appeal the judgement.
A secondary, more trivial claim, of an unlawful copying of a computer hard drive and the loss of an accounts computer has been referred to the County Court.
The receivers argue there is no evidence that they removed the computer from Denaxe’s offices, as well as providing Denaxe with a copy of the entire hard drive at the time of the court-appointed receivership.
It’s understood Oyston has already spent over £1m in failed litigation since the sale of the club.
According to the judgement, after the club was put up for sale and marketed, 19 parties signed non-disclosure agreements and were granted access to a data room.
Further negotiations with these parties led to three serious offers and one offer of a nominal £1.
One bid was made at a very late stage, which the receivers concluded was not a “reliable bid”.
 
Last edited:
Mr Justice Fancourt, bet his heart sank when he heard that name.


Horrible weasel of a man, argued the value down to try and stiff VB, then tried to say the club should have been killed to realise the true value of the assets, which is now suddently 10 times whay he argued in court.

Lifelong fan indeed. An actual piece of shit.
 
😂 Can someone remind me what Gerald Kranser’s expert valuation of BFC was in the Belokon trial.
Around £5-6 million, Mex. The expert witness for VB put the value at £53-58m, I think. Which, given the size of the repayable loans on the balance sheet, was very understandable.

It was clear that Krasner had :

  • not been told about these loans ; or
  • had not done any due diligence to spot them for himself ; and
  • therefore wasn't really in a position to come up with an "expert" opinion
 
then tried to say the club should have been killed to realise the true value of the assets. Lifelong fan indeed. An actual piece of shit.
Yep.

"The (Odious Owner's) primary case evolved during the course of proceedings into an assertion that the receivers’ duty to secure the best price for these assets was by way of separate asset sale; Blackpool Football Club ought to have been put into liquidation and Bloomfield Road sold for redevelopment"


Fan of the club? My arse.
 
Yep.

"The (Odious Owner's) primary case evolved during the course of proceedings into an assertion that the receivers’ duty to secure the best price for these assets was by way of separate asset sale; Blackpool Football Club ought to have been put into liquidation and Bloomfield Road sold for redevelopment"


Fan of the club? My arse.
Spot on Toastrack. Once again exposed by the justice system for what he is and for all the world to see.
 
Around £5-6 million, Mex. The expert witness for VB put the value at £53-58m, I think. Which, given the size of the repayable loans on the balance sheet, was very understandable.

It was clear that Krasner had :

  • not been told about these loans ; or
  • had not done any due diligence to spot them for himself ; and
  • therefore wasn't really in a position to come up with an "expert" opinion
From memory OO’s expert Mr Krasner split the difference and plumped for £5.5m. I’m famously crap at maths but there seems to be a marked difference between £78m and £5.5m. 😂

By one of those odd coincidences following a merger last year Messrs Krasner, Rubin and Cooper now all work for the same insolvency practice - Begbies Traynor. 😂
 
Buried gold bars, dabbling in the occult, sunbathing on top of the Armfield Stand in his speedos and making "bizarre demands" - then trying to carve up the carcass of the club he had supported since the age of two to line his pockets and - maybe - pay his debts. What is there left to say?
 
By one of those odd coincidences following a merger last year Messrs Krasner, Rubin and Cooper now all work for the same insolvency practice - Begbies Traynor. 😂
Don't tell Afroman. 😀

Wasn't Krasner part of the hugely successful (sic) Administrator Team at Wigan? Or was that someone else?
 
So having suffered years of St Owen Saviour of BFC and guardian of the money that was there when needed….the club was insolvent and he expected the assets to be broken up rather than the best deal done for the club. What a piece of work he is.

You’d think that touching 90 he would have just disappeared in disgrace and filled his days spending the money he still has on things other than lawyers and chasing hopeless causes. Nauseating stuff.

Good job St Marcus Smith nailed it all down in advance knowing what he was dealing with.
 
I thought I’d heard the last of all these phoney companies set up around Bfc to simply confuse, 80 ** 8 & the lunatic is still playing the victim. Typical narcissistic behaviour & I should know, having assisted in dealing with an ex family member. Their remit is if I can’t have it, then nobody else can either, & the cost doesn’t seem to matter (sound familiar 🇺🇦) If their was a god people like this would have been stifled before birth. I didn’t think I would get angry over this shower again but Grrrrr 😡 Perhaps I should just laugh at the absurdity & forget about his demented actions. Yeah I’ll do just that.
 
It’s nice to think having tons of money would be a great thing, but I’d rather not have it if it turns you into that kind of ‘character’

Yep.
He's the absolute opposite of this wonderful lady, who won £115m on Euromillions and has since given more than half away to friends, family and charity, and gets a great buzz from doing it.
 
At 88, I'm sure his 'friends' have told him to 'let it go', but it appears that his lifelong mission is to win at least one legal battle. That despite the fact he keeps getting humiliated and will know that we are loving it.
No doubt some of the mushrooms will still be reminiscing about how he saved our club.
 
Back
Top