Should the UK suspend arms sales to Israel

Should the UK stop/suspend arms sales to Israel

  • Stop/Suspend arms sales

    Votes: 44 67.7%
  • Keep selling arms to Israel

    Votes: 21 32.3%

  • Total voters
    65
People on the left with their moral holier than thou crusades People who think Britain is responsible for the worlds ills past and present,
As opposed to the people on the right who have run the country over the last 14 years and absolutely destroyed it, making it divided against itself for the benefit of a few, many of whom are based abroad and contribute nothing by way of taxes.
 
It was you who said we should cease trading with Russia. We have.

No deflection at all
of course you deflect. You think you sit in judgement of everything that is wrong with this country and love nothing more than believing you think you are morally correct on everything. A typical leftie attitude.You think because of that you have some sort of moral superiority. Whereas really you're just a nobody whose opinion counts for fuck all just like mine.
It's gone way beyond that now though. There's a justified response and there's what is happening now.

If Germany hadn't killed 6 million Jews in the 30s and 40s there wouldn't be an Israel, and that equally is now irrelevant.
Ah so, you've got such a great mind you've got a solution to the Israel problem.
 
find that a bit rich really. Imagine the consequences if Israel wasn't able to arm itself by means of arms deals. Maybe, there then wouldn't be an Israel for much longer with all those friendly neighbours close by. But hey, people maybe don't think that's relevant. Maybe, thank god that those people who are responsible for making these decisions have a bit more gumption than the knee-jerkists on here.
Why has no-one attempted to answer this post of mine. Few hours now.,
 
Why has no-one attempted to answer this post of mine. Few hours now.,
This whole thread has been hijacked by yourself, whilst bizarrely saying you've no interest in politics. You claim you're not interested "get on with your life, I can't do anything about it" is your repeated cry. You then resort to unwarranted slurs to posters about being lefty and/or anti semitic. Let's cut the pretence.
 
Now you are changing it to suit your agenda.
If Hitler wasn’t born or indeed didn't come to power 6 million Jews wouldn’t have been murdered.
If Putin wasn’t the president of Russia they wouldn’t have invaded Ukraine and 50,000 soldiers would still be alive to day.
The list is endless.
But Hamas are the guilty party here for what they did on that October Saturday morning and as a result 25,000 Palestinians have been killed because of them and do you honestly think they give one toss about them like the rest of the world does?
Well what would you say if someone came along and said we should ignore the fact that Putin invaded Russia (in the same way you want to ignore the fact Israel started the Six Day War and invaded and occupied Gaza)? Instead we should select a moment in the war when Ukraine struck at Russia (say the moment their missile hit the building killing dozens/hundreds of Russian soldiers). And then say “Right. This act entitles Russia to do whatever it wants. To indiscriminately bomb, starve and kill children. And Zelensky is the one responsiblr everything we do”.

I suspect you’d say (quite rightly) that it was a ridiculous argument and yet it’s precisely the argument you’re making in relation to Gaza.

There may be cause and effect but each country/organsiation is responsible for its own actions. Israel invaded Gaza and oppressed the Palestinians. Hamas was created because of that oppression but is responsible for the murders and atrocities on 7/10 not Israel. And Israel is responsible for its actions since then, including the killing of the British veterans in what was a deliberate and targeted attack.
 
Well what would you say if someone came along and said we should ignore the fact that Putin invaded Russia (in the same way you want to ignore the fact Israel started the Six Day War and invaded and occupied Gaza)? Instead we should select a moment in the war when Ukraine struck at Russia (say the moment their missile hit the building killing dozens/hundreds of Russian soldiers). And then say “Right. This act entitles Russia to do whatever it wants. To indiscriminately bomb, starve and kill children. And Zelensky is the one responsiblr everything we do”.

I suspect you’d say (quite rightly) that it was a ridiculous argument and yet it’s precisely the argument you’re making in relation to Gaza.

There may be cause and effect but each country/organsiation is responsible for its own actions. Israel invaded Gaza and oppressed the Palestinians. Hamas was created because of that oppression but is responsible for the murders and atrocities on 7/10 not Israel. And Israel is responsible for its actions since then, including the killing of the British veterans in what was a deliberate and targeted attack.
It's where we failed in Northern Ireland, with hindsight, we should've collectively punished the entire Catholic population with murder and starvation for the atrocities carried out by the IRA after the murder of Mountbatten.
 
It's where we failed in Northern Ireland, with hindsight, we should've collectively punished the entire Catholic population with murder and starvation for the atrocities carried out by the IRA after the murder of Mountbatten.
Actually, according to the logic of some on here, what we should’ve done was supply arms to the IRA which they could then have used to kill British soldiers and civilians. After all, they were going to get the arms from somewhere so it might well have been us.
 
Without looking too deep, every fecker apart from Phil and 20s.

Apologies to anybody I've missed.

I'm not sure I was being overly serious 66, in fact I'm sure I wasn't and I'm also sure Britain was a better place when people were proud of being British and not apologising for being British.

Sorry for moving things away from the poll.

As you were.
Ah yes. The true patriots are those who want to continue supplying arms to a country that has just “murdered” 3 British civilians/veterans.

The anti British haters are those who think this is questionable.

Well yes, that all makes perfect sense.
 
Actually, according to the logic of some on here, what we should’ve done was supply arms to the IRA which they could then have used to kill British soldiers and civilians. After all, they were going to get the arms from somewhere so it might well have been us.
Good point, if Thatcher had directly armed the IRA then she may well have have completely cut off the funding from NORAID.

Jobs for British rifle manufacturers and not M16s from the US.
 
And you never pass judgement on anything? Or take any interest in politics?
This whole thread has been hijacked by yourself, whilst bizarrely saying you've no interest in politics. You claim you're not interested "get on with your life, I can't do anything about it" is your repeated cry. You then resort to unwarranted slurs to posters about being lefty and/or anti semitic. Let's cut the pretence.
I'd suggest that a major conflict going on that is grabbing the worlds attention is a bit more than politics. The boring British politcs of red v blue, left v right that so many of you love to indulge yourselves in on a daily basis.
 
Actually, according to the logic of some on here, what we should’ve done was supply arms to the IRA which they could then have used to kill British soldiers and civilians. After all, they were going to get the arms from somewhere so it might well have been us.
brilliant distortion and deflection. Well done. Well, no not really it's a load of bollux. The IRA deliberately targetted British soldiers, citizens an politicians. Can you state the IDF deliberately targetted those 3 British citizens knowing that they were travelling in the vehicles. The IRA never apologised for thier crimes of murder, they chose more to celebrate. On the other hand the IDF have said it was a "grave error", which it was.. Absolute shame on you and the others for making such a comparison. Disgusting.
 
brilliant distortion and deflection. Well done. Well, no not really it's a load of bollux. The IRA deliberately targetted British soldiers, citizens a politicians. Can you state the IDF deliberately targetted those 3 British citizens knowing that they were travelling in the vehicles. The IRA never apologised for thier crimes of murder, they chose more to celebrate. On the other hand the IDF have said it was a "grave error", which it was.. Absolute shame on you and the others for making such a comparison. Disgusting.
More manufactured outrage because you’ve been shown up as a Plastic Patriot.

Anyway I’m off to London for the day. Being the centre of anti Britishness so hated by some on here.
 
brilliant distortion and deflection. Well done. Well, no not really it's a load of bollux. The IRA deliberately targetted British soldiers, citizens an politicians. Can you state the IDF deliberately targetted those 3 British citizens knowing that they were travelling in the vehicles. The IRA never apologised for thier crimes of murder, they chose more to celebrate. On the other hand the IDF have said it was a "grave error", which it was.. Absolute shame on you and the others for making such a comparison. Disgusting.
I have to say that you are extremely naive if you take the statements issued by the Israeli government and the IDF at face value.

What we do know is this;
  • The IDF knew that the vehicles were from an aid agency.
  • The IDF knew that foreign aid workers would be in the vehicles
  • The vehicles had very clear markings on their roofs of an aid agency
  • The IDF was told of the journey being made in advance
  • The individual vehicles were 1 km apart
  • The IDF destroyed all 3 vehicles
  • The IDF first tried to blame Hamas for the atrocity before reluctantly accepting that they had killed the civilians
  • 3 British people are now dead because of the actions of the Israelis
  • Netanyahu, the Israeli PM, has not apologised for the killings
Therefore the IDF must have known that aid workers were in the vehicles and murdered them.

Your reply is simply confected outrage in an attempt to deflect from your confused position on this. You have already accepted that the killings were murder. If anything is disgusting, it is the fact that you won't condemn these murders.
 
Last edited:
I have to say that you are extremely naive if you take the statements by the Israeli government and the IDF at face value.

What we do know is this;
  • The IDF knew that the vehicles were from an aid agency.
  • The IDF knew that foreign aid workers would be in the vehicles
  • The vehicles had very clear markings on their roofs of an aid agency
  • The IDF was told of the journey being made in advance
  • The individual vehicles were 1 km apart
  • The IDF destroyed all 3 vehicles
  • The IDF first tried to blame Hamas for the atrocity before reluctantly accepting that they had killed the civilians
  • 3 British people are now dead because of the actions of the Israelis
  • Netanyahu, the Israeli PM, has not apologised for the killings
The IDF must have known that aid workers were in the vehicles and murdered them.

Your reply is simply confected outrage in an attempt to deflect from your confused position on this. You have accepted that the killings were murder. If anything is disgusting, it is the fact that you won't condemn these murders.
let's put a few things right eh. Of course i condemn these killings/murders. I condemn the killing of all innocent citizens caught up in this conflict which was started by Hamas on 7/10 when the calculatedly entered Israel with the sole intention of murdering as many people of all ages as they could.

I will add that there is a massive propaganda war going on and as i said months and months ago that it is one which Israel cannot win. Israel have stated it was a grave error which it was and i condemn them for it. But that's not the topic of discussion started by the o/p is it? I come back to the point which it seems a few of you want to ignore. if Israel weren't able to buy arms from overseas and receive the backing of the USA and a few others, then how long before the israeli nation would be wiped off the face of the earth? or don't you consider that relevant? Let's face it, it's the aim of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houttis in Yemen, Iran and a few other others as well. it's called the bigger picture. Perhaps for some on here if it were to happen, well it would be a case of "ah well, they had it coming."
 
More manufactured outrage because you’ve been shown up as a Plastic Patriot.

Anyway I’m off to London for the day. Being the centre of anti Britishness so hated by some on here.
what does that even mean? You lefties seem to think you're the social and moral conscience for the world and love nothing more than condemning this country for it's "sins" of the past.

Anyway have a good day.
 
let's put a few things right eh. Of course i condemn these killings/murders. I condemn the killing of all innocent citizens caught up in this conflict which was started by Hamas on 7/10 when the calculatedly entered Israel with the sole intention of murdering as many people of all ages as they could.

I will add that there is a massive propaganda war going on and as i said months and months ago that it is one which Israel cannot win. Israel have stated it was a grave error which it was and i condemn them for it. But that's not the topic of discussion started by the o/p is it? I come back to the point which it seems a few of you want to ignore. if Israel weren't able to buy arms from overseas and receive the backing of the USA and a few others, then how long before the israeli nation would be wiped off the face of the earth? or don't you consider that relevant? Let's face it, it's the aim of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houttis in Yemen, Iran and a few other others as well. it's called the bigger picture.
Okay that's much clearer.

Your position is that we (Britain) should continue to supply arms to Israel whatever they do with them even if that includes murdering British civilians.
You think this because to not supply weapons to them would threaten the existence of Israel as a nation.

I personally don't agree with this position.

In addition, you keep repeating the words 'grave error' as if it makes Israeli actions OK. You are repeating IDF propaganda. Be honest and call it what it was. It was murder.
 
I'd suggest that a major conflict going on that is grabbing the worlds attention is a bit more than politics. The boring British politcs of red v blue, left v right that so many of you love to indulge yourselves in on a daily basis.
It's as political as it gets.
 
let's put a few things right eh. Of course i condemn these killings/murders. I condemn the killing of all innocent citizens caught up in this conflict which was started by Hamas on 7/10 when the calculatedly entered Israel with the sole intention of murdering as many people of all ages as they could.

I will add that there is a massive propaganda war going on and as i said months and months ago that it is one which Israel cannot win. Israel have stated it was a grave error which it was and i condemn them for it. But that's not the topic of discussion started by the o/p is it? I come back to the point which it seems a few of you want to ignore. if Israel weren't able to buy arms from overseas and receive the backing of the USA and a few others, then how long before the israeli nation would be wiped off the face of the earth? or don't you consider that relevant? Let's face it, it's the aim of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houttis in Yemen, Iran and a few other others as well. it's called the bigger picture. Perhaps for some on here if it were to happen, well it would be a case of "ah well, they had it coming."
The reality of the current position is that the IDF is intent on wiping the Palestinian people off the face of the Earth. Being surrounded by potential enemies does not give any nation a free hand to operate beyond the law. Those nations that do, need to be brought to account. That is why NATO members are arming Ukraine in their war with Russia.
 
Okay that's much clearer.

Your position is that we (Britain) should continue to supply arms to Israel whatever they do with them even if that includes murdering British civilians.
You think this because to not supply weapons to them would threaten the existence of Israel as a nation.

I personally don't agree with this position.

In addition, you keep repeating the words 'grave error' as if it makes Israeli actions OK. You are repeating IDF propaganda. Be honest and call it what it was. It was murder.
was it pre-determined and planned that the IDF would deliberately and intentionally murder/kill 3 british citizens. some of you seem to think it was whereas i would point out that there is a massive difference between what was intentioned by this IDF missile strike and the deliberate intentions of Hamas on 7/10.
 
was it pre-determined and planned that the IDF would deliberately and intentionally murder/kill 3 british citizens.
Yes it was - by targeting the aid vehicles it was clear that foreign civilians would be killed

i would point out that there is a massive difference between what was intentioned by this IDF missile strike and the deliberate intentions of Hamas on 7/10.
No-one is making a moral equivalence between October the 7th and these murders apart from you. And you are only doing that because you are desperate to find something which will justify these IDF murders.

There isn't a massive difference BTW.
Murder of civilians is murder of civilians whoever is doing it.
 
brilliant distortion and deflection. Well done. Well, no not really it's a load of bollux. The IRA deliberately targetted British soldiers, citizens an politicians. Can you state the IDF deliberately targetted those 3 British citizens knowing that they were travelling in the vehicles. The IRA never apologised for thier crimes of murder, they chose more to celebrate. On the other hand the IDF have said it was a "grave error", which it was.. Absolute shame on you and the others for making such a comparison. Disgusting.
They deliberately targeted the vehicles. They were happy with the collateral damage of 7 overseas nationals if it meant they killed one HAMAS gunman. Except there wasn't one.
 
Looks like the IDF have sacked two officers over the attacks on the aid vehicles. I think that is a sensible move.
Israel needs to be careful IMO as it is not hard to see how any further overeach on their part could become a green light to their enemies for an attack, especially if they did lose their arms aid support from the US, which definitely could I think spark that kind of existential threat to them.
 
Ceasing the supply of arms will have little impact. Debating cease fires in the Commons also has no impact. Voting in by-elections based on a war we have no say in is also a bit daft isn't it. The whole war has been about civilians being killed on both sides and is also one of Hamas's tactics to avoid being wiped out. It's a sad conundrum which doesn't look like ending any time soon.
 
Yes it was - by targeting the aid vehicles it was clear that foreign civilians would be killed


No-one is making a moral equivalence between October the 7th and these murders apart from you. And you are only doing that because you are desperate to find something which will justify these IDF murders.

There isn't a massive difference BTW.
Murder of civilians is murder of civilians whoever is doing it.
that's nonsense, i haven't justified these killings at all.
 
Except I answered it yesterday.
not really. Do you think Israel could survive without arms plus the very thought that other nations are aware that they have support. Let's face it, attacks on Israel are increasing, anti- semitic attacks in this country have risen to off the scale and you seemingly want the world to turn against them. Perhaps you want to isolate them as a pariah state and leave them at the mercy of all those hostile nations that surround them.
 
that's nonsense, i haven't justified these killings at all.
You might not think that. Quite a few people reading your output are getting a very different impression. You and Jaffa are incapable of responding to criticism of Israel without a "yes, but what about 7 October" before you start. It's the kind of argument a child deploys when it gets caught doing something wrong.
 
not really. Do you think Israel could survive without arms plus the very thought that other nations are aware that they have support. Let's face it, attacks on Israel are increasing, anti- semitic attacks in this country have risen to off the scale and you seemingly want the world to turn against them. Perhaps you want to isolate them as a pariah state and leave them at the mercy of all those hostile nations that surround them.
One thing that no-one has mentioned so far is that is that Israel has its own arms industry that makes very sophisticated weaponry.

Britain actually imports more arms from Israel than we export to them.

So to answer your question, they may be better equipped than you think.

If the US stopped funding them then it would cause major problems for them. And that, IMO, is why Israel have today suddenly started to talk about a ceasefire again. A telephone call from Joe Biden is all it took.
 
One thing that no-one has mentioned so far is that is that Israel has its own arms industry that makes very sophisticated weaponry.

Britain actually imports more arms from Israel than we export to them.

So to answer your question, they may be better equipped than you think.

If the US stopped funding them then it would cause major problems for them. And that, IMO, is why Israel have today suddenly started to talk about a ceasefire again. A telephone call from Joe Biden is all it took.
yes I'm sure they are well equipped but as you say and was the point of my post which i thought people avoided was the consequences of losing not only our arms contract but our support too. The same with the USA. Stating the obvious as you say that they need our support and backing. And yes, they have made a major error with the killing of 3 British citizens. But is that enough to isolate them and leave them to the mercy of all it's hostile neighbours. My answer is no but maybe you and one or two others seem to think yes.

By the way, just out of interest, i believe the biggest deal we have for supply of arms is to Saudi Arabia who have an appalling human rights record.
 
They deliberately targeted the vehicles. They were happy with the collateral damage of 7 overseas nationals if it meant they killed one HAMAS gunman. Except there wasn't one.
That really is the point, isn't it? The two options were they wanted to kill aid workers, or they saw the death of aid workers as acceptable to get a Hamas member. Neither is lawful under International law, no matter how much Jaffa, 20's and Lost try to prevaricate.
 
not really. Do you think Israel could survive without arms plus the very thought that other nations are aware that they have support. Let's face it, attacks on Israel are increasing, anti- semitic attacks in this country have risen to off the scale and you seemingly want the world to turn against them. Perhaps you want to isolate them as a pariah state and leave them at the mercy of all those hostile nations that surround them.
The logical progression of that is that Israel can do whatever they like. You surely cannot think that?
 
You might not think that. Quite a few people reading your output are getting a very different impression. You and Jaffa are incapable of responding to criticism of Israel without a "yes, but what about 7 October" before you start. It's the kind of argument a child deploys when it gets caught doing something wrong.
sorry oh pompous one. So events of 7/10 should be wiped off the table and forgotten about! Well yep, that seems to be the case with some.
 
OK, so what would it take for you to withdraw your support?
"withdraw my support"? Well i certainly wouldn't phrase it anything like that. Firstly, I'll say that my "support" counts for nothing. The only people who know my views are those who read them on here. It's the people or countries who have a leading role to play who need to take a firmer grip on the situation. But let me make it clear, that is not by withdrawing our arms deal we have with Israel. Israel have crossed a line but to some extent you could say because they've done that, they now need our backing more than ever. And I'm talking about the nation of Israel, not Netanyahu. I expect he'll be toast at the next election. A solution needs to be found to bring this war to an end and both Hamas and Israel need to find the answers. Remember, whilst all these killings are happening there are still hostages being held in Gaza.
 
In an ideal world we wouldn’t be producing the stuff in the first place….it’s pretty obvious whoever you sell a fighter jet or a bomb/guns etc too is likely to use them for no good really ain’t it… !! 🤦‍♂️…perhaps we should only sell them to nice people ……🤣
 
not really. Do you think Israel could survive without arms plus the very thought that other nations are aware that they have support. Let's face it, attacks on Israel are increasing, anti- semitic attacks in this country have risen to off the scale and you seemingly want the world to turn against them. Perhaps you want to isolate them as a pariah state and leave them at the mercy of all those hostile nations that surround them.
Israel produce 85% of their own arms and ammunition, so I suggest they'd cope.
 
"withdraw my support"? Well i certainly wouldn't phrase it anything like that. Firstly, I'll say that my "support" counts for nothing. The only people who know my views are those who read them on here. It's the people or countries who have a leading role to play who need to take a firmer grip on the situation. But let me make it clear, that is not by withdrawing our arms deal we have with Israel. Israel have crossed a line but to some extent you could say because they've done that, they now need our backing more than ever. And I'm talking about the nation of Israel, not Netanyahu. I expect he'll be toast at the next election. A solution needs to be found to bring this war to an end and both Hamas and Israel need to find the answers. Remember, whilst all these killings are happening there are still hostages being held in Gaza.
So, your support is unequivocal, as they have crossed the line we need to back them even more?

What about all the Palestinians held in jails from the West Bank for years, what about the 300 children shot by the IDF in the West Bank in the last 5 years, are they not as valuable as Israelis held hostage?

The roots of this go back long past last year, you are conveniently forgetting Netanyahu supported Hamas to weaken the PLO, border obsevers saw the build up to the atrocities, and we are lead to believe that the oworld's finest Intelligence agency, Mossad, and its finest Army heard nothing. Naive does not even touch the edges.

We need an immediate ceasefire, and decent principled Israelis need to get rid of Natanyahu and his violent extremist Government. Maybe look at some of the comments by his security minister about the need to violently remove all Palestinians from Gaza to allow Greater Israel. Maybe look at the murders of Palestinians by Settlers in the West Bank, destruction of their homes and schools. Hamas are not the only evil ones in this catastrophe
 
So, your support is unequivocal, as they have crossed the line we need to back them even more?

What about all the Palestinians held in jails from the West Bank for years, what about the 300 children shot by the IDF in the West Bank in the last 5 years, are they not as valuable as Israelis held hostage?

The roots of this go back long past last year, you are conveniently forgetting Netanyahu supported Hamas to weaken the PLO, border obsevers saw the build up to the atrocities, and we are lead to believe that the oworld's finest Intelligence agency, Mossad, and its finest Army heard nothing. Naive does not even touch the edges.

We need an immediate ceasefire, and decent principled Israelis need to get rid of Natanyahu and his violent extremist Government. Maybe look at some of the comments by his security minister about the need to violently remove all Palestinians from Gaza to allow Greater Israel. Maybe look at the murders of Palestinians by Settlers in the West Bank, destruction of their homes and schools. Hamas are not the only evil ones in this catastrophe
yes, i could have perhaps worded part of my post a bit better. It's not a case of backing them even more, ie give them more weapons which is perhaps what you were implying I meant. It's a case of not deserting them which it clearly seems some of you want to do.
 
Israel produce 85% of their own arms and ammunition, so I suggest they'd cope.
missing my point! If the USA and other key supporters withdrew their support, do you think the attacks on Israel would increase? Are some missile attacks still getting through despite some being shot down by the US? Would a land invasion of Israel by surrounding hostile nations be a more likely event knowing that Israel was left standing alone.
 
missing my point! If the USA and other key supporters withdrew their support, do you think the attacks on Israel would increase? Are some missile attacks still getting through despite some being shot down by the US? Would a land invasion of Israel by surrounding hostile nations be a more likely event knowing that Israel was left standing alone.
Israel is more than capable in looking after itself. Anyway, an arms embargo is a different call than a total shunning, as you probably know.
 
Back
Top