.

PdxTangerine said:
Eh, it's a kit, looks fine to me, the players are the ones who have to wear it and I doubt they give a toss, really glad they kept the visit Blackpool though , much better than whatever telewest communications or inenco are, did inenco make that flat orange drink?.
Click to expand...
Yeah this is a huge plus for me, hope we keep Visit Blackpool for many years, a sponsor that symbolises the club now, Blackpool and Proud.
 
1966_and_all_that said:
Well, I will be attending next season's matches in one of three shirts:

1. Warm, spring & summer weather = the v-neck & short sleeve late 50s shirt.
2. Cooler, autumnal weather = the early-mid 60s long sleeve, round-neck shirt.
3. Winter weather = the 1953 shirt.

That's plenty options.
Click to expand...
The 1953 shirt is like wearing a sackcloth.
 
Lytham_fy8 said:
To be fair they came like that, look at the quality of that stitching, classy stuff.
Click to expand...
Do they were designed with the Buddha Fit in mind. Can’t knock that kind of ingenuity to be fair😂

I’m not sure the picture highlights the full shitness of that iconic shirt mind you, it almost looks a reasonable colour, when I recall it appeared to be an awful ‘Salmon Pink’ colour when seen in its full glory.
 
Dollar Thief said:
Just for you.

👍 Puma & Sponsor

👎 Wrong colour, no need for the extra white on the front, save all that for a training top. There's nothing worse than when a team plays around with the shirt design. Just keep it tangerine with white piping/trim. No need to add extra bits here or there just for 'fashion'.

I'd also like to see the tower badge as the crest looks too small when it has Blackpool Football Club wrapped around it.
Click to expand...

Funnily enough, my reasons for not "loving it" are pretty similar. I'm not so sure about the colour not being right however.... I always reserve judgement till I see one in the flesh as phone/ pc screens can be deceptive.

I'd have preferred a plain shirt in "tangerine". But, I don't think they've gone way overboard with the styling. Guess that's where tastes differ.
 
I think it looks good. Especially since we have kept the great sponsor with the tower on rather than some shit company's logo.
 
BFC_BFC_BFC said:
Do they were designed with the Buddha Fit in mind. Can’t knock that kind of ingenuity to be fair😂

I’m not sure the picture highlights the full shitness of that iconic shirt mind you, it almost looks a reasonable colour, when I recall it appeared to be an awful ‘Salmon Pink’ colour when seen in its full glory.
Click to expand...
I've still got one in the house somewhere, it's yellow now and made from a material I've never come across since. It's complete wank to he honest.

Even the scratchy material of that Gola blue kit with the badge running through it a few years later was an improvement.
 
Phil_bfc deux said:
There wouldn't have been much effort going in to sorting the new kit out as its a generic Puma design used by several clubs

Would have been a quick email probably
Click to expand...
Yeah sure, it's not a big deal, but the club needs to sell shirts and make money and the thread just seems kind of crass to me. Juvenile.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top