Added injury time

B

Born tangerine

Well-known member
I see another manager, Arteta is moaning about the added time that is being added on in both half's of the match.
Can you believe the sheer cheek of these clowns. It's because of cheating, diving, players and managers who practise the dark arts from the first minute till the last just why VAR was brought in for.
Arteta wasn't moaning when they equalised in the 98th min against city at Wembley.
The championship last season was exactly the same which was discussed on here.
 
Born tangerine said:
I see another manager, Arteta is moaning about the added time that is being added on in both half's of the match.
Can you believe the sheer cheek of these clowns. It's because of cheating, diving, players and managers who practise the dark arts from the first minute till the last just why VAR was brought in for.
Arteta wasn't moaning when they equalised in the 98th min against city at Wembley.
The championship last season was exactly the same which was discussed on here.
Click to expand...
One minute added the first half of our game and one injury took almost twice that on its own.
 
I agree with it in principle, however it will inevitably lead to more injuries and the allocated squad sizes / number of substitutes won’t change. They need to consider it’s like playing about 5 to 6 extra full matches a season, so a 51 or 52 match season, not including the cups and play-offs.
 
Last edited:
Quite liked it in the World Cup. But think it's overkill for regular league matches. Maybe for league matches they could apply a maximum (where there hasn't been a serious injury) of say 6 minutes?
 
tangerine_neil said:
I agree with it in principle, however it will inevitably lead to more injuries and the allocated squad sizes / number of substitutes won’t change. They need to consider it’s like playing about 5 to 6 extra full matches a season, so a 51 or 52 match season, not including the cups and play-offs.
Click to expand...
If they didn’t piss and fart about at every opportunity, there would be minimal time added on. It’s up to them.
 
My concern is that it could end up slowing the games down, with players trying to conserve energy so that they can play the extra 15 minutes or so, so a lot more aimless passing at the back, with no real pressing by the opposition, and I'm not sure if this'll be an improvement.
 
tangerine_neil said:
I agree with it in principle, however it will inevitably lead to more injuries and the allocated squad sizes / number of substitutes won’t change. They need to consider it’s like playing about 5 to 6 extra full matches a season, so a 51 or 52 match season, not including the cups and play-offs.
Click to expand...
Doesn't stop the big clubs fulfilling their sponsorship commitments with Far East tours over the summer.
 
Born tangerine said:
I see another manager, Arteta is moaning about the added time that is being added on in both half's of the match.
Can you believe the sheer cheek of these clowns. It's because of cheating, diving, players and managers who practise the dark arts from the first minute till the last just why VAR was brought in for.
Arteta wasn't moaning when they equalised in the 98th min against city at Wembley.
The championship last season was exactly the same which was discussed on here.
Click to expand...
Halves btw.
 
Ten Haag takes some beating for moaning. Bleating about not getting a pen for handball against Spurs, after his goalkeeper nearly decapitated the Wolves forward.
 
tangerine_neil said:
I agree with it in principle, however it will inevitably lead to more injuries and the allocated squad sizes / number of substitutes won’t change. They need to consider it’s like playing about 5 to 6 extra full matches a season, so a 51 or 52 match season, not including the cups and play-offs.
Click to expand...
Maybe players will stop unnecessary rolling about the floor like silly twats then
 
Simonized said:
One minute added the first half of our game and one injury took almost twice that on its own.
Click to expand...
That was weird on Saturday and can only presume they've had a big old re-think because the contrast from that first game when there were 7 mins added on time to 1 min added on with a lengthy injury on Saturday was huge.
That said where they got the added on time in the second half feck knows (although we could have been there until Midnight and still not scored!).
 
When you have away teams wasting time from the start and the added time is based on that time wasting then if that team is a goal behind they do not get the added time in the 2nd half so maybe 8 mins is reduced to 2.
 
Hooked1964 said:
When you have away teams wasting time from the start and the added time is based on that time wasting then if that team is a goal behind they do not get the added time in the 2nd half so maybe 8 mins is reduced to 2.
Click to expand...
I doubt the ref keeps a record of which team is doing the time-wasting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top