I think it's a sideshow TS, to be honest.Bit disappointing in some ways.
Would have kept the saga going for a longer.
Now he's just a twice convicted fraudster who has taken money from vulnerable groups and businesses and pumped it into his play thing.
Now there's a can of worms.I think it's a sideshow TS, to be honest.
The real issue here is about whether FTFC is, or was, subsidised by the proceeds of crime. The answer to that question may have far reaching implications.
Could be an interesting test case for English football more widely.
Could be a whole bucket, Mac.Now there's a can of worms.
Can you really see the EFL wanting to expose their own incompetence?I think it's a sideshow TS, to be honest.
The real issue here is about whether FTFC is, or was, subsidised by the proceeds of crime. The answer to that question may have far reaching implications.
Could be an interesting test case for English football more widely.
Again?Can you really see the EFL wanting to expose their own incompetence?
If the SOCA puts information into the public domain, I don't think what the EFL prefers is the issue.Can you really see the EFL wanting to expose their own incompetence?
Again?