captain tom part 3.

J

JOHNMAJORTOM

Well-known member
Our favourite charity chancer MRS handout me moore money was at a hearing yesterday to find out whether she and the rest of the moore moneys can keep their spa pool swimming thing. and meanwhile the Captain TOM foundation will be wrapped up. not before plod investigates and finds them guilty of fraud. probsbly not. wishful thinking. she is getting torn to pieces on TIKTOK. not that that is anything to go by. But people are pretty angry that we have all been taken for mugs. 🤢 🤢
 
When Tom was alive, and being interviewed on TV or in the newspapers she was always there front and centre.

Tom was old school, and all he wanted was to say thank you to the NHS for all the care he'd received.

I hope she enjoys the money she's made, and doesn't lose too much sleep besmirching the legacy of her dad
 
We will never get the full facts of Toms involvement, think he will have known of his daughters intentions. It wont be the last time a charity cons the public, infact most are sheepish at saying where the money goes, most will be sitting in bank accounts or buying property just to get a better return.
 
I'd probably be accused of Whataboutery if my target was anybody else but I couldn't give a sh1t about what Sir Captain Tom's daughter does with her 800 large while Michelle Mone is not under lock and key.
 
The £38million that Capt Tom raised did all go to charity… well, to the NHS which probably filled a few local austerity cuts by the Dept of Health.
 
Last edited:
And their £ has been used to build the spar though that inc the book royalties
The trustees issue over the spar is that the foundation didn’t know they used their name to support the planning app
It’s a strange building that’s for sure
 
Archibald Knox said:
The £38million that Capt Tom raised did all go to charity… well, to the NHS which probably filled a few local austerity cuts by the Dept of Health.
Click to expand...
No it went to NHS Charities (each trust has one) and lots of it was spent on well-being activities for the staff.

Nothing ever to prop up the NHS.
 
TwelveAngryMen said:
And their £ has been used to build the spar though that inc the book royalties
The trustees issue over the spar is that the foundation didn’t know they used their name to support the planning app
It’s a strange building that’s for sure
Click to expand...
She's now claiming it's for the benefit of elderly people in the surrounding area. Yeah course it is love.

They've gone from her husband's business failing at the time to pretty much millionaires. Clearly the whole thing was devised to get them out of a huge financial hole. And it worked. Whatever investigations happen they will waltz off into the sunset with bags of cash.
 
Macseasider said:
They've gone from her husband's business failing at the time to pretty much millionaires. Clearly the whole thing was devised to get them out of a huge financial hole. And it worked. Whatever investigations happen they will waltz off into the sunset with bags of cash.
Click to expand...

Well Capt Tom's house is worth way more than £1m, so is the spa. And then Tom had a holiday home in the Med. So I don't think his daughter will be struggling to make ends meet. It's the wealthy ones that tend to be the first with the money making schemes. Obviously.
 
and for your viewing schedule . Channel 5 will be showing a handout me moore money doc . where did it all go . before XMAS. Get the recorders on folks. 😀 😀 😀
 
OUR FAVOURITE charity chiseller has finaly got it back in her face. Handout ME MOORE MONEY and her two barreled name ingham whatsiface . rthew most despised people in the country have PULL IT DOWN. JUSTICE at last for genuine people who gave to what they thought was a woethwhile cause.
 
Given the increased size of the building they put up (2000 sq ft) I reckon this was subterfuge to build a new dwelling which otherwise would have been refused planning permission. The position was right on the edge of their land backing directly onto the end of a cul-de-sac.

If they had got away with this and got retrospective approval for the “Spa” then, a few years hence, they probably would have applied for conversion to a house given the robust construction. 2000 sq ft is enough for three beds with a courtyard in the U-shape. And probably £500k+.

It happens a fair amount around us in the green belt where planning permission is restricted. Someone with a few acres will apply to build a stables. The stables that go up are luxury, block work with stone wall facings and a pitched slate roof with windows, all for horses! Then three,four or five years later they will apply for outline planning permission for conversion.

They think they are fooling the thick planners, because local planning laws say that new animal barns etc in the green belt should be agricultural construction of wooden walls and corrugated steel roofs, on purpose, so they cannot be converted later. But the councils are so short of budget they will turn a blind eye if there are no complaints, in the hopes of later getting a new property attracting more council tax. And they invariably approve conversion if the building quality is good enough.

So, kudos to this local authority for refusing to collaborate with Hannah Ingram-Moore.

Though it’s possible her husband, while keeping a low profile, is putting her up to a lot of it.
 
Last edited:
Archibald Knox said:
Given the increased size of the building they put up (2000 sq ft) I reckon this was subterfuge to build a new dwelling which otherwise would have been refused planning permission. The position was right on the edge of their land backing directly onto the end of a cul-de-sac.

If they had got away with this and got retrospective approval for the “Spa” then, a few years hence, they probably would have applied for conversion to a house given the robust construction. 2000 sq ft is enough for three beds with a courtyard in the U-shape. And probably £500k+.

It happens a fair amount around us in the green belt where planning permission is restricted. Someone with a few acres will apply to build a stables. The stables that go up are luxury, block work with stone wall facings and a pitched slate roof with windows, all for horses! Then three,four or five years later they will apply for outline planning permission for conversion.

They think they are fooling the thick planners, because local planning laws say that new animal barns etc in the green belt should be agricultural construction of wooden walls and corrugated steel roofs, on purpose, so they cannot be converted later. But the councils are so short of budget they will turn a blind eye if there are no complaints, in the hopes of later getting a new property attracting more council tax. And they invariably approve conversion if the building quality is good enough.

So, kudos to this local authority for refusing to collaborate with Hannah Ingram-Moore.

Though it’s possible her husband, while keeping a low profile, is putting her up to a lot of it.
Click to expand...
mmmm... interesting take on it. 👍
 
Archibald Knox said:
Given the increased size of the building they put up (2000 sq ft) I reckon this was subterfuge to build a new dwelling which otherwise would have been refused planning permission. The position was right on the edge of their land backing directly onto the end of a cul-de-sac.

If they had got away with this and got retrospective approval for the “Spa” then, a few years hence, they probably would have applied for conversion to a house given the robust construction. 2000 sq ft is enough for three beds with a courtyard in the U-shape. And probably £500k+.

It happens a fair amount around us in the green belt where planning permission is restricted. Someone with a few acres will apply to build a stables. The stables that go up are luxury, block work with stone wall facings and a pitched slate roof with windows, all for horses! Then three,four or five years later they will apply for outline planning permission for conversion.

They think they are fooling the thick planners, because local planning laws say that new animal barns etc in the green belt should be agricultural construction of wooden walls and corrugated steel roofs, on purpose, so they cannot be converted later. But the councils are so short of budget they will turn a blind eye if there are no complaints, in the hopes of later getting a new property attracting more council tax. And they invariably approve conversion if the building quality is good enough.

So, kudos to this local authority for refusing to collaborate with Hannah Ingram-Moore.

Though it’s possible her husband, while keeping a low profile, is putting her up to a lot of it.
Click to expand...
True enough. 'Stables' were built near us. Single storey but with double glazing and standard doors. Two years later it's a children's nursery.
 
tangerine_neil said:
I certainly don’t believe Capt Tom devised anything. But that daughter of his was quick to jump on the opportunity it presented
Click to expand...
There needed to be some clever publicity about this. I am sure Tom was sincere but the opportunity should have always been local
 
well BLACKPOOL peeps. CHANNEL 5 SUNDAY At a9.pm. Where did the money go. yes MRS handout me moore money. WHERE is it you scammimng c..w.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top