Nice touches, wasn't in the game as much as he could have been.Could not see the game today - how did Charlie do
Why was someone stood in front of youCould not see the game today - how did Charlie do
He’s gonna be ridiculousCould not see the game today - how did Charlie do
Christ, give it time.Nice touches, wasn't in the game as much as he could have been.
A few times people bypassed him only to lose it like Marv booting it to no-one.
What's the point in having the lad on if we aren't going to use him as much.
Give it time? The game is over, we lost.Christ, give it time.
It takes time to blend a team and takes time for players to see how others play.Give it time? The game is over, we lost.
Not sure you understand my post.
He looked good but could have been given the ball more, but instead we hoofed it at times we didn't need to.
No it doesn’t take any time if Charlie started the game we would have had a better chance of getting something fact.It takes time to blend a team and takes time for players to see how others play.
Maybe you're right, perhaps Appleton could learn a thing or two from you.No it doesn’t take any time if Charlie started the game we would have had a better chance of getting something fact.
If you play your best players you have a better chance of winning. Try be a clever Cnut all you want.Maybe you're right, perhaps Appleton could learn a thing or two from you.
Opinion is not fact. A fact is provable with empirical evidence.
Absolutely no need for that, maybe the manager knows more than you.If you play your best players you have a better chance of winning. Try be a clever Cnut all you want.
Yes ,the point of the post was answering the op, to say he looked good, but could have been in the game more had he been passed to more.It takes time to blend a team and takes time for players to see how others play.