Iran attacks Israel.

Did I say that?

What I am saying is you can charge as many people/countries as you want with war crimes but at the end of the day it’s not worth the paper it’s written on.
I suppose the real question is, how many offences and how many convicted?

I have a funny feeling it will be a huge difference.
 
BBC says at least 110, everyone else reporting 120.
Surprising.


Sorry I thought I was clear, cannons from land sea and air - some have ranges up to 35km - you don’t need to use a million dollar module to take out a drone.

Some system can fire hyper accurate 120 rounds a second a very long way away.
A USN 16"/50 gun off an Iowa class battleship has a range only marginally greater than that, and that's against a surface target, and I promise you that nobody has anything close to that size in service these days.

I'd be interested to know what system you are thinking of that has capabilities far beyond anything I've ever heard of.


Nope - not anymore. Look up the capability of the Israel navy.

Typhoons, F35s, F15s and 16s all have highly effective cannons - especially when shooting at something slow!
I have, I can't find anything close to what you're suggesting.

Re: planes, they have limited ammunition, and for that matter limited endurance, they can get some, but I have a hard time imagining they'll get into double-digit numbers, so against 1,000+ drones, a bit of a problem.

Also, I'm not aware of any reports of drones being engaged by aircraft gunfire during the attack, so I'll go with what the RAF/USAF/IAF did in practice, rather than what you think they should have done.


I have explained that already.
Go look up the specs again, or for the first time!
Incorrectly, IMO, and without links to sources, or indeed details of the weapons platforms that you are referring to.

This is an area of interest to me, it is unlikely that I am wrong.
 
Any system can be overwhelmed obviously!
Just to add - if Israel fired 500 missiles using the figure you gave and the midpoint of 125k usd, it cost about $62.5m USD and not the billion you floated originally.
Can you spot the link between the two points?

Because the Iron Dome system is short ranged and can be overwhelmed, they have to use more expensive air launched, or longer ranged ground launched missiles to compensate, so that pushes up the cost substantially.

So, a Patriot is $4m, an AMRAAM is $1m, a shot from the Iron Dome is $125k, so you could spend anywhere between $62.5m - $2bn depending upon the mix, and with the limitations of the ID system, my guess is that $1bn is a reasonable estimate for the overall cost of the operation.
 
Surprising.



A USN 16"/50 gun off an Iowa class battleship has a range only marginally greater than that, and that's against a surface target, and I promise you that nobody has anything close to that size in service these days.

I'd be interested to know what system you are thinking of that has capabilities far beyond anything I've ever heard of.



I have, I can't find anything close to what you're suggesting.

Re: planes, they have limited ammunition, and for that matter limited endurance, they can get some, but I have a hard time imagining they'll get into double-digit numbers, so against 1,000+ drones, a bit of a problem.

Also, I'm not aware of any reports of drones being engaged by aircraft gunfire during the attack, so I'll go with what the RAF/USAF/IAF did in practice, rather than what you think they should have done.




Incorrectly, IMO, and without links to sources, or indeed details of the weapons platforms that you are referring to.

This is an area of interest to me, it is unlikely that I am wrong.
It is unlikely you are wrong 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Let’s start…

You had no idea how many BMs were fired
You had no idea how many BMs were shot down
You were quoting prices for missiles to bring stuff down that were laughable initially (again no idea of reality - in fairness I don’t know what they cost - but I didn’t quote it)
You really have no idea of the Israel defence capability
You need to look up laser guided cannons that can be fired 30ish km plus with high accuracy.

Put bluntly your initial responses were so inaccurate I cannot be bothered, now you have found Google and still talking, well….

Enjoy posting next, as no doubt it’s your vinegar stroke 🤣👍

I am out of here - when you post next everyone knows what you are doing and thinking 👍🤣🤣🤣

Enjoy your moment!l - UTMP always 👍
 
It is unlikely you are wrong 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Let’s start…

You had no idea how many BMs were fired
You had no idea how many BMs were shot down
You were quoting prices for missiles to bring stuff down that were laughable initially (again no idea of reality - in fairness I don’t know what they cost - but I didn’t quote it)
You really have no idea of the Israel defence capability
You need to look up laser guided cannons that can be fired 30ish km plus with high accuracy.

Put bluntly your initial responses were so inaccurate I cannot be bothered, now you have found Google and still talking, well….

Enjoy posting next, as no doubt it’s your vinegar stroke 🤣👍

I am out of here - when you post next everyone knows what you are doing and thinking 👍🤣🤣🤣

Enjoy your moment!l - UTMP always 👍
Still no link to these magical weapon systems that you think can shoot down drones at 30p a pop.

You have literally no idea what you are talking about.
 
@seasideone

Ex army officer making much the same points as me: Suicide drones threaten to bankrupt Western militaries

The most dramatic attack to date using Iranian drones came, of course, this weekend. Repelling that bombardment is estimated to have cost up to 1.5 billion dollars, a significant amount of which must have been expended on downing the drones.

Some of the missiles that have been used to intercept these drones can cost upwards of a million dollars a shot and sometimes much more. In broad terms, the earlier on the flight path they can be knocked out of the sky, the better the chances of preventing them from hitting the target, but the higher the price tag.

Until technology can be developed to dramatically reduce the disproportionate cost of neutralising drones, air defence systems can still only be seen as a partial response.



But of course you know better. 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
 
Did I say that?

What I am saying is you can charge as many people/countries as you want with war crimes but at the end of the day it’s not worth the paper it’s written on.
Tell That to Slobodan Milošević, who died in prison before his trial ended, and Radovan Karadžić, Ratko Mladić, and Slobodan Praljak, all of whom were convicted of war crimes.
 
Tell That to Slobodan Milošević, who died in prison before his trial ended, and Radovan Karadžić, Ratko Mladić, and Slobodan Praljak, all of whom were convicted of war crimes.
Same war as I’ve already mentioned earlier.

Can you name any more convicted of war crimes other than from the Bosnian/Serb war?
 
Last edited:
Same war as I’ve already mentioned earlier.

Can you name any more convicted of war crimes other than from the Bosnian/Serb war?
Herman Goering, and quite a few of the others in the senior NAZI leadership, although this was some time ago.

Personally, I think Karl Doenitz should've been exonerated, and the tribunal seems to mostly have agreed.
 
Last edited:
Breaking news this morning is it looks like Israel has overnight attacked a nuclear plant in Iran with a missile arrack. 🚀
That news is from the Americans the Iranians have said all the missile fired were brought down.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top