I've reached my limit!

Should Critchley be sent packing?

  • Yes

    Votes: 126 58.6%
  • No

    Votes: 91 42.3%

  • Total voters
    215
Big player problems and issues with players contract as ip to 13 or more players who have there contracts coming to a end.So where does Sadler go next as there is a lot of sorting out to do as possibly the majority of players could opt out not renew and find another club with more money on the table.as we all know unfortunately Football is buisness related sport and as we know Sadler will not have a gun held to his i head in regards to offering players over the going rate and the same as transfer fees as well Sadler prefers to operate in the loan market as well as free transfers if he can.well we all know that he has the dream Manager in. Regards to saving money on transfer fees as well as wages with the fist puncher being a yes sir No sir 3 bags full member enough said on that note wishing the box of toys you know who you are a very prosperous new year in Lk trust
'... well we all know that he has the dream Manager in.'

I'm very much hoping, Lk, that was said/typed with a heavy dose of irony. Based on the tone of the points which immediately precede, and follow, the relevant passage, I think it's actually safe to the quality of 'irony' is pretty much to the fore in the language you employ, so, I suppose you could argue the case, my raising the issue serves little purpose, beyond easing my own slightly furrowed brow. Which, thankfully, it has. And apologies, if this is a straight case of 'me' almost missing your rather deft employment of irony as a subtle means of making the point Critch is actually the perfect candidate for supporting Sadler in his occasionally rather parsimonious ways.

Maybe I'm a closet US citizen - because don't they say Americans have no sense irony? And how ironic would that be, given the express point I had originally set out to make!?
 
'... well we all know that he has the dream Manager in.'

I'm very much hoping, Lk, that was said/typed with a heavy dose of irony. Based on the tone of the points which immediately precede, and follow, the relevant passage, I think it's actually safe to the quality of 'irony' is pretty much to the fore in the language you employ, so, I suppose you could argue the case, my raising the issue serves little purpose, beyond easing my own slightly furrowed brow. Which, thankfully, it has. And apologies, if this is a straight case of 'me' almost missing your rather deft employment of irony as a subtle means of making the point Critch is actually the perfect candidate for supporting Sadler in his occasionally rather parsimonious ways.

Maybe I'm a closet US citizen - because don't they say Americans have no sense irony? And how ironic would that be, given the express point I had originally set out to make!?
F me, are you in court or on a message board.
 
I voted yes when he first arrived , but I believe that although I don't like him or his tactics , I feel we have been unlucky in a number of games and I also feel as a team we are improving . This may change if Rhodes and Dembele go without suitable replacements . Yet we have to remember that he has brought them into this side and both have been excellent . So I would stick with Critch for now and see how things develop.
 
Back
Top