thecatintheroof
Well-known member
For me, aside from his injury, the best of the loans last season - was linked with Hibs about a month ago - probably don't need him now but wonder where he'll end up?
Not even close to being as good as Morgan Rogers. A decent player yes but far too lightweight and slow.For me, aside from his injury, the best of the loans last season - was linked with Hibs about a month ago - probably don't need him now but wonder where he'll end up?
Why do you need to be quick as a central midfielder? It's literally one of the least attributes you require.Not even close to being as good as Morgan Rogers. A decent player yes but far too lightweight and slow.
Pace is pretty important in every position. I rated him, just not as highly as Morgan Rogers.Why do you need to be quick as a central midfielder? It's literally one of the least attributes you require.
I can think of about 7 of Blackpools best CMs in my life and none of them had "pace" so it isn't the most important attribute.Pace is pretty important in every position. I rated him, just not as highly as Morgan Rogers.
Charlie did alright and I don’t think he’ll be competing with Hamilton for pace. I also know which one I would prefer in my team.Pace is pretty important in every position. I rated him, just not as highly as Morgan Rogers.
Ha, I'm not digging out Fiorini, there is no chance he's coming back. He is slow, he is lightweight, he was injury prone, he wasn't as good as Morgan Rogers. The OP said he was the best of the loans, I disagree. Both Rogers and Patino were better.Charlie did alright and I don’t think he’ll be competing with Hamilton for pace. I also know which one I would prefer in my team.
I think the best attributes for Central Midfielders are, stamina, reading a game, strong tackling, and making clean passes to the runners up- front.I can think of about 7 of Blackpools best CMs in my life and none of them had "pace" so it isn't the most important attribute.
Richard Keogh disagrees with your first statement...Pace is pretty important in every position. I rated him, just not as highly as Morgan Rogers.
Are you serious, have you ever played there or coached? It’s a vital area for pace, even if only over 10 yards ala Charlie Adam.Why do you need to be quick as a central midfielder? It's literally one of the least attributes you require.
Not sure I agree with this for a CM. I get that initial 5 or 10 yard argument but I'd argue that's more anticipation and reading of the game rather than actual pace. Suppose it depends on the type of CM you are though so maybe half true.Are you serious, have you ever played there or coached? It’s a vital area for pace, even if only over 10 yards ala Charlie Adam.
Look at Matty, lots of talent, but unable to close down or burst away from players. Forever arriving after the ball has been moved on. Same can be said of Patino, chasing shadows. If he had pace Arsenal would be keeping him.
Bottom line as a pro is that you can have all the talent, but if you don’t have enough pace your career is limited.
How much pace you need depends on the level you are playing at. You can watch super talented players in National League and below, but they don’t have pace and that’s why they play at that level. They are great doing things at their own pace.Not sure I agree with this for a CM. I get that initial 5 or 10 yard argument but I'd argue that's more anticipation and reading of the game rather than actual pace. Suppose it depends on the type of CM you are though so maybe half true.
This post is bollocks. Sorry but it really is. For a thousand reasons.How much pace you need depends on the level you are playing at. You can watch super talented players in National League and below, but they don’t have pace and that’s why they play at that level. They are great doing things at their own pace.
CM at pro level requires enough pace and it’s why we’ve struggled last season. We simply couldn’t dominate in midfield, because we didn’t have the pace to break through or close down. The ball moves so quickly as do most of the opposition players. We were constantly chasing shadows.
If Patino had pace then Arsenal would not be letting him go. Fiorini is blessed with more pace and although he’s not as clever, he’s got a good pass and has scope, just not PL level.
You talk bollocks pal, on most things, usually about CJ.This post is bollocks. Sorry but it really is. For a thousand reasons.
We were shite in midfield because of a lack of quality, strength on the ball. Next to fuck all to do with pace.
I'm so clueless about CJ in saying he isn't good enough for the Championship we can't bat away enough offers? The guy is dogshit. You know zilch about football it seems. On the block list, I don't need to read utterly thick peoples opinions.You talk bollocks pal, on most things, usually about CJ.
So you’re saying we lacked quality with Patino & Fiorini. That’s laughable, they’ve got so much talent and it’s why they have spent their years at City & Arsenal. What hold their careers back is the lack of pace, particularly so with Patino.
Clueless pal.
Yes, it’s why I coach at a high level in youth football and we’ve just won the double and have boys going on to better things.I'm so clueless about CJ in saying he isn't good enough for the Championship we can't bat away enough offers? The guy is dogshit. You know zilch about football it seems. On the block list, I don't need to read utterly thick peoples opinions.
Tbf it's your opinion and that's all. Coaches at all levels have opinions and ideas about whether players are good or not and what makes for a good player. Your perfectly entitled to think your right and not pick someone in CM cos in your opinion he doesn't have the pace to play there, I'm perfectly entitled to think that's bollocks and that ultimately technique and vision win the day. It's no different to Mick McCarthy and Pep Guardiola, both have totally different opinions on what attributes suit, neither is necessarily right or wrong, just different.Yes, it’s why I coach at a high level in youth football and we’ve just won the double and have boys going on to better things.
I was agreeing with you until you compared McCarthy to Pep, the former was blatantly wrong in his time with us.Tbf it's your opinion and that's all. Coaches at all levels have opinions and ideas about whether players are good or not and what makes for a good player. Your perfectly entitled to think your right and not pick someone in CM cos in your opinion he doesn't have the pace to play there, I'm perfectly entitled to think that's bollocks and that ultimately technique and vision win the day. It's no different to Mick McCarthy and Pep Guardiola, both have totally different opinions on what attributes suit, neither is necessarily right or wrong, just different.
I was purely using two opposites to make a point. I hated McCarthy and I think he got everything wrong and I am totally opposed to that style of play in any way shape or form but some managers with that way of thinking have been successful sometimes.I was agreeing with you until you compared McCarthy to Pep, the former was blatantly wrong in his time with us.
It's alright Rodri is rapid. And Busquets. And KDB. And Eriksen. And Modric is also extremely quick in his late age.Tbf it's your opinion and that's all. Coaches at all levels have opinions and ideas about whether players are good or not and what makes for a good player. Your perfectly entitled to think your right and not pick someone in CM cos in your opinion he doesn't have the pace to play there, I'm perfectly entitled to think that's bollocks and that ultimately technique and vision win the day. It's no different to Mick McCarthy and Pep Guardiola, both have totally different opinions on what attributes suit, neither is necessarily right or wrong, just different.
Disagree Rogers took ages to settle in.Not even close to being as good as Morgan Rogers. A decent player yes but far too lightweight and slow.
So did Fiorini given he got injured at the point he started to play OK.Disagree Rogers took ages to settle in.