BFC_53
Well-known member
I hope the board are putting a lot of time and effort into this, and don't go for yet another lazy appointment. I'd rather have someone I've never heard of than most of the names suggested on here, where there seems to be a lot of tunnel vision in terms of thinking only the same old names are who we could get. Like it or not, Critchley was an ambitious, risky appointment that paid massive dividends. We persuaded him to leave the then English champions, working with some of the best youngsters in the country, to come to us. I wouldn't have him back, but I think we need to be similarly ambitious and bold. The only manager we've appointed that didn't have any managerial experience is the only one that worked. Yes, he needed an experienced assistant, but it brought success because it fitted with a coherent strategy and I think we need to get back to that, which is what the board stated they'd be doing in the recent SDM. I've no idea why they deviated from it.