Not a good look

Kyle Seasider said:
We will see what happens, all I'm saying is that I can see this being another headache for the club. Like someone else has said on here, once the Muckers get hold of this it will be brought up in fan meetings.
Click to expand...
It sounds like it/him/her/them were already a headache for the club, and that’s why they were blocked.

As for the Muckers taking the club to hand again, 🤭
 
Wizaard said:
Free speech comes with responsibilities to behave appropriately. Social media can be a hotbed of abuse masquerading as free speech.
Click to expand...
I have heard so but as I don’t do any of it I wouldn’t know. I should have qualified my remarks about free speech to exclude, anything homophobic, racist, sexist etc. As you say we all have responsibility for our own words and should treat each other with respect, even when disagreeing with them. Which is what I try to do, in some cases this is very difficult. Hence the ignore button.😁
 
paulco said:
Critchley has said he can take criticism.

People who dislike Critch bought season tickets, rather than threaten boycotts.

Now some among mugs call him names.

Terrible food - with the portions too small.

Away league form, poor selections and tactics justify my anti-Critch stance.

But Pool should only ban fans - at the ground and on Twitter - for violent threats.
Click to expand...
FUCK OFF YOU FUCKWIT.
 
BlackpoolFC said:
If people get personal about the manager why not block them. Nobody has the right to be vile to a professional doing their job. Some fans think they’re billet proof and can say what they want. They can’t.
Click to expand...
Not sure the criticism was vile but you probably know better than me
 
They don't ban just anyone ,because half our websites are covered in Critch insults . He must have done or said something bad to get banned . Will we ever know ,probably not.
 
BlackpoolFC said:
If people get personal about the manager why not block them. Nobody has the right to be vile to a professional doing their job. Some fans think they’re billet proof and can say what they want. They can’t.
Click to expand...
Some fans think they’re billet proof?

Tangerine boot camp for critics?
 
There were multiple times when I tweeted at the club after a loss telling them that the team makes me want to kill myself sometimes and they still didn't block me LOL.

Think it's fair to say that their bar for tolerance is actually pretty high so I'm just going to assume that whoever was blocked went waaay overboard.

The club do not and should not tolerate all online fan behavior and some on here are making a FAR bigger deal about this than it actually is.
 
Macseasider said:
I've always found on all Social Media that if you aren't a complete bellend then you never get blocked, banned, suspended.
Click to expand...
Depends on who it is and how sensitive they are. I got blocked by Trevor Sinclair for liking a tweet where somebody had pointed out he was being hypocritical. That was enough for him. 😂
 
Tbh blocking customer critiscm of the product being offered would be out of order but calling a member of staff a snake is pretty offensive .
 
I've never been blocked on anything including Twatter probably because I don't bother with it 🙄
 
I am more shocked it's not me with my views on his love child and shoehorning CJ into a wing-back position, which he will never be competent at.
 
Don't blame them myself - it becomes tiring to read negativity (and usually with language that I find unpalatable) - what's the old adage - if you have nothing good to say? Personally, like posts when we do well, don't when we don't - that's the only message you need.
P.S. I am surprised the club even read the messages tbh!
 
One man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist. As far as BFC my business I’m paying the bills and if I don’t think you are worthy of my business I ban you. Don’t see anything unfair in that.
 
Wizaard said:
Yet freedom of expression is used as an excuse for all kinds of abuse. There are limits.
Click to expand...
Of course, I clarified this in an earlier post. My point is you will never change anybody’s skewed view on things if you don’t listen to what they say. Banning them merely strengthens their view they’re right and are being suppressed for their views.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top