OT Mark Catlin

P

Plumbs

Guest
Portsmouth owner-who's now come out and spoken against the salary cap, and from a club that became synonymous with getting heavily into debt to achieve success.
He very carefully dismisses the path they've come down and is doing the 'too big for this division' talk, plus he seems more interested in the huge wages gap opening up between L1 and the Championship-my advice would be to worry about that when you get there.

In his interview with the FSA (link supplied) he talks of " Robust mechanisms need to be in place to ensure that clubs ‘cheating’ or breaking governing body sustainability rules are dealt with severely and rapidly. There needs to be confidence in clubs that those not abiding by regulations are going to suffer the consequences and not be allowed to benefit ‘on the pitch’ via their actions." which seems entirely hypocritical given the interview, as it was the clubs who voted on this clear 'robust mechanism'.

The EFL clubs have three times now voted on 'robust mechanisms' and a salary cap seems to be last throw of the dice,but this seems like just another owner who wants it to go his clubs way,and so-it would appear-is supported by the FSA who campaign against the need for 'robust mechanisms' to be in place.
 
You have got to laugh, really. If we want a sustainable game then a 2.5 million wage cap in League 1 is absolutely the right way to go. I was pleased for Pompey when their fans saved them, but now it’s back to the same old “we’re too big for this league”.

If they were to go up, they would have the worst ground in the Champ, which they would again do nothing about whilst spaffing money up the wall on average players. Their gates, even if the ground was full, would be nothing special given that half the teams in the Champ average 20,000 at home now. And yet they still think they are a special case. A club with passionate support, yes, but not a special case.
 
It's a weird one and I can see others point of view.

Completely hypothetical - if one club, Sunderland say, averaged crowds of 50k and generated turnover that left a 50m positive figure in the P/L column does it seem odd that they are restricted to only spend the same level of wages as Accrington and Fleetwood?
 
It's a weird one and I can see others point of view.

Completely hypothetical - if one club, Sunderland say, averaged crowds of 50k and generated turnover that left a 50m positive figure in the P/L column does it seem odd that they are restricted to only spend the same level of wages as Accrington and Fleetwood?
It would seem odd, but it doesn’t seem to happen that way. The bigger the club, the bigger the spending addiction it seems, they are usually the worst offenders. If they did manage to average huge gates and profits, it hard to imagine they’d be in league 1. They’re here through mismanagement.
 
Salary cap is bad and anti competitive.

I wouldn’t be surprised if this ended up in court as it is probably illegal.
 
It would seem odd, but it doesn’t seem to happen that way. The bigger the club, the bigger the spending addiction it seems, they are usually the worst offenders. If they did manage to average huge gates and profits, it hard to imagine they’d be in league 1. They’re here through mismanagement.
Sunderland might actually for once make a profit which they can then blow if they get promoted. In the meantime they can build up cash reserves and not get in the dire position of the last decade.
Salary cap is a must!
 
Back
Top