Sarah Vine


Sarah Vine, wife of wobbly faced turncoat and anti-expert Michael Gove appears to have written a column in The Daily Mail saying that few have paid such a heavy cost for Brexit as Sarah Vine. I'm not 100% sure because I could not read it all, I was so astonished by it.

I've not read it but I'd hazard a snowflake type reaction "boohoo no one talks to me because they say my husband is a lying ....." type of stuff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Sarah Vine
You like someone who has used her extreme privilege as a journalist to write a piece that could be subtitled 'Do you know who I feel sorry for in all this, me?' It is her own husband who has been one of the main architects of Brexit and we are meant to feel sorry for her. She even managed to worm her way onto thought for today to explain why her husband isn't the spoon we all think he is.
 
So she deserves to get abuse because of what her husband does for a living - a job he is elected to do?

A policeman's wife is fair game?
A soldier's husband?

That's a strange outlook.
 
So she deserves to get abuse because of what her husband does for a living - a job he is elected to do?

A policeman's wife is fair game?
A soldier's husband?

That's a strange outlook.
She's a bellend who defends her husbands lies in a national paper. If she was married to a copper who served at Hillsborough, but repeatedly blamed fans how would you judge her? She's a cxnt
 
View attachment 4111

The vile headline above tells you all you need to know about Sarah Vine.

There are plenty of people who think that milking a Royal title, whilst simultaneously not wanting to be working Royals; asking for privacy and selling their story to the highest bidder, preaching values whilst not following them etc would suggest she was prescient, rather than prejudiced? Personally, how they choose to live their lives doesn't affect me at all.


And in respects of my original response, it was to the quote "and wife of wobbly turncoat, and anti-expert Michael Gove."

I have no problem with those who say it's to do with her opinions and her profession, but that quote doesn't say that.

To suggest that she should be singled out because of her husband and for what he chooses to do (after being elected to do it) is simply wrong and makes her a possession of her husband and I fundamentally disagree with that.
 
There are plenty of people who think that milking a Royal title, whilst simultaneously not wanting to be working Royals; asking for privacy and selling their story to the highest bidder, preaching values whilst not following them etc would suggest she was prescient, rather than prejudiced? Personally, how they choose to live their lives doesn't affect me at all.


And in respects of my original response, it was to the quote "and wife of wobbly turncoat, and anti-expert Michael Gove."

I have no problem with those who say it's to do with her opinions and her profession, but that quote doesn't say that.

To suggest that she should be singled out because of her husband and for what he chooses to do (after being elected to do it) is simply wrong and makes her a possession of her husband and I fundamentally disagree with that.
You have chosen to misunderstand me. As I said, it is the fact she is writing an article stating how bad Brexit has been for her. I dare say that there will be quite a number of people whose lives will be more adversely effected than hers.
 
Last edited:
You like someone who has used her extreme privilege as a journalist to write a piece that could be subtitled 'Do you know who I feel sorry for in all this, me?' It is her own husband who has been one of the main architects of Brexit and we are meant to feel sorry for her. She even managed to worm her way onto thought for today to explain why her husband isn't the spoon we all think he is.
Yawn
 
Back
Top