Team for tonight ?

M

Middxile

Well-known member
In no particular order or formation, I would expect to see : O’Donnell, Lyons, Pennington, Gabriel, Oakley-Booth, Carey, Dale, Coulson, Virtue, Lavery and Morgan. In that mix, Dale and Lavery up front. Critch will probably pull two or three of ‘em off after an hour or so.
 
Middxile said:
In no particular order or formation, I would expect to see : O’Donnell, Lyons, Pennington, Gabriel, Oakley-Booth, Carey, Dale, Coulson, Virtue, Lavery and Morgan. In that mix, Dale and Lavery up front. Critch will probably pull two or three of ‘em off after an hour or so.
Click to expand...
Bit short of centre backs. Have a look at the other thread on this subject.
 
If Lyons doesn’t get a start tonight I think we’ve already seen the last of him and he’ll be gone by Thursday night.
 
Middxile said:
In no particular order or formation, I would expect to see : O’Donnell, Lyons, Pennington, Gabriel, Oakley-Booth, Carey, Dale, Coulson, Virtue, Lavery and Morgan. In that mix, Dale and Lavery up front. Critch will probably pull two or three of ‘em off after an hour or so.
Click to expand...
Lucky lads😉
 
Middxile said:
In no particular order or formation, I would expect to see : O’Donnell, Lyons, Pennington, Gabriel, Oakley-Booth, Carey, Dale, Coulson, Virtue, Lavery and Morgan. In that mix, Dale and Lavery up front. Critch will probably pull two or three of ‘em off after an hour or so.
Click to expand...
Sorry to have to raise the point, and I know previously his judgement on the question of his substitutions has sometimes raised a few eyebrows, but, speaking frankly, I really don't think that can be used as any kind of justification for the questionable behaviour the poster is possibly predicting we may see from Critch as he oversees any late changes during the course of tonight's encounter with Notlob ... I mean, I'm as liberal-minded as they come, but I think there are certain common boundaries with which we should 'all' be expected to comply.
 
tarantula said:
Sorry to have to raise the point, and I know previously his judgement on the question of his substitutions has sometimes raised a few eyebrows, but, speaking frankly, I really don't think that can be used as any kind of justification for the questionable behaviour the poster is possibly predicting we may see from Critch as he oversees any late changes during the course of tonight's encounter with Notlob ... I mean, I'm as liberal-minded as they come, but I think there are certain common boundaries with which we should 'all' be expected to comply.
Click to expand...
Yet, it's all in the eye or mind of the beholder
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top