The FSA (and BST thru their submission) have called for a more stringent fit and proper owners test but haven't said a dickie bird on NU, where the main international human rights groups have called it into question.Names
Re Newcastle, to be honest with you I wouldn't know exactly what has been campaigned for but surely you are not suggesting that the FSA have been campaigning against foreign investment in clubs from states with questionable human rights issues/problems ?
What did the Newcastle Gay Supporters Association - if there is such a thing ? - have to say about things, is everything/everybody OK because they have got rid of Ashley ?
...moving on, not a big issue but I am not sure what you meant when you said on your last line about what I said about their approach to their own supporters ?
I'm assuming that you are talking about supporters groups and/or trusts but I don't know what it was that I said about their approach to their own supporters ?
That sits alongs the FSAs own inertia on the Qatar WC where gays are persecuted along with others,workers rights are negligible but where Kevin Miles ( FSA CEO) sits on the Kick it Out committee.
It seems that if a clique gets some momentum then it starts to make it up as it goes along, and the people its supposed to represent become insignificant- a bit like politics i suppose!
Money underpins this whether its the Mo Salas getting millions per season or the fans groups with windfalls and paid expenses, and the things that need addressing get buried in social media nonsense.
Does that answer your questions?