Alan Browne calls Preston fans an ‘absolute joke’ on Twitter

You may not believe it but I have a load of respect for your fans who stayed and supported 'pool even when the really bad times were there, but not those fans who just gave in and turned their back on the club and either did nothing or started to support another club.
What a plonker. He's a mushroom who doesn't even support Blackpool!!!
You are MILES off the mark with that post mate, NOBODY turned their back on Blackpool, those who boycotted were making a massive sacrifice, not just "doing nothing".
Your lack of knowledge on this topic is either a wind up or stupidity...I'm inclined to believe it's the latter
 
No I am not saying that at all, I am asking so I can understand why certain things happened. Why were there protests 30 years ago as I don't remember any?
Because we always knew Owen and his family were wrong 'uns. They always did the absolute minimum and treated fans like dirt. You'll find plenty of protest info from a tangerine graffiti'd Ford Sierra parked outside the old ground, to funeral marches down Bloomfield Road that go back to the early 90s. The success we achieved between 2007-2011 was largely due to other factors, mainly Belokon's money and 2 very good managers. The tipping point when protests became boycotts was the suing of fans. The NAPM stance was the only option we thought we had, you are entirely wrong saying we walked away from our club, we didn't, we fought like no other fans have for it. Whether that be outside the stadium or at the courts. That is why you now see and hear our fans singing louder than ever.
 
...at least Giro is interesting and has a laugh......you're just tedious
I think that’s probably stretching it a bit, even his own fans think Giro is a killjoy.

This new Nobber is bound to be struggling really as we’re back, bigger, brasher and better than ever and Nob End can’t compete…

They have nothing to offer at all:-

Shit Banter
Shit Team
Shit Manager
Shit Chairman
Shit Owner
Shit Fans
Shit Atmosphere
Shit Team Colours


The only things they have going for them are:-

They were founder members of the FL and played a prominent role (winning early league titles) in the formation of Professional League Football in the U.K.

Their Stadium has a decent capacity and is fully functional. Although I’m not sure they own it.

Their Club Captain thinks they are embarrassing and he’s absolutely right. I can’t envisage ever witnessing our fans booing Blackpool Players at Deepdale - And some of them have the audacity to accuse their captain of disloyalty - To his credit, he’s saying it as it is!
 
Since you are a top Tangerine fan and so well informed are you saying that you were boycotting games and protesting against the Oystens 20 years ago or even 15 years ago because your mate Big Bertha stated that you had 30 years of antics from OO? Also, why didn't you protest about OO owning and running your club when he was found guilty of rape of a minor?
Considering I was still in school round that time I don’t think it was my top priority....

Not sure what you dont get, no one really liked them, we were stuck with them, only once we won the lottery and carried on the same and also fans were sued was the real tipping point for the boycott.

Its really not hard to grasp.
 
Unpopular, but Norfolk makes a valid point. There was, as I recall, no large-scale boycott due to the rape conviction circa 1995-96. I kept going -- we were doing quite well at the time. I remember back then I didn't really trust the verdict, and justified it on that basis. But I was a ** idiot at the time! If the same happened in 2021, I'd have a tough moral choice to make.

Also, she was a model not a miner (too soon?).
 
As you know, every fan think their club is the best and I have a lot of respect for them apart from those who support such as Chelsea, Man Utd, Man City, Arsenal, Spurs, Liverpool etc, but have never been to see them play live and live miles and miles from their club's home ground. You may not believe it but I have a load of respect for your fans who stayed and supported 'pool even when the really bad times were there, but not those fans who just gave in and turned their back on the club and either did nothing or started to support another club.
Also have you attempted to answer the question below based off you and your fans incorrect nonsense.

"They only stopped going because they were relegated"

Why then did the crowds jump massively in league 1 once they had gone?

If it was just about lower league football this wouldn't have happened.

🙄

Didn't you see 15k+ pool fans descend on Bloomfield Road?

 
Last edited:
Unpopular, but Norfolk makes a valid point. There was, as I recall, no large-scale boycott due to the rape conviction circa 1995-96. I kept going -- we were doing quite well at the time. I remember back then I didn't really trust the verdict, and justified it on that basis. But I was a ** idiot at the time! If the same happened in 2021, I'd have a tough moral choice to make.

Also, she was a model not a miner (too soon?).
My understanding is that Owen Oyston was removed as chairman because of his conviction, his wife Vicki took over and then his son Karl after her. The bloke was removed as chairman, I don't get how Nobbers can label our fanbase as rapist sympathisers when he literally wasn't chairman anymore

There has always been an anti-Oyston sentiment in the fan base, my Dad never liked them so probably why I felt a bit more in tune to it as he'd always slag them off when I first stated going games with him in the 00s, I felt it was more just accepted that they were tight fisted bastards - it was only when it was revealed they'd been stealing from the club that the underlying dislike developed into full blown protest.

This image is from the 90s, I'd hardly say we've ever been a particularly "pro-Oyston" fan base - even when things were going well. I think it sums it up perfectly to say any achievements we had during their tenure fall more in the category of despite them, rather than because of them.
hate1.jpg
 
My understanding is that Owen Oyston was removed as chairman because of his conviction, his wife Vicki took over and then his son Karl after her. The bloke was removed as chairman, I don't get how Nobbers can label our fanbase as rapist sympathisers when he literally wasn't chairman anymore

There has always been an anti-Oyston sentiment in the fan base, my Dad never liked them so probably why I felt a bit more in tune to it as he'd always slag them off when I first stated going games with him in the 00s, I felt it was more just accepted that they were tight fisted bastards - it was only when it was revealed they'd been stealing from the club that the underlying dislike developed into full blown protest.

This image is from the 90s, I'd hardly say we've ever been a particularly "pro-Oyston" fan base - even when things were going well. I think it sums it up perfectly to say any achievements we had during their tenure fall more in the category of despite them, rather than because of them.
hate1.jpg
OO was still the owner though. I just don't remember it being as big of hot potato it probably would be in 2021.
 
No I cannot find anything about protests against the Oystens prior to your relegation from the Prem never mind 20 or 30 years ago so I guess you was telling a porkie pie and unless you can provide some links to prove otherwise and if you cannot I guess it would be you that is the numpty. So please do one now and show me some links that 'pool fans were protesting against the Oystens prior to your Prem relegation season or any relating to him being found guilty of being a rapist. Thanks
the finger.png
 
Because we always knew Owen and his family were wrong 'uns. They always did the absolute minimum and treated fans like dirt. You'll find plenty of protest info from a tangerine graffiti'd Ford Sierra parked outside the old ground, to funeral marches down Bloomfield Road that go back to the early 90s. The success we achieved between 2007-2011 was largely due to other factors, mainly Belokon's money and 2 very good managers. The tipping point when protests became boycotts was the suing of fans. The NAPM stance was the only option we thought we had, you are entirely wrong saying we walked away from our club, we didn't, we fought like no other fans have for it. Whether that be outside the stadium or at the courts. That is why you now see and hear our fans singing louder than ever.
Many thanks for your reasoned explanation. Given what you have stated I can understand the 'pool fans are right behind the club and sing lounder than ever 👍 Can I just as, were the funeral marches carried out on the occasions following 'pool being relegated? As I don't see that as being a protest, we even do the same thing as do Rovers I think
 
Many thanks for your reasoned explanation. Given what you have stated I can understand the 'pool fans are right behind the club and sing lounder than ever 👍 Can I just as, were the funeral marches carried out on the occasions following 'pool being relegated? As I don't see that as being a protest, we even do the same thing as do Rovers I think
No, not as I recall, it wasn't a scarf burial like your lot do after every relegation.
 
At least we only boo and don't try and get games abandoned, called off, etc both home and away. Given your lot did this then why should OO have "throw(n) money down the toilet on a football team who boo their own players and cant be arsed to turn up to home games."
At least OO got you lot to the top division for one season and you lot where singing his name only to turn on him once you were relegated.
As much as we can’t stand each other for supporting rival football teams I’m pretty sure you don’t believe that we ever chanted Owen oystons name pre promotion to the premiership, when we were in the premiership or after we got relegated from the premiership, we got lucky with Ollie and what happened after relegation was a massive downward spiral due to the 90 or so million that was pocketed by the family, this has probably been posted above or below my post but I really can’t be bothered checking, I know if you were in our situation you’d have done similar protests etc as would most fan bases who actually cared enough about the club they had supported all their lives, let’s face it to people who don’t get football it sounds stupid and irrational, but it’s not
 
No I cannot find anything about protests against the Oystens prior to your relegation from the Prem never mind 20 or 30 years ago so I guess you was telling a porkie pie and unless you can provide some links to prove otherwise and if you cannot I guess it would be you that is the numpty. So please do one now and show me some links that 'pool fans were protesting against the Oystens prior to your Prem relegation season or any relating to him being found guilty of being a rapist. Thanks
I started a petition against the Owner 1994 in the aftermath of Billy Ayre leaving, we had a demonstration outside the ground with about 300 fans present and a signed petition ,
The Evening Gazette had a front page spread so there was unrest then but unfortunately not in enough numbers .
Normally I would never respond to a WUM merchant but I have made an exception with you .
Good Bye,
 
Why should I go and what MB rules have I broke? Or is disagreeing with you and some others a rule breaker?
Evening Norfolk.

You should practice what you preach.

That bloody Lasher on Online is still banned.

You and your fellow Mods must still be feasting on sour grapes.
 
No I cannot find anything about protests against the Oystens prior to your relegation from the Prem never mind 20 or 30 years ago so I guess you was telling a porkie pie and unless you can provide some links to prove otherwise and if you cannot I guess it would be you that is the numpty. So please do one now and show me some links that 'pool fans were protesting against the Oystens prior to your Prem relegation season or any relating to him being found guilty of being a rapist. Thanks
Now you're just being purposely obtuse.

You were literally provided with evidence earlier in the thread, or can you not click a link?

9 January 1999. March and protest against the Oystons. Think that is more than 20 years ago. You can find details on the Internet😉

Plus loads more posts including the picture of the car.

Not that this has anything to do with the boycott, which again happened after it was found out what was happening with the prem money, lack of legacy and investment and also suing fans.

I notice you've not answered my point from earlier....

You lot like a bunch of idiots say stuff like....

"They only stopped going because they were relegated"

Why then did the crowds jump massively in league 1 once they had gone?

Seems strange doesn't it Sherlock, they stopped going because they were relegated but started going again in the same league they didn't want to go to before.....

🤔

You're making yourself look a fool.
 
There's at least 2 nobbers on this thread at least one has the honesty to post as one

FWIW's I'm 48 turning 49 and I remember being in a protest outside of BR late 80's with a brilliant rendition of Sack the Board, Sack the Board "we want Oyston Out" etc. It was outside the Players and Directors entrance (old days!)

To suggest there was an Oyston love in, is just patent nonsense.

NAPM was a brilliantly orchestrated campaign to affect change; with the help of VB we did.

Football fans up and down the country were delighted for us.

Absolutely everything else from NW and the undercover one, is just bitterness masquerading as opinion.
 
There's at least 2 nobbers on this thread at least one has the honesty to post as one

FWIW's I'm 48 turning 49 and I remember being in a protest outside of BR late 80's with a brilliant rendition of Sack the Board, Sack the Board "we want Oyston Out" etc. It was outside the Players and Directors entrance (old days!)

To suggest there was an Oyston love in, is just patent nonsense.

NAPM was a brilliantly orchestrated campaign to affect change; with the help of VB we did.

Football fans up and down the country were delighted for us.

Absolutely everything else from NW and the undercover one, is just bitterness masquerading as opinion.
Who's the other? Cba going back through....
 
Now you're just being purposely obtuse.

You were literally provided with evidence earlier in the thread, or can you not click a link?


Plus loads more posts including the picture of the car.

Not that this has anything to do with the boycott, which again happened after it was found out what was happening with the prem money, lack of legacy and investment and also suing fans.

I notice you've not answered my point from earlier....

You lot like a bunch of idiots say stuff like....

"They only stopped going because they were relegated"

Why then did the crowds jump massively in league 1 once they had gone?

Seems strange doesn't it Sherlock, they stopped going because they were relegated but started going again in the same league they didn't want to go to before.....

🤔

You're making yourself look a fool.
Just because one car was vandalised doesn't mean that there was a big protest does it, 2 or 3 youths could have done that.

So are you saying that some of those extra 'pool fans who turned up when you reached the Prem didn't stop going after you were relegated from the Prem?

I know that your attendance shot up greatly the game after the Oystens were thrown out but that soon started to drop again didn't it. Even though your attendances where higher than before they still dropped down quite a lot after that first game you had your club back.

Did your attendances drop once OO was found guilty and sent to prison or did they remain more or less the same?
 
Just because one car was vandalised doesn't mean that there was a big protest does it, 2 or 3 youths could have done that.

So are you saying that some of those extra 'pool fans who turned up when you reached the Prem didn't stop going after you were relegated from the Prem?

I know that your attendance shot up greatly the game after the Oystens were thrown out but that soon started to drop again didn't it. Even though your attendances where higher than before they still dropped down quite a lot after that first game you had your club back.

Did your attendances drop once OO was found guilty and sent to prison or did they remain more or less the same?
Keep clutching those straws.

Reasons for rising and falling gates over getting to and then falling from the Premier League is never going to be an issue for you.

And the car wasn't vandalised. It was painted up and parked outside the ground as part of the protest.
 
I started a petition against the Owner 1994 in the aftermath of Billy Ayre leaving, we had a demonstration outside the ground with about 300 fans present and a signed petition ,
The Evening Gazette had a front page spread so there was unrest then but unfortunately not in enough numbers .
Normally I would never respond to a WUM merchant but I have made an exception with you .
Good Bye,
Many thanks for your reply. I wasn't aware of your 1994 protest but as you state it didn't last long enough to do anything and it would appear that the vast majority of 'pool fans weren't that bothered, but at least you tried 👍

BTW why am I a WUM, I am either trying to understand things regarding your boycotts or responding to those who are not willing to answer my questions, unlike you, but just posts abuse? According to some pool fans 'it's only banter'
 
I remember being very anti Oyston around the turn of the millennium, but most(certainly on here) were still onboard with his 'plan' then and didn't rock the boat. Then when we got promoted to the Prem I must admit that I started to have doubts about my thoughts about them, thinking it might have been a touch of genius after all! 🙄😚. However, I felt the crossroads was coming once we got relegated, because I knew then that some decent money had to be invested into the club, from the £90m we got from promotion...and parachute payments. That never happened though, leading me to believe I'd been right all along about them... 😏
 
I remember being very anti Oyston around the turn of the millennium, but most(certainly on here) were still onboard with his 'plan' then and didn't rock the boat. Then when we got promoted to the Prem I must admit that I started to have doubts about my thoughts about them, thinking it might have been a touch of genius after all! 🙄😚. However, I felt the crossroads was coming once we got relegated, because I knew then that some decent money had to be invested into the club, from the £90m we got from promotion...and parachute payments. That never happened though, leading me to believe I'd been right all along about them... 😏
That has been my thinking Sats, that whilst some were anti Oyston once word got round that he was being tried for rape, but not many. The vast majority supported the Oystons especially when promoted to the Prem and sang his praises at that time only to turn on the family when they realised what he was doing to the club and the parachute payments however, reading the posts on this thread nearly 100% state they never liked the Oystons from day one and were involved in protests from the start 20-30 years back. I think some would like to think they had done this and will not admit that they did suport the family until it was too late and the Oyston's .
All the best.
 
That has been my thinking Sats, that whilst some were anti Oyston once word got round that he was being tried for rape, but not many. The vast majority supported the Oystons especially when promoted to the Prem and sang his praises at that time only to turn on the family when they realised what he was doing to the club and the parachute payments however, reading the posts on this thread nearly 100% state they never liked the Oystons from day one and were involved in protests from the start 20-30 years back. I think some would like to think they had done this and will not admit that they did suport the family until it was too late and the Oyston's .
All the best.
Fuck off bellend.
 
That has been my thinking Sats, that whilst some were anti Oyston once word got round that he was being tried for rape, but not many. The vast majority supported the Oystons especially when promoted to the Prem and sang his praises at that time only to turn on the family when they realised what he was doing to the club and the parachute payments however, reading the posts on this thread nearly 100% state they never liked the Oystons from day one and were involved in protests from the start 20-30 years back. I think some would like to think they had done this and will not admit that they did suport the family until it was too late and the Oyston's .
All the best.
It’s all fairly straightforward really….

Fans have been protesting on and off for years. It was never about ‘Rape’ or Oystons external interests, it was about football.

Many fans didn’t believe the rape allegations at the time (different era). Oyston had claimed to have been set up politically and in any case, the running of the Club was taken over by Karl his Son and Owen stepped away.

The fans were still in active protest in 2006 when Belekon came in as an investor. In fact he was brought in due to fans protesting about lack of investment…. (Nothing to do with rape).

Many of us had hoped that Belekons influence would lead to him taking more of an active role and increasing his stake, which is what appeared to be happening in the lead up to our promotion to the Prem…

It wasn’t really until after promotion to the Prem that Owen seemed to step back into the limelight and suddenly had the confidence to become more prominent…

Obviously the rest is history, with him extracting tens of millions from the Club, suing fans etc… and that was the final straw…

The ‘rape’ thing was really about parallels being drawn between the ‘rape’ of our club financially and his past misdemeanours (which had seen him essentially live in exile for 15 years or so as far as our fans were concerned)

Like most clubs I think our fanbase had periodically made efforts to oust the owners, but at the same time had adopted the attitude that they didn’t want to negatively affect or harm the club…. So protests were sporadic, limited and fans were split….. That all changed when Owen came back into the limelight and as I say, him suing fans was the final straw…. I think 90% of fans were willing to face life in the conference or lower if necessary just to get him out.
 
Just because one car was vandalised doesn't mean that there was a big protest does it, 2 or 3 youths could have done that.

So are you saying that some of those extra 'pool fans who turned up when you reached the Prem didn't stop going after you were relegated from the Prem?

I know that your attendance shot up greatly the game after the Oystens were thrown out but that soon started to drop again didn't it. Even though your attendances where higher than before they still dropped down quite a lot after that first game you had your club back.

Did your attendances drop once OO was found guilty and sent to prison or did they remain more or less the same?
What about the protest you've been linked with twice now either the Facebook link....

You never mention that.

Every club gets a glory hunter league bounce not sure what relevance that has.

You're on about the 15k who went to celebrate the oystons going, this included probably almost all exiles, all floating fans, hardcore plus extras.

It’s never going to carry on just like your game against us or Liverpool doesn't carry on as people make an effort for the special games.

The attendances announced during the boycott looked massaged anyway, only got to look at the pictures of the crowds to know the amount claimed to be there to save face, looked nowhere near there.

So crowds probably trebled or more in some cases.

As for when he was found guilty you'll have to ask someone else as I was a lot younger. Also why does it matter, you keep going off on weird tangents when you get told about why the boycott started and the tipping point.

In the lower leagues they weren't liked but we were a club with no money, so not spending could just about be accepted.

But once money came in and the chance of a lifetime was being squandered plus the suing of our own fans etc enough was enough.
 
It’s all fairly straightforward really….

Fans have been protesting on and off for years. It was never about ‘Rape’ or Oystons external interests, it was about football.

Many fans didn’t believe the rape allegations at the time (different era). Oyston had claimed to have been set up politically and in any case, the running of the Club was taken over by Karl his Son and Owen stepped away.

The fans were still in active protest in 2006 when Belekon came in as an investor. In fact he was brought in due to fans protesting about lack of investment…. (Nothing to do with rape).

Many of us had hoped that Belekons influence would lead to him taking more of an active role and increasing his stake, which is what appeared to be happening in the lead up to our promotion to the Prem…

It wasn’t really until after promotion to the Prem that Owen seemed to step back into the limelight and suddenly had the confidence to become more prominent…

Obviously the rest is history, with him extracting tens of millions from the Club, suing fans etc… and that was the final straw…

The ‘rape’ thing was really about parallels being drawn between the ‘rape’ of our club financially and his past misdemeanours (which had seen him essentially live in exile for 15 years or so as far as our fans were concerned)

Like most clubs I think our fanbase had periodically made efforts to oust the owners, but at the same time had adopted the attitude that they didn’t want to negatively affect or harm the club…. So protests were sporadic, limited and fans were split….. That all changed when Owen came back into the limelight and as I say, him suing fans was the final straw…. I think 90% of fans were willing to face life in the conference or lower if necessary just to get him out.
Many thanks for your explanation and it dies seem reasonable what the 'pool fans did regarding the boycott, etc given what you have all gone through. If others on here were as open to explaining the situation and the affects it had on both club and supporters I'm sure that you would get more support and praise you for your actions. However, as can be seen from other posts on this thread and the abuse I have received for daring to ask questions, if this has been the norm then I can also understand the remarks of other fans from elsewhere because all we have had to go with is what we saw on TV regarding the abandonment of games which affected the other teams fans who paid to watch a game, trying to vandalise the ground and threaten the owners of the time, etc and what we read in the media.
With having asked the questions and your reply along with We8's has helped me to understand things from your side a lot more and also have more sympathy. Many thanks 👍
 
You never mention that.

Every club gets a glory hunter league bounce not sure what relevance that has.

You're on about the 15k who went to celebrate the oystons going, this included probably almost all exiles, all floating fans, hardcore plus extras.

It’s never going to carry on just like your game against us or Liverpool doesn't carry on as people make an effort for the special games.

The attendances announced during the boycott looked massaged anyway, only got to look at the pictures of the crowds to know the amount claimed to be there to save face, looked nowhere near there.

So crowds probably trebled or more in some cases.

As for when he was found guilty you'll have to ask someone else as I was a lot younger. Also why does it matter, you keep going off on weird tangents when you get told about why the boycott started and the tipping point.

In the lower leagues they weren't liked but we were a club with no money, so not spending could just about be accepted.

But once money came in and the chance of a lifetime was being squandered plus the suing of our own fans etc enough was enough.
Many thanks for your explanation and I would refer you to me reply to another poster above in post #187 👍
 
Many thanks for your explanation and it dies seem reasonable what the 'pool fans did regarding the boycott, etc given what you have all gone through. If others on here were as open to explaining the situation and the affects it had on both club and supporters I'm sure that you would get more support and praise you for your actions. However, as can be seen from other posts on this thread and the abuse I have received for daring to ask questions, if this has been the norm then I can also understand the remarks of other fans from elsewhere because all we have had to go with is what we saw on TV regarding the abandonment of games which affected the other teams fans who paid to watch a game, trying to vandalise the ground and threaten the owners of the time, etc and what we read in the media.
With having asked the questions and your reply along with We8's has helped me to understand things from your side a lot more and also have more sympathy. Many thanks 👍

Sorry, that doesn't wash with me. Fans of clubs up and down the country know what happened to us. It's why our Supporters Trust is so highly respected and why we get so much goodwill now we are on the way back. We stand for principled resistance to the worst kind of ownership.

Your fans choose not to acknowledge any of that, even though you must know it. Why? Maybe because you know you could never do anything like it. Even now when you think that your time in the elite end of the League might be coming to an end you can't do more than bleat on PNE-Online.
 
F
Many thanks for your explanation and it dies seem reasonable what the 'pool fans did regarding the boycott, etc given what you have all gone through. If others on here were as open to explaining the situation and the affects it had on both club and supporters I'm sure that you would get more support and praise you for your actions. However, as can be seen from other posts on this thread and the abuse I have received for daring to ask questions, if this has been the norm then I can also understand the remarks of other fans from elsewhere because all we have had to go with is what we saw on TV regarding the abandonment of games which affected the other teams fans who paid to watch a game, trying to vandalise the ground and threaten the owners of the time, etc and what we read in the media.
With having asked the questions and your reply along with We8's has helped me to understand things from your side a lot more and also have more sympathy. Many thanks 👍
Foggys book 'How not to run a football club' (see related thread) will hopefully give you an insight into how bad things were under the Oystons.
 
Sorry, that doesn't wash with me. Fans of clubs up and down the country know what happened to us. It's why our Supporters Trust is so highly respected and why we get so much goodwill now we are on the way back. We stand for principled resistance to the worst kind of ownership.

Your fans choose not to acknowledge any of that, even though you must know it. Why? Maybe because you know you could never do anything like it. Even now when you think that your time in the elite end of the League might be coming to an end you can't do more than bleat on PNE-Online.
If my post doesn't wash with you, so what that is OK with me, I will not be upset and I knew when I posted it that there would be some who have ingrained views and swear black is white just as some of our fans will never change their views regardin your boycott, etc.
 
Whoooossshhhhhhhh...........🤣

You're obviously not used to mild sarcasm over on PKEOnline....
Then again, having read your forum, you're only used to depression and an unhealthy obsession with bowler hats.....
 
It’s all fairly straightforward really….

Fans have been protesting on and off for years. It was never about ‘Rape’ or Oystons external interests, it was about football.

Many fans didn’t believe the rape allegations at the time (different era). Oyston had claimed to have been set up politically and in any case, the running of the Club was taken over by Karl his Son and Owen stepped away.

The fans were still in active protest in 2006 when Belekon came in as an investor. In fact he was brought in due to fans protesting about lack of investment…. (Nothing to do with rape).

Many of us had hoped that Belekons influence would lead to him taking more of an active role and increasing his stake, which is what appeared to be happening in the lead up to our promotion to the Prem…

It wasn’t really until after promotion to the Prem that Owen seemed to step back into the limelight and suddenly had the confidence to become more prominent…

Obviously the rest is history, with him extracting tens of millions from the Club, suing fans etc… and that was the final straw…

The ‘rape’ thing was really about parallels being drawn between the ‘rape’ of our club financially and his past misdemeanours (which had seen him essentially live in exile for 15 years or so as far as our fans were concerned)

Like most clubs I think our fanbase had periodically made efforts to oust the owners, but at the same time had adopted the attitude that they didn’t want to negatively affect or harm the club…. So protests were sporadic, limited and fans were split….. That all changed when Owen came back into the limelight and as I say, him suing fans was the final straw…. I think 90% of fans were willing to face life in the conference or lower if necessary just to get him out.
In 2007 we were singing Championship with Latvian cash. Everyone knew that Valeri was behind our improvement and it wasn't because of the Oystons who had spent 20 years doing just enough.
 
Norfolk, you're being rather disingenuous.

Posting ban in September allegedly until October 23rd.

Whatever happened that day to make you and your fellow Mods change their minds?
No, sorry I thought you was allowed back on. I'll try and find out for you 👍
 
Norfolk, you're being rather disingenuous.

Posting ban in September allegedly until October 23rd.

Whatever happened that day to make you and your fellow Mods change their minds?
I put your case forward and you are allowed back on tomorrpw morning (although it was suggested "Maybe we could impose strict conditions on him like he has to post a pic of himself wearing a PNE shirt on his return otherwise he's still exiled" but I thought that that was a step too far for you😂 so it's OK you don't have to do that).
 
Back
Top