I don't think we need to wait until after the Hull game for our answer as to whether the board are sticking with him. After the Wigan game was an opportunity, and we didn't. There's your answer. We're sticking with him.
My hope rests with the appointment of the two from Coventry who I think found some quality players for them for prices we should be able to reach. There are half a dozen really poor teams in this league, and even a half decent January transfer window will give us a decent chance, even with MA at the helm.
Longer term, I don't think it would be wise to keep MA as he just isn't going to galvanise the club, or offer any words of positivity, motivation or ambition for our club. In short, he doesn't inspire. We often display frustration at being treated, or thought of, as little Blackpool, and yet we have continued to make decisions that only strengthen that perception of us.
Take the managerial appointments recently of our local rivals:
- PNE poached a manager currently at a club on the up with a very promising CV.
- Wigan appoint Kolo Toure, as a player a multi Premier League and FA cup winner. A massive risk in his first managerial job, but the key thing is it demonstrates ambition. You simply don't attract people like him if the remit is to just keep a club up every season.
- Burnley - Kompany - again multi Premier league winner. Obviously Burnley are currently on a different level financially, but it still shows they're looking upwards.
Then we have us. Appointing an out of work manager who lost to the man he replaced in a play off final, who has spent most of his career in the lower leagues, with his last managerial post being a 17th placed league one finish with Lincoln. There was absolutely nothing inspiring or ambitious about his appointment, and you wouldn't have found any of our rivals even considering him. That's the difference and the reason he was a really poor appointment.