Why? Winning majors doesn't necessarily mean you are the best of all time. He's mopping up now due to lack of competition. Nadal was the king of clay he wouldn't have won that if he was still fit, Fed the king of Wimbledon.
As with all sports it’s impossible to make comparisons because so many factors come into it, but in the entire Djokovic Federer Nadal era, Andy Murray has been their only rival and when they finally have all gone, who is there to take on the mantle for tennis.
Has been super unlucky to be around at the same time as the other three that dominated and with injuries. I’ve always thought he had the game to be world number one for longer than he was but not sure quite had the temperament to match.Just a word for Murray, with the injuries and plated hip joint he has, he’s phenomenal;
Surbiton Trophy 2023 results: Andy Murray beats Jurij Rodionov to claim grass-court title
Britain's Andy Murray claims his first grass-court singles title for seven years with victory over Jurij Rodionov in the Surbiton Trophy final.www.bbc.co.uk
Agree, he was just the barest fraction not as good as Fed, Nadal and Novo in various aspects of his game. They all had one part of their game better than Andy but he's been a fantastic player.Has been super unlucky to be around at the same time as the other three that dominated and with injuries. I’ve always thought he had the game to be world number one for longer than he was but not sure quite had the temperament to match.
Here’s hoping he has a decent Wimbledon
I wonder how well known he is outside of the real tennis aficionados. How many will tune in to specifically watch him the way they do for Federer Rafa or Djokovi. I suspect Krygios is better known for his outbursts
Perhaps not yet but he’s good to watch and will become a superstar in time I’m sure.