Jaffa_The_Hut
Well-known member
Come on indeed.C’mon Hartley & Foakes
This is a collapse on the scale we are always used to seeing from an England team.
Come on indeed.C’mon Hartley & Foakes
They haven't but I wouldn't want to put much money on India either.Talksport said Eng have 'plenty' already.
I doubt it.
Come on indeed.
This is a collapse on the scale we are always used to seeing from an England team.
Even Alistair Cook during the tea break said 200/220 would be enough.Talksport said Eng have 'plenty' already.
I doubt it.
Doesn't seem enough to me either. Only takes one knock of an 80 and the target is well within reach and I don't see Engs spinners being as dangerous.Even Alistair Cook during the tea break said 200/220 would be enough.
I must be watching another game.
140/8 this is just dreadful still only 174 in the lead.
As was the case against Scotland yesterdayA perfect example of grabbing defeat from the jaws of victory, Englan
It’s shake your head stuff. Top players regularly out for not a lotAll out for just 145 a lead of just 192 FFS.
Their No7 hits 90 yet our last 3 batsmen hit 1 run between the 3 of them or for the last 4 wickets 8 runs which is just pathetic.
And that’s the difference between these 2 sides I’m afraid.
Your kidding aren’t youThe wicket has totally gone. If they bowl okay England win this.
I thought exactly the same.Your kidding aren’t you
I'm not expecting n England win and that means the series is done, we don't seem capable of removing Jaiswal cheaply for starters and if india bat sensibly I can see them winning by six or seven wickets.Just hoping I don't wake up tomorrow and it's all over. All this bazbollix is OK for a laugh but history shows to dominate in tests you have to stick around. Eventually they will remember this and take the best of the attacking play with them too - I hope.
29 required 5 wickets in hand.Game on now boys. India need 60 with 5 wickets down.
lol. Reckon we could stand and deliver that Jaff29 required 5 wickets in hand.
I think me you Chunkylad could knock these off.
I think to suggest we have players not good enough is a little harsh, you'll no doubt see the same players hitting big scores once the English season begins in May.They had a wobble earlier on but these two have steadied the ship somthing our Batsmen couldn’t do yesterday and that is the difference between the two teams their No7 batsman Jurel can hit 90 in the fist innings and 39 not out in the second most of our top order batsmen could only dream of hitting those runs.
A disappointing series ending for England who would have thought defeat after scoring 353 in the first innings?
Shocking batting again in yesterdays collapse 7 wickets went for just 34 runs if this is Bazball and the future then heaven help us.
India win at a canter with a day and a half to spare.
So disappointing and it’s time the selectors got ruthless with some of these players as just not good enough anymore.
A little harsh?I think to suggest we have players not good enough is a little harsh, you'll no doubt see the same players hitting big scores once the English season begins in May.
The reality is England and many other sides have struggled to deal with spin on spin friendly wickets in India especially when you look at the skill levels of the likes of spinners Jadeja, Ashwin and Kuldeep, even our own rookie 20 year old Bashir took eight wickets in this Test.
No India are unbeaten at home since 2012 and have lost just 4 of 50 Tests they've played at home since 2012.
When you consider that record it gives you an idea on how tough the task was for England to go to India and win this series.