This is exactly it. Free speech has to work both ways whatever and whoever it is being spoken by, and whomever it is referring to.
Slavery wasn't an offence under criminal law either. It''s more complicated than strict legal definitions. And I disagree they weren't trying to cause offence.It doesn't matter what you think about the opinions of the protestors, that is not the point. Acting like a ** is not an offence in criminal law. I don't think that they were trying to cause distress either, they are entitled to voice an opinion and they are doing just that in a peaceful manner. And in some cases they are being arrested for it.
If we stand for anything as a country we stand for freedom of speech and expression. This action by the police is completely contrary to that.
Slavery wasn't an offence under criminal law either. It''s more complicated than strict legal definitions. And I disagree they weren't trying to cause offence.
We stand for lots of things in this country including freedom of speech but also decency and respect. All those - and many others - will carry different weights at different moments in time and will have differing consequences in different circumstances.
I just don't think this is the freedom of speech hill to die on.
Happened with DianaYou don't stand for free speech, actually you are happy for people to be arrested when exercising their rights peacefully, your post says as much. Free speech extends a lot further than just opinions that you agree with.
You can't stop people from saying things that you don't agree with at times that you don't like it. That is because we live in a free society where our freedoms of expression should be protected in law. In this case they are not being protected, in fact people are being arrested for exercising those freedoms. IMO There is a kind of mania about the queen's death that seems to have affected people's judgement.
Charging people for heckling. It’s just daft really.The bloke who heckled Prince Andrew has been charged also .
A few of us where I work asked if we could come in to work on the day of the funeral. Can't be done, complete shut down so probably not an option in most workplaces.I can see both viewpoints here.
Silently holding a placard shouldn't be an arrestable event.
Shouting abuse at a cortege at people who have lost their mother is different.
I do wonder if the protestors will refuse to take the public holiday entitlement?
There's more than one principle. There's a time for taking a strict legal approach and a time for not acting like a **.
Everybody referenced above was deliberately pushing the boundaries for no other reason than wanting to cause distress. None of opinions expressed were original or needed to be heard at that particular moment in time.
If these same people say the same things again in a couple of weeks in a different environment then I doubt the police will look twice at them.
And if they do, I'll be on the side of the twats.
I think on this one that the football club can act like a pub landlord and say we just don't want you here.Preston ban football fan for life for derogatory tweet about the royal family
A source told the Guardian that the tweet, since deleted, said the optimal way for the week to end would be for the royal family to all die on their way to the Queen’s funeralwww.theguardian.com
The PNE fan seems like quite a sick person if what is reported is true. However, I wonder if a ban such as this has any legal basis, I don't think he has done anything illegal.
How is holding up a placard saying Not my King loud dissent?I think on this one that the football club can act like a pub landlord and say we just don't want you here.
The Royal family aren't my thing, but mistakenly in my view a lot of people think they benefit the country, so this week is not the week for loud and public dissent out of respect for the majority view.
Respect also goes to the Queen for the job she did with relatively little choice, but from the 20th September there is no way that those that have been arrested this week should be prevented from making their views known in the none violent way that they did.
But the view from the preston fan who hoped they all die going to the funeral is unacceptable, I don't think decent people hope for others to die.
It isn't by any normal standards, that person shouldn't have had any involvement with the police.How is holding up a placard saying Not my King loud dissent?
Don't get me wrong, I think shouting out at a cortege is out of order, but silent protest doesn't break any laws.
Looking back, all the Oyston protests would now result in mass arrests.It isn't by any normal standards, that person shouldn't have had any involvement with the police.
I also read about a barrister in London who was about to write a fairly benign message on a card he was going to hold up and the police stepped in to threaten him with arrest before he even wrote it!
Feelings are running high this week, it might just be a case of the police trying to nip trouble in the bud but they can't be allowed to continue like this after the funeral.
Although according to some snowflakes on here the hard left republicans are out in force tonight so with that level of sensitivity in place the police will find it easy to say people are being distressed or harassed. Slightly worrying.
Possibly, the random element would be is the average police officer supportive of your protest or not. As most protests to some extent are anti establishment most protesters will be up against it. Oystons is a weird one because outside of themselves very few people like them!!Looking back, all the Oyston protests would now result in mass arrests.
Fair enough, we disagree. But I don't think you can have a debate about freedom of speech without considering the context. Even the self-styled bastion of free speech - the USA - has the proviso you can't shout 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre. Going to a funeral and abusing the deceased and the deceased's family is shouting 'Fire' imo.Simply don't agree. In a couple of weeks the moment will have passed. The thread is about freedom of speech not about when is the best time to exercise it.
Abuse, yes, we agree is a no no. Holding up a blank card but arrested for thinking about writing on it? Really?Fair enough, we disagree. But I don't think you can have a debate about freedom of speech without considering the context. Even the self-styled bastion of free speech - the USA - has the proviso you can't shout 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre. Going to a funeral and abusing the deceased and the deceased's family is shouting 'Fire' imo.
Charles will still be King in a couple of weeks and Andrew will still be a nonce so plenty of opportunity for all those who wish to protest.
does not break any laws but it is low life. Downright low life.How is holding up a placard saying Not my King loud dissent?
Don't get me wrong, I think shouting out at a cortege is out of order, but silent protest doesn't break any laws.
I thinks that is what will have happened, maybe taken to a police station, put in a cell and after a few hours driven home. But some and on here will make an issue over it. Would rather see people making issues about young men caught with knives, getting let off and free to go.In my opinion he should have been told to pipe down, removed from the area if he continued, and then just let go again.
Massive overeaction for spouting an opinion that most of us share and no threat made either
Its a step too far if you ask me.
It doesn't matter what you think about the opinions of the protestors, that is not the point. Acting like a ** is not an offence in criminal law. I don't think that they were trying to cause distress either, they are entitled to voice an opinion and they are doing just that in a peaceful manner. And in some cases they are being arrested for it.
If we stand for anything as a country we stand for freedom of speech and expression. This action by the police is completely contrary to that.
“rapist”?I can see the argument for removing someone who is seriously breaching the peace at what is quite clearly an 'event' of national mourning. One person shouting abuse at a rapist for 10 seconds as he passed does not meet what should be a very high bar for arresting that person. And certainly not whoever it was who was arrested for holding a sign peacefully.
It was a blank piece of paper.Agree re the piece of paper, however how far could someone go regards whats written on the paper ?
To be fair, PKE Thor had been overstepping the boundaries of indecency for years up Beacon Fell, and didn't receive a ban from North End. It's a shame for him, he probably still has to go, where as this fan has received a real blessing.Preston ban football fan for life for derogatory tweet about the royal family
A source told the Guardian that the tweet, since deleted, said the optimal way for the week to end would be for the royal family to all die on their way to the Queen’s funeralwww.theguardian.com
The PNE fan seems like quite a sick person if what is reported is true. However, I wonder if a ban such as this has any legal basis, I don't think he has done anything illegal.
Yes“rapist”?
5Harassment, alarm or distress.
(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)uses threatening [harassment, alarm or distress or disorderly behaviour, or
(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening [F1or abusive],
within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.
so jimmy Armfield's funeral procession is travelling along the road watched by thousands of pool fans and a few Knob enders start shouting out at his son following the coffin what do you think would happen.
they would be arrested to stop public disorder
Who?
So this only applies to the one in Edinburgh. None of the others meet this threshold. And with regards to that particular case, there is clearly more of a public interest defence for protesting a royal family, and in particular the protection of a man who raped a teenager, than a universally beloved footballer. I doubt a protester at such an occasion would have a public interest defense.
5Harassment, alarm or distress.
(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)uses threatening [harassment, alarm or distress or disorderly behaviour, or
(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening [F1or abusive],
within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.
so jimmy Armfield's funeral procession is travelling along the road watched by thousands of pool fans and a few Knob enders start shouting out at his son following the coffin what do you think would happen.
they would be arrested to stop public disorder
Prince Andrew...Who?
It really depends....So this only applies to the one in Edinburgh. None of the others meet this threshold. And with regards to that particular case, there is clearly more of a public interest defence for protesting a royal family, and in particular the protection of a man who raped a teenager, than a universally beloved footballer. I doubt a protester at such an occasion would have a public interest defense.
Even so, and as a reply to BFC3 too, you can remove these people without charging them. I'm fine with the Prince Andrew protester being removed, that seems sensible to me. But to charge them is a disgrace.
You can arrest him and hold him for 24 hours and release without chargeIt really depends....
In the case of the bloke in Edinburgh, he seemed intent on continuing to shout abuse (despite being removed from the situation) so I think it's reasonable to arrest him, to prevent a further breach of the peace, public order issue.
There's some information HERE which seems fairly balanced about how things work.
Being arrested for simply holding a banner, seems to be OTT to me, but it's hard to comment without understanding the full circumstances. Ideally the Police should facilitate the process and provide some protection to the Protestors.
Wow... I knew he had settled a sexual assault claim OOC but didn’t know he was guilty of rape...Prince Andrew...
why is the last paragraph not comparable 1 a funeral procession 2 a few people with different views to the majority.How does displaying a sign that says 'Not my King' fit in with the terms of clause B? It is not threatening or abusive IMO.
The guy who reportedly shouted 'sick old man' to Prince Andrew is a debatable case; harassment : possible, alarm : no, distress : possible, disorderly behaviour : possible given the context. That happened in Scotland anyway so the law he was arrested under is probably different there. In any case, it's a low bar if he is arrested and charged for doing something so minor, a quiet word and being moved on would be more appropriate IMO.
Your last paragraph imagines a situation which is really not comparable with either of the above real situations.
public interest would come into it as it could cause public disorder at the hypothetical funeral when the majority turn on the minoritySo this only applies to the one in Edinburgh. None of the others meet this threshold. And with regards to that particular case, there is clearly more of a public interest defence for protesting a royal family, and in particular the protection of a man who raped a teenager, than a universally beloved footballer. I doubt a protester at such an occasion would have a public interest defense.
Even so, and as a reply to BFC3 too, you can remove these people without charging them. I'm fine with the Prince Andrew protester being removed, that seems sensible to me. But to charge them is a disgrace.
YepWow... I knew he had settled a sexual assault claim OOC but didn’t know he was guilty of rape...
I've no idea, but that makes sense, based on the limited offence which appears to have been committed.You can arrest him and hold him for 24 hours and release without charge
Genuinely didn’t know. How long a sentence did he serve... I’ve completely missed this
How about we bring this unoriginal tedium to an end and you realise that when internet commenters say things they do not do so with the full authority of the the UK criminal justice system. Avftt is not a court room, if you hadn't noticed.Genuinely didn’t know. How long a sentence did he serve... I’ve completely missed this
Utter paranoid bollocks.Oh goody hard left Republicans out in force again defending the indefensible.
Yet another with a condescending attitudeHow about we bring this unoriginal tedium to an end and you realise that when internet commenters say things they do not do so with the full authority of the the UK criminal justice system. Avftt is not a court room, if you hadn't noticed.
Funny thing is, Prince Andrew is legally not able to claim he didn't rape his victim as per the terms of the £12m settlement he voluntarily accepted in order to not face charges.
I still don't get the logic of why they would reward him with a lifetime ban watching PNE when he did such wrong.Preston ban football fan for life for derogatory tweet about the royal family
A source told the Guardian that the tweet, since deleted, said the optimal way for the week to end would be for the royal family to all die on their way to the Queen’s funeralwww.theguardian.com
The PNE fan seems like quite a sick person if what is reported is true. However, I wonder if a ban such as this has any legal basis, I don't think he has done anything illegal.
It"s wrong Lala.Charging people for heckling. It’s just daft really.
What if I held up a card which said ‘dear king, why did you take a huge bag of cash from a Saudi Arabian Prince? What were you offering in return? If a UK business man or any other official had done that they’d have been arrested. Why weren’t you? Surely it was piss poor judgement and smacks of corruption and is borderline criminal?’
1. Would I be arrested for that?
2. Is there a piece of card big enough to write that all on or would I have to do a sequence of cards like in Love Actually?
What if I held up a card which said ‘dear king, why did you take a huge bag of cash from a Saudi Arabian Prince? What were you offering in return? If a UK business man or any other official had done that they’d have been arrested. Why weren’t you? Surely it was piss poor judgement and smacks of corruption and is borderline criminal?’
1. Would I be arrested for that?
2. Is there a piece of card big enough to write that all on or would I have to do a sequence of cards like in Love Actually?
It’s this isn’t it.What if I held up a card which said ‘dear king, why did you take a huge bag of cash from a Saudi Arabian Prince? What were you offering in return? If a UK business man or any other official had done that they’d have been arrested. Why weren’t you? Surely it was piss poor judgement and smacks of corruption and is borderline criminal?’
1. Would I be arrested for that?
2. Is there a piece of card big enough to write that all on or would I have to do a sequence of cards like in Love Actually?
Because it's easier?It’s this isn’t it.
I stay as indifferent regarding the monarchy as possible, But, giving credit where it’s due, such as the Queens service to the nation during her reign.
But, why does that mean we have to turn a blind eye to the shades of corruption and lack of accountability for other instances relating to monarchy led behaviour ?