incredible_edibles
Well-known member
Certainly put a shift in (looked knackered at the end) and caused problems in the Hull back four. Great asset to the squad but I now wish he'd try Lavery/Yates again.
me too, i thought he mixed it up well and created space by occupying their central defendersI thought he did well last night.
Sorry not for me
Last night couldn’t trap a bus
Looked slow and laboured
Part of His game is to hold the ball to allow midfielders to push up and to overlap just kept giving the ball away
League one for me
Need a replacement in January
Yes I was there paid my money and have my own opinionWere you there?
I think he did well. He's a pest, not as quick as Jerry obv, but certainly not slow and laboured. Holds it up, good in the air, joined up well with midfield wen he could. Still third choice for me, but a decent third choice who will get better as he gets fitter.
Watching on TV, I was surprised how mobile he was last night.Were you there?
I think he did well. He's a pest, not as quick as Jerry obv, but certainly not slow and laboured. Holds it up, good in the air, joined up well with midfield wen he could. Still third choice for me, but a decent third choice who will get better as he gets fitter.
As a striker he will give us how many goals this season I say no more than 3Yes I was there paid my money and have my own opinion
Hold it up are you kidding, every touch he gets tackled as his first touch is terrible
Not good enough fact league one player
Slow, poor touch, etc
Need a replacement in Jan
Not writing players offLavery is clearly first choice for now at least and I thought we were better with Big Gaz (who apart from anything else had a vital hand in our goal) than with Jerry. That's not all down to Jerry though, we'd dropped off considerably by the time he was introduced. We'll need them all this season and maybe (hopefully) Ellis Simms as well, so how about we stop writing players off just yet?
There's definitely a tendency on this board and among footy fans in general to look at a big battering ram type of striker and wish he was faster. Murphs and Gnanduillet had their critics. So did Ben Burgess, though he was probably more deserving. Even so, there were times we looked a better side with him in it.He’s a prescence, he is good with his head and his feet, and he can also score goals. What’s not to like? He creates the space for your Yates and your Laverys by occupying defenders and also getting free kicks around the penalty area that a deadball specialist could make something of.
I think some fans just can’t get past him being a bit of a bad boy and getting paid large wages or having been a multi million pound player. They like their players small, tricky and modest in reputation transfer fees and wages! Other players coming back from injury get time from fans but straightaway a large number of our fans are on his back from the off.
Critchley has shown a massive reluctance to allow players back in the squad until their injury is well on its way to recovery yet Madine is crucified for being a sick note. If he was playing the manager then the manager wouldn’t be playing him end of!
Match fit he wasn’t 100%I wonder how we will get him match fit ? I'm sure the Manager who is a highly qualified coach will ponder on that one !
You said “not good enough fact” and “league one player”… then “not writing players off”. I think that is writing players off a little bit. Especially as he’s had what, 80-90 minutes with zero pre-season so far?Not writing players off
Just simply saying to be a mid table championship team we need more than a big lump
Madine has had to many injuries and it is now taking its toll
and we need better not wrong to say it
Ok Respect your opinionYou said “not good enough fact” and “league one player”… then “not writing players off”. I think that is writing players off a little bit. Especially as he’s had what, 80-90 minutes with zero pre-season so far?
Only a couple of years ago he was at Sheff Utd and their fans were unequivocal in the opinion that he played a big part in their promotion to the premier league, despite scoring only 3 goals.
I think he has a role to play and I think if he can stay fit he’ll only get better and better. I’m not saying I’d start him every week as I’m a big Yates fan and want to see him prove his doubters wrong too but I’ve no problem with him in the squad.
Bowler’s delivery is often poor. Now Feeney, he could cross a ball. Bowler has to improve his end product.If you played him with Bowler on the left crossing instead of cutting in to use his natural peg I would start him in a 4-3-3 every game.
He is wrong-footed on the right and until we see him running and crossing/passing on his strongest foot it's unfair to judge him.Bowler’s delivery is often poor. Now Feeney, he could cross a ball. Bowler has to improve his end product.
Yep fair enough, its only my opinion, not a fact. My answer is that I think we need to wait and see; players aren't machines, pre-season is done for a reason and players need it in order to get up to speed. I thought he did ok last night, not amazing, but ok. If he can stay fit, I don't see why he can't be an excellent championship target man. He's strong and an intelligent footballer. For a big player I think he's got excellent touch and linked up with Yates very well before his injury last season so could potentially bring the best out of Lavery or Yates (or both). I'd also have Simms at blackpool in a heartbeat too dont get me wrong, but I've no idea if that's likely or not.Ok Respect your opinion
but can you honestly say he is that player what played for Sheffield United
All I am saying we need better to stay in the championship
When he cuts in / back on his left foot the end product is the same. At the point of connection he doesn’t appear in total control of himself, because of the speed he’s going at.He is wrong-footed on the right and until we see him running and crossing/passing on his strongest foot it's unfair to judge him.
Murphy and Gnanduillet scored goals regularly.There's definitely a tendency on this board and among footy fans in general to look at a big battering ram type of striker and wish he was faster. Murphs and Gnanduillet had their critics. So did Ben Burgess, though he was probably more deserving. Even so, there were times we looked a better side with him in it.
It's a type that some people just don't seem to "get", which is fair enough. I prefer to look at what they can offer rather than what they can't.
fan of both but neither of them played at the level Madine has.Murphy and Gnanduillet scored goals regularly.
Of course, but we need a physical player up front who can score goals at whatever level we are at. Murphy, Gnanduillet and Burgess all much more mobile than Madine too.fan of both but neither of them played at the level Madine has.
Are you sure?!!Of course, but we need a physical player up front who can score goals at whatever level we are at. Murphy, Gnanduillet and Burgess all much more mobile than Madine too.