Well I know about Dan’s/sorry Martin’s/sorry Dan’s extra curricular activities.What an obnoxious pair of scumbags.
... and on GB News.
and some on here extol the merits of that so called TV Channel.
Will anyone come on here and defend them? Come on lets be aving you.
Isn’t this the website that gives a voice to a number of Tory MPs?
If so it’s no surprise the country is in such a mess.
Not forgetting the Nation’s favourite cuddly unfunny “comedian” Jim (vile) Davidson.Yep, and I suspect they are probably breaking an Ofcom code, and it certainly adds in part to the country`s malaise.
GB News is an outrage factory that pays lip service to news, but its really agenda is to propagate division and then monetise it like the US models.
Rabid conspiracy theorists (Neil Oliver) rub shoulders with discredited racists (David Starkey) and pseudo-religious weirdos (Calvin Robinson).
The channel is full of bloviating dingbats, some are faux ideologues (like Fox), and some are just plain nasty and vindictive chancers (like Wootton).
Panders to the seriously hard of thinking...
They just move online these days, where they can stoke up even more hatred and division. Already the “they’re trying to cancel me” line is being used at least by Fox, and apparently Ava Evans is receiving threats.Hopefully this will be the end of Wootton media wise, as his other major or misdemeanours seem to be taking a while to address.
Well Fox has said GB News et al were well aware he was going to say those things because they had done a pro recording run. Maybe they’ll suspend themselves. (We can but hope)GB News suspends Wootton after Fox comments - BBC News
Dan Wootton and Laurence Fox have been suspended over insults against Ava Evans on Wootton's show.www.bbc.co.uk
It’ll be this then.
Why would anyone expect better from this duo?
Edit to add: Although i suspect this is GB News trying to distance itself from Dan/Martin before the inevitable announcement.
Disgusting behaviour.They just move online these days, where they can stoke up even more hatred and division. Already the “they’re trying to cancel me” line is being used at least by Fox, and apparently Ava Evans is receiving threats.
I’ve never watched it to be fair. Not really my thing at all.What an incredibly crass thing to say (and allow to say without challenge).
I wonder what on earth goes on in people's heads sometimes. Not finding her attractive is fair enough - but to use that to denigrate her - absolute misogynistic crap.
I wouldn't tarnish the entire news channel based on these two though - we'd end up with nothing to watch if we did that as there's plenty broadcasters and reporters who have less than pure records and it's not how we should operate in a democracy.
FWIW I only watched it on its launch night and found it impossible to take seriously so I haven't watched it since.
I find that most broadcasters don't say such things live on air...what they do off air is completely separate.What an incredibly crass thing to say (and allow to say without challenge).
I wonder what on earth goes on in people's heads sometimes. Not finding her attractive is fair enough - but to use that to denigrate her - absolute misogynistic crap.
I wouldn't tarnish the entire news channel based on these two though - we'd end up with nothing to watch if we did that as there's plenty broadcasters and reporters who have less than pure records and it's not how we should operate in a democracy.
FWIW I only watched it on its launch night and found it impossible to take seriously so I haven't watched it since.
Terrible pile of divisive right wing propaganda and an embarrassment. Love the term bloviating dingbatsYep, and I suspect they are probably breaking an Ofcom code, and it certainly adds in part to the country`s malaise.
GB News is an outrage factory that pays lip service to news, but its real agenda is to propagate division and then monetise it like the US models.
Rabid conspiracy theorist (Neil Oliver) rubs shoulders with discredited racist (David Starkey) and pseudo-religious weirdo (Calvin Robinson).
The channel is full of bloviating dingbats, some are faux ideologues (like Fox), and some are just plain nasty and vindictive chancers (like Wootton).
Panders to the seriously hard of thinking...
What’s a typical lefty feminist by definition then ?From what I've seen it seemed inappropriate, he should have just attacked her argument, rather than it descend into a pub like conversation.
Having seen her arguments on Piers Morgan, some of them are bonkers.
She apparently downplayed male suicide but it could have been called out without being personal.
Seen tweets where she's using somewhat similar language, so seems a bit hypocritical.
View attachment 16678
Shes a typical lefty feminist whos arguments alone should be easy enough to dismantle, I did find this funny though...
She's probably a good example.What’s a typical lefty feminist by definition then ?
That’s an example, not a definition ?She's probably a good example.
Absolute bullshit.Someone who is to the left of Jjpool which will be probably about 99% of women
Well what is your definition of a typical, lefty feminist then?Absolute bullshit.
I showed clear examples in the post I made initially.That’s an example, not a definition ?
She lables herself a feminist you nutter.Well what is your definition of a typical, lefty feminist then?
You were very quick to label her, what actually did you mean?
...and the 'lefty' bit, how are you arriving at the conclusion that she supports left wing principles?I showed clear examples in the post I made initially.
She has toxic attitudes towards men, as shown in the video and the fact she downplayed male suicide, she happy to conflate teenagers learning about life with sexual assault, she likes 'the terror' that their life might be destroyed for misreading the signs maybe.
If youve watched her before, she seems to want all the equality but none of the responsibility.
She used similar language in tweets to what Fox used.
Ok I'm sorry If I have offended you, I have deleted the offending message, it wasn't intended as an attack on you personally, more of a joke.She lables herself a feminist you nutter.
You were quick to label me, go on, tell me what sort of person I am?
Because I've watched many programmes with her on and... she's always on the left maybe? You may as well say how is GB news to the right. It's not stating anything amazing to state what I said....and the 'lefty' bit, how are you arriving at the conclusion that she supports left wing principles?
Do all lefty feminist have toxic attitudes to men then by your definition ?I showed clear examples in the post I made initially.
She has toxic attitudes towards men, as shown in the video and the fact she downplayed male suicide, she happy to conflate teenagers learning about life with sexual assault, she likes 'the terror' that their life might be destroyed for misreading the signs maybe.
If youve watched her before, she seems to want all the equality but none of the responsibility.
She used similar language in tweets to what Fox used.
Well people seem so quick to label back themselves, based off nothing. I've actually watched and listened to tons she's said. She is definitely both things, nothing controversial about that.Ok I'm sorry If I have offended you, I have deleted the offending message, it wasn't intended as an attack on you personally, more of a joke.
I was just slightly concerned that in your original post you were straying into victim blaming territory, as if she invited Fox's attack and it was in some way justified because of comments she had made previously. I didn't like that.
You were quick to label her as left wing but don't like being called right wing yourself.
Anyway I'm out of this for now.
The people I've seen on progrmmes like that seem to have attitudes that are towards that way. Piers is often the voice of reason, which is funny.Do all lefty feminist have toxic attitudes to men then by your definition ?
I‘ve seen her on Piers Morgan. I thought she was sharp as tack, backed up her sh*t and took no prisoners. Some may say a threat to certain others.
Confess I had to look up bloviating, good wordThe channel is full of bloviating dingbats,
I was wondering why you thought she was a ‘typical’ lefty feminist. You obviously have a hard wired view of such to describe her as typical.The people I've seen on progrmmes like that seem to have attitudes that are towards that way. Piers is often the voice of reason, which is funny.
Anyway you seem determined to go off about what she refers to herself as.
I notice you completely ignored the crass language she used.
She should just have been called out for the things she says, rather than personal, not a lot more to say than that.
It says they fall far below the standards we should expect of them.I find that most broadcasters don't say such things live on air...what they do off air is completely separate.
What does it say about the channel that they employ such scum who think its OK to say things like that on air, and discuss it prior to the broadcast?
How did Neil Oliver (archaeologist and presenter of BBC TV series “Coast”) become a dingbat-crazy conspiracy theorist now ostracised from mainstream TV ?Yep, and I suspect they are probably breaking an Ofcom code, and it certainly adds in part to the country`s malaise.
GB News is an outrage factory that pays lip service to news, but its real agenda is to propagate division and then monetise it like the US models.
Rabid conspiracy theorist (Neil Oliver) rubs shoulders with discredited racist (David Starkey) and pseudo-religious weirdo (Calvin Robinson).
The channel is full of bloviating dingbats, some are faux ideologues (like Fox), and some are just plain nasty and vindictive chancers (like Wootton).
Panders to the seriously hard of thinking...
No, you've watched her on TV and made assumptions about her being left wing. I want you to tell me about any political views she has that brought you to that conclusion.Because I've watched many programmes with her on and... she's always on the left maybe? You may as well say how is GB news to the right. It's not stating anything amazing to state what I said.
She's on the left and a self confessed feminist. A lot of her views are typical of what you'd expect to hear and do hear. I actually said a few examples in my post.I was wondering why you thought she was a ‘typical’ lefty feminist. You obviously have a hard wired view of such to describe her as typical.
A toxic view of men is all you came up with really.
I think to be politically left leaning and to hold some feminist views is a lot more than that, and not even that, by definition.
Yeah alright....No, you've watched her on TV and made assumptions about her being left wing. I want you to tell me about any political views she has that brought you to that conclusion.
I don't think I've said anything about Wootten. I Don't know him.Yeah alright....
Could say the same with you about Wooten, your making assumptions about him, he's actually not on the right Use your brain.
It's an example, it's pretty obvious where some sit politically.I don't think I've said anything about Wootten. I Don't know him.
Oh dear. I’m sorry to hear that.Wootton sacked from Mail Online. It’s a start.
Are you serious?? In what god forsaken country in the year 2023 is that a bad thing associated with the left?a self confessed feminist.
Totally unacceptable, it’s ‘you’re making assumptions about him’ tch.Yeah alright....
Could say the same with you about Wooten, your making assumptions about him, he's actually not on the right Use your brain.
I think this has given the Mail a nice ‘get out clause’ to be honest.Oh dear. I’m sorry to hear that.
I wonder whether GB News knew in advance about the Mail decision? And decided it’d be an opportune moment to get rid as well?
To use a line favoured by right wing commentators - “I don’t know. Just asking the question”.
People said why label her that, I pointed out she labeled herself it.Are you serious?? In what god forsaken country in the year 2023 is that a bad thing associated with the left?
Oh wow 1 mistake whilst in a rush.Totally unacceptable, it’s ‘you’re making assumptions about him’ tch.