The trouble is that people really don't grasp the concept....
The fans are talking in terms of how much it might or might not cost, by drawing comparisons that relate to the purchases made after the deadline.... They're missing the point.. Though in reality the whole thing at Blackburn has been a complete cock up in any case, which shows the issues that you get with a poorly timed cut off to start with, combined with a complete lack of respect for the deadline.... That's the sort of shit show that develops...
The deadline itself has more to do with influencing purchasing patterns and the timing of them in order to ensure that they fit with the Clubs spending and cashflow requirements, as opposed to being about maximising the revenue on sales after the deadline.
For me... A better question to raise in our case (assuming that it is felt that the numbers com mitting pre-deadline are too low) is not whether the actual date of the deadline was wrong (because compared to other Clubs we've given fans longer than many), but rather whether the incentive to buy before the deadline was big enough.... And that might actually suggest that it might actually be better to reduce the early bird offer, but probably more sensible, to increase the post deadline price. Taking the Blackburn example... It seems to me that the lower price is barely an incentive at all (£399 vs £429)... ?? Is that right? I mean why would you bother buying early?
Looks like Blackburn messed it up in another way too reading that thread. They aren't a fanbase in sync with their owners so we can't compare everything.
But as for the early bird, there's more than one way to do things, with some plusses and minuses for each way.
When you stop the early bird you are often ending momentum, momentum that helps attract new people to the club and casuals. But also some might not care if there's a small rise. But equally if you nearly had enough then it ended just before you could afford it, you might not buy. People are funny, some will not pay more for the same thing. Yes they've 'had their chance' but when dealing with more casual fans they aren't as switched on to everything as we are.
You do need a deadline, as that focuses minds.
But I do wonder if there's another way, like a deadline to keep you seats, plus you get priority tickets like away games, maybe something more too. But then keep the prices the same after that deadline and keep the momentum going. Helps people afford it more, you hope the extra people who buy wipe out or even exceed any slight losses due to the price not rising.
That guy is right in a way, the money involved for a club is tiny and it then upsets the rhythm of sales.
I'm not sure if increasing it after will help, you might get the small number who usually buy after the deadline buying before now, but equally you'll get less sales after the deadline. Whereas keeping it the same and keeping positive momentum going you'll probably make a similar amount and the hope is get a few more in, with it being more affordableto more too. The higher price would also probably go down like a lead balloon.
I do think the timing of the early bird is also important, I think next season with the new website now in place we'll go earlier. Also it'd be helpful to definitely include 2 paydays and give a little time after the last one to purchase. These little helpful things add up, helping a small number here and there and increasing the overall number.
As for thier price increase it's not miles away from ours, yet you do find sales drop off after the deadline passes.
I don’t know the exact answer without all the data, but in some respect it comes down to what you believe will work, will help people and taking a small gamble. The differences in amounts made is so minimal for me I'd always prioritise getting more in. Plus use more inventive ways to do so.