fcblackpool
Well-known member
Don't forget his 2 minutes of acting career appearing on Crown Court back in the 80's.Must be some kind of record. First known court appearance 1955 and still appearing 2023. Not many have done that.
Oyston in court again
- Thread starter RambleFan
- Start date
Lost Seasider
Well-known member
So perhaps health and safety, maybe environmental or something like that.
tangerine.com
Well-known member
Looks are deceiving
Apparently the penthouse is now a home for discharged seamen.
Captain Sensible
Well-known member
Heāll be blowing nothing more than dust by now given his history.
todayistheday
Well-known member
Are the owners still trying to get him/them out.
Theoneandonly
Well-known member
What a crazy waste of time and money as itās not going away in its own.
Brett&Murphs.
Well-known member
Why would a multimillionaire not pay his council tax and rather go to court to try argue it? 89 year old. ** weird weird family.
GrahamwantshisOates
Well-known member
Just watch the surge of ST on 3rd August even though they will pay more. Some folk hate to part with money!
tangerine_neil
Well-known member
Because heās a cheap bāstard and heās breezed through life not paying for stuff.
Satriale's Pork Store
Well-known member
He has nearly as many holidays as that other well known solicitor!rare holiday ā¦. I thought you had retired
Southend tangerine
Well-known member
Thereās two ways to be rich Either earn lots or spend little
If you can do both then youāre really laughing
Lost Seasider
Well-known member
Presumably he's disputing the liability, claiming it rests elsewhere, no doubt.
Isn't this a criminal case though?
Yes, hence the adjournment.
I wondered if it might help with the eviction process? You would hope so. Best check the eaves for Morticia though.....
I hope so too, but I think it's Heidi who still resides there. She turned up towards the end of the hearing to speak with their legals.
Mark_GT
Well-known member
Is old Catweazle placing the liability on Heidi then? That would be about his level the old scroat.
seasideone
Well-known member
No - on the current owners - as the previous owners agreed that all bills and costs would be met by whoever owned it.
Apparently.
The mind boggles
Mark_GT
Well-known member
Simon will be delightedNo - on the current owners - as the previous owners agreed that all bills and costs would be met by whoever owned it.
Apparently.
The mind boggles
Let's hope he shows him the error of hs ways. Surely the bill in cases such as these would always be the liability of the tenant?
Theoneandonly
Well-known member
Who is Heidi?
His daughter that many suspect isn't
Opinionhated
Well-known member
Who knows he might end up inside keep Pilley company.
tangerine_neil
Well-known member
Heidi and Seek Champion 2023
Tangerine Tractor
Well-known member
Took 30 seconds to find the legal position. This is on nearly all councils websites in some form.
Matesrates
Well-known member
WowNo - on the current owners - as the previous owners agreed that all bills and costs would be met by whoever owned it.
Apparently.
The mind boggles
Love BFCš
Well-known member
Im sure it was 5 year lease so heād be out in February anyway. Could be wrong tho
I thought it was much longer than that
Love BFCš
Well-known member
I seem to remember a lease being signed just before the court took the club from under their smelly feet. Summat telling me it was 5 years though in the back of my mind
Would be fab if anybody on here could go back somewhere to check maybe tangerine knights or someone from BST
It must be longer because the club are still actively trying to get him out, wouldn't bother if it was due to run out soon anyway
The follow up that John le Carre never quite got round to.....
Matesrates
Well-known member
I would guess itās in a company name, so it wouldnāt matter if he died, Morticia would still be there
Denwis still have the office space so I presume it's the same lease
Tangerine Tractor
Well-known member
The point is that whatever agreement is made between the owner and tenant, the person living in the property is legally liable for the council tax. So the council are correct in demanding it from Oyston. If he thinks that the owner should be paying, then that's a civil matter between the two parties.
todayistheday
Well-known member
Maybe Simon will allow him to buy the 'freehold', earn a bit of coin.
You missed out the 3rd option.
'Cheat and lie'.
Judge Jepson told the court it was ānot his jobā to get involved in ālandlord / tenant issues or who pays the billsā.
āMr Oyston agreed he is the tenant and bears liability,ā he told the court.
The judge heard that legal proceedings are under way to remove Oyston from the penthouse and the millionaire has been served notice to vacate the stadium apartment.
āMr Oyston agreed he is the tenant and bears liability,ā he told the court.
The judge heard that legal proceedings are under way to remove Oyston from the penthouse and the millionaire has been served notice to vacate the stadium apartment.
Lewis_Winthorpe
Well-known member
He is under a company name I think
Satriale's Pork Store
Well-known member
No need to call him a Rapist, Fantasist and Conman!