thecatintheroof
Well-known member
As we're always so good at this!!
Birmingham (h)
Cardiff (a)
Hull (a)
Sheff United (h)
Birmingham (h)
Cardiff (a)
Hull (a)
Sheff United (h)
How many points would you say keep him longer?1 and he’s got to be sacked.
8As we're always so good at this!!
Birmingham (h)
Cardiff (a)
Hull (a)
Sheff United (h)
It is as much about the performance as the points.How many points would you say keep him longer?
Was Wigan a diabolical performance? I don't think it was.It is as much about the performance as the points.
If the performances are vastly improved but we are undone by a piece of rotten luck then that is hard to take but better than a diabolical performance with no sign of any hope.
The second half most certainly wasWas Wigan a diabolical performance? I don't think it was.
No it wasn't. We battled hard with a man short and were 5 minutes from getting a well earned point.The second half most certainly was
No it wasn't. We battled hard with a man short and were 5 minutes from getting a well earned point.
I just thought thus was a bad example. We were worse at WBA for starters. Never got going at all, though they won't be anywhere near the relegation spots. Again, it was very late we conceded, but unlike Wigan, we never looked like scoring.You've always got your tangerine tinted specs on Wiz - not a crime - although I see you've replaced them with your St Georges tonight - again, not a crime - but I am with you all the way here.
If Wigan don't score on 87, 88 whatever, the next day you will hear about a good battling performance.
I know plenty will say but Wigan did score but they are very fine lines and were we really that bad if it was 1-1 after 87 minutes - 70 of which we were a man down.
You'd know more than me but I imagine there must have be other bad performances/results or we wouldn't be second bottom - saying that there is more than half a season still to play and we are 6 points of half-way.
No infact the opposite bearing in mind it was 10 v 11 for much of itWas Wigan a diabolical performance? I don't think it was.
I agree.4, you heard it here