hahahaha .. oh please let that happen .. they'd make right tweets of themselves!Could just be a twatter rumour but apparently some of the people blocked are planning to hold a protest tonight.
Nobbers laughing at us again. Not a good look.Think it’s all rather petty from both sides to be honest.
The club for banning free speech (were not North Korea/Russia) and the protestors for arranging a protest.
Should never have got to this it’s just bad publicity the club could do without.
You get banned off here for less.Think it’s all rather petty from both sides to be honest.
The club for banning free speech (were not North Korea/Russia) and the protestors for arranging a protest.
Should never have got to this it’s just bad publicity the club could do without.
They were given plenty of warnings I believe before being blocked.I don't want to see any Pool fans end up getting banned from the ground for protesting too far.. Maybe the club could have just given them a warning about offensive language on twitter. Everyone should be allowed to voice an opinion but things can change so quickly in football. If we reach Wembley tonight and then beat Bolton Saturday it will all look a bit silly.
To protest about something like this kind of devalues what we all went through with the Oystons. There must be a better way of sorting this with all parties.
Exactly just gets worse.Nobbers laughing at us again. Not a good look.
I didn't know that.They were given plenty of warnings I believe before being blocked.
There is no such thing as completely free speech. The freedom to speak one's mind on any subject is conditioned by the responsibility of the speaker not to speak in a manner that the recipient finds insulting or profaning. Nobody would answer the door to a person who then assaults them verbally, without closing the door on them. There is no obligation to stand and listen to the verbal assault under some misconceived notion that free speech obligates the listener to hear them out.Think it’s all rather petty from both sides to be honest.
The club for banning free speech (were not North Korea/Russia) and the protestors for arranging a protest.
Should never have got to this it’s just bad publicity the club could do without.
All 3 of them? ROWDYCould just be a twatter rumour but apparently some of the people blocked are planning to hold a protest tonight.
Still all rather petty in my opinion from both sides.There is no such thing as completely free speech. The freedom to speak one's mind on any subject is conditioned by the responsibility of the speaker not to speak in a manner that the recipient finds insulting or profaning. Nobody would answer the door to a person who then assaults them verbally, without closing the door on them. There is no obligation to stand and listen to the verbal assault under some misconceived notion that free speech obligates the listener to hear them out.
If that is true then it rules out the pettiness on both sides argument.They were given plenty of warnings I believe before being blocked.
The Club aren’t banning free speech… They’ve just blocked a few people who are persistently spamming their Twitter feed with abusive posts.Think it’s all rather petty from both sides to be honest.
The club for banning free speech (were not North Korea/Russia) and the protestors for arranging a protest.
Should never have got to this it’s just bad publicity the club could do without.
Everyone is assuming they're young lads, from what I've seen of who's been blocked they're all within the range of 35 - 55.Just wait until they are a bit older and have real problems to deal with.
I really hope it’s not a bunch of middle aged blokes protesting about being blocked on Twitter.Everyone is assuming they're young lads, from what I've seen of who's been blocked they're all within the range of 35 - 55.