Given that the question was asked on behalf of a supporters group surely it must be more than 1 or 2 of them who feel aggrieved?Would love to know numbers if anyone has? Surely it must be literally one or two?
To be more precise the question was asked by a supporters group on behalf of a member. Big difference.Given that the question was asked on behalf of a supporters group surely it must be more than 1 or 2 of them who feel aggrieved?
As a prominent group you get the opportunity to ask one question and you address the needs of a single member of that group... really?To be more precise the question was asked by a supporters group on behalf of a member. Big difference.
Who was the person who wanted the question asked? If it's so important to them that they were happy to use a valuable slot in a closed shop meeting to have it asked, surely they'd be prepared to put their own name to it?
We printed our own----------------------------------⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇Nope but they should give some small keepsake like a special ticket stub or certificate to acknowledge the ST holders of the Season of no fans allowed inside
How? I don’t think i got a way to?We printed our own----------------------------------⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇⬇
Whatever happens for next season, as long as I can get free iFollow until it's deemed safe to travel and get into stadiums I'll be relatively happy.It's been a risk ever since we all signed up. It's fair to say we lost out because we couldn't go. But that's how it is and we move on. I'm more concerned about how this might affect season ticket sales going forwards.
i don't do facebook or twitter but it seems it was a topic for discussion on there. As others have said since on later posts, you don't know peoples individuals circumstances and if the question was asked to be raised then it's perfectly valid that it be done. Or do you want to play judge and jury on what can and can't be asked? Need I remind you of when BSA used to run these forums and the abuse they got for it supposedly being censored on what could and couldn't be asked. It wasn't of course but here you are[and TAM] trying to suggest that there should be censorship. If you represent BST official in some official capacity you really do need to consider what you say before rushing in to judge. As Robbie said in an earlier post, it's about transparency and here you are doing anything but. Your posts frankly have been an embarrassment failing to give any consideration to anyones individual circumstances.Who was the person who wanted the question asked? If it's so important to them that they were happy to use a valuable slot in a closed shop meeting to have it asked, surely they'd be prepared to put their own name to it?
Certainly not me either.Certainly not and and looking forward to renewal for next season
20s I don't represent anyone specifically. If BSA want to pose a question like then then let them crack on. My opinion, and it's only that, is that anyone who bought a season ticket this year should have done so with both eyes open.i don't do facebook or twitter but it seems it was a topic for discussion on there. As others have said since on later posts, you don't know peoples individuals circumstances and if the question was asked to be raised then it's perfectly valid that it be done. Or do you want to play judge and jury on what can and can't be asked? Need I remind you of when BSA used to run these forums and the abuse they got for it supposedly being censored on what could and couldn't be asked. It wasn't of course but here you are[and TAM] trying to suggest that there should be censorship. If you represent BST official in some official capacity you really do need to consider what you say before rushing in to judge. As Robbie said in an earlier post, it's about transparency and here you are doing anything but. Your posts frankly have been an embarrassment failing to give any consideration to anyones individual circumstances.
So you've changed your tune! You were initially suggesting some form of censorship of what could and couldn't be asked. You were trying to suppress an individuals right within an organisation to raise a question. That's my only point, Not the rights and wrongs of whether refunds should be offered or not.20s I don't represent anyone specifically. If BSA want to pose a question like then then let them crack on. My opinion, and it's only that, is that anyone who bought a season ticket this year should have done so with both eyes open.