Reform ⬆️ Conservatives ⬇️

For the individual at the expense of the group? For society as a whole? For both?
For everything!

For example, to be ambitious at the expense of the group is not collaborative.

For someone who is fit, healthy and able to work and expects benefits to sit at home, then they don’t fit those values either.

Having an Innovative, Ambitious, Collaborative way of solving the NHS crisis using private health would be fine.
 
For everything!

For example, to be ambitious at the expense of the group is not collaborative.

For someone who is fit, healthy and able to work and expects benefits to sit at home, then they don’t fit those values either.

Having an Innovative, Ambitious, Collaborative way of solving the NHS crisis using private health would be fine.
I don't believe there are people who sit at home fit but wanting benefits in order to skive. I think that's a lazy right wing trope.

That apart, I think your views are valid. I don't know why this would put you off the main parties but it takes all sorts. Honestly One, I know we throw rocks at each other on here but I think there's a good conversation waiting to be had.
 
Refoam at the mouth party. gammon headed right wing shouty bunch of no marks. they will LOSE all their deposits.

I'd hazard a guess that come the election, a large number of voters will never even have heard of Reform. The only people that take any notice of them are shouty red faced racist types.
 
I don't believe there are people who sit at home fit but wanting benefits in order to skive. I think that's a lazy right wing trope.

That apart, I think your views are valid. I don't know why this would put you off the main parties but it takes all sorts. Honestly One, I know we throw rocks at each other on here but I think there's a good conversation waiting to be had.
Sadly there are MANY MANY people playing the system and finding ways to never work.

I do know this from people who work in the Civil Service in this area - and some of the stuff that goes on is definitely innovative!!!

Happy to share over a pint when I am back and have a chat 👍👍

For the avoidance of doubt, this is not some male bollox about meeting for a fight - it’s about having a few beers 🤣🤣🤣🤣

I think regarding the main parties, I am just sick of the race to the bottom with campaigning, and in reality Labour (for me) are worse than the Tory’s at this, or have been recently.

The worst I can remember recently is “Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn’t.”

The quality of current politicians and this sort of campaigning is just woeful.

Twenty to thirty years ish ago, all sides had credible people who you genuinely thought cared, and even if you didn’t agree with them you believed they had the countries best interest at heart.

John McDonald is a very good example of this - a man I will very rarely agree with or would ever vote for, however you know what he stands for and what he really believes - and he sticks to it - that I respect - not the shower that say just what they think the public want to hear.

Theresa May is probably the Tory version - she cares - 90% of her income goes to her charitable foundation. She is straight, principled and hard working. I really think History will judge her better than currently - after all, as PM she was dealt probably the impossible hand.

Rant over! 🧡
 
F@*# @*# #* #£* miserable old #*£#

As for RWNJ's I agree, I think the parents have a lot to answer for.

Remainder of post removed by Rishi Sunak at 14:52
I’ll add Farage should be the first chunt on the punctured dinghy to Rwanda. As for parents no fucker ever listens to them. Now get some bloody work done before IT realises you spend all day on here. 🤣
 
She was Home Secretary for longer than anyone in 50 years, so if she was that bad then I don’t think that would have happened.
It did, she oversaw many changes to the Police Service which has been detrimental since.
The first one who got the 'silent' treatment at the Police Federation Conference during her tenure.
 
It did, she oversaw many changes to the Police Service which has been detrimental since.
The first one who got the 'silent' treatment at the Police Federation Conference during her tenure.
She got harder on drugs and immigration.

Tried to reform the Police - and it still needs reforming.

Anyway - my ‘opinion’ is that there are worse, I appreciate we do not agree 👍
 
I’ll add Farage should be the first chunt on the punctured dinghy to Rwanda. As for parents no fucker ever listens to them. Now get some bloody work done before IT realises you spend all day on here. 🤣
Am not in, you turnip. I've heard Rwanda is nice this time of year though.
 
They do have a manifesto, so that's a lie.

The country is a right mess and the 2 main parties consistently fail over the years, but let's keep voting for them eh....let someone else have a go for me. They'll never vote to get rid of the corrupt voting system themselves, so if people had the bottle we could get a much fairer proportional one.

That's not what they say at all, you're just being ridiculous now, at least be honest and not post you're own opinion as if it's fact.

By election aren't the same as a general election and Rochdale saw some nasty elements involved, but of course it remains to be seen of they can do well.

I'm just finding the polling interesting amd as more learn about then they seem to go up, which seems to upset you...
I think I am the polar opposite to you when it comes to opinion but I totally agree with you when it comes to the electoral system.
We are being forced into a so called democratic system where the two major political parties are occupying the same ground, with one being slightly worse than the other depending on your viewpoint, and billionaires and big business calling the shots.
It works so well in the USA🤦‍♂️!
Why does the UK always copy the worst shit from America?
I'm voting Green I guess JJ is voting Reform, we need to kick Tory and Labour and the voting system into touch and get true representation for all the people and work together to have a long term benefit for the majority and not the elite.
The mega wealthy will always be fine they don't need narrow minded upper working class people to help them!!!
Let's look after ourselves and make the country a better place for the majority, right, left and centre!
 
Last edited:
I don't believe there are people who sit at home fit but wanting benefits in order to skive. I think that's a lazy right wing trope.

That apart, I think your views are valid. I don't know why this would put you off the main parties but it takes all sorts. Honestly One, I know we throw rocks at each other on here but I think there's a good conversation waiting to be had.
I agree with a lot of what you write but there are so many people who have made themselves virtually unemployable through drug and alcohol abuse in our area.
It's a bit of a chicken and egg situation but these people are in essence physically capable but would you want to rely on them or have them fronting your business?
I don't want them to starve but why should they be supported by the state to the extent that they are to continue their dossy existence when people who have generally always been in work struggle to get anything when they hit a rocky patch?
 
Last edited:
I agree with a lot of what you write but there are so many people who have made themselves virtually unemployable through drug and alcohol abuse in our area.
It's a bit of a chicken and egg situation but these people are in essence physically capable but would you want to rely on them or have them fronting your business?
I don't want them to starve but why should they be supported by the state to the extent that they are to continue their dossy existence when people who have generally always been in work struggle to get anything when they hit a rocky patch?
So what’s the answer?

You don’t want them to starve.

But you don’t want to employ them.

And you object to taxpayers supporting them.

Doesn’t leave many options really.
 
So what’s the answer?

You don’t want them to starve.

But you don’t want to employ them.

And you object to taxpayers supporting them.

Doesn’t leave many options really.
It's a really difficult one, I'm not a business person but I'm guessing most business people don't want to employ them.
I don't know where Mexboro is or what sort of place it is but the FY postcodes have a significant number of men in grey joggers that are the worse for wear at all hours that you wouldn't want to work with and probably wouldn't want to employ!
Like I say it's a tough one, I haven't got an answer but I can see the problem.
 
It's a really difficult one, I'm not a business person but I'm guessing most business people don't want to employ them.
I don't know where Mexboro is or what sort of place it is but the FY postcodes have a significant number of men in grey joggers that are the worse for wear at all hours that you wouldn't want to work with and probably wouldn't want to employ!
Like I say it's a tough one, I haven't got an answer but I can see the problem.
That’s why I think the “cut their benefits and they’ll have to work” mantra isn’t very convincing.

Presumably Richard Tice will be first in the queue to offer employment to these people?

If not, why does he expect other business owners to do so?

I think this falls into the “not really thought this through have we?” category.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gjr
Saw a video before and it said pollsters said if Farage got involved it might add 5 points to reforms polling. It might take reform up past the tories in certain polls anyway.
 
I agree with a lot of what you write but there are so many people who have made themselves virtually unemployable through drug and alcohol abuse in our area.
It's a bit of a chicken and egg situation but these people are in essence physically capable but would you want to rely on them or have them fronting your business?
I don't want them to starve but why should they be supported by the state to the extent that they are to continue their dossy existence when people who have generally always been in work struggle to get anything when they hit a rocky patch?
But I chose my words carefully. The people you describe are not fit. Whether through, alcohol, drugs or some other mental difficulty, they are not fully functioning. I agree that it suits no-one to fund such lifestyles and the answer needs to involve better housing, employment and education.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gjr
I think I am the polar opposite to you when it comes to opinion but I totally agree with you when it comes to the electoral system.
We are being forced into a so called democratic system where the two major political parties are occupying the same ground, with one being slightly worse than the other depending on your viewpoint, and billionaires and big business calling the shots.
It works so well in the USA🤦‍♂️!
Why does the UK always copy the worst shit from America?
I'm voting Green I guess JJ is voting Reform, we need to kick Tory and Labour and the voting system into touch and get true representation for all the people and work together to have a long term benefit for the majority and not the elite.
The mega wealthy will always be fine they don't need narrow minded upper working class people to help them!!!
Let's look after ourselves and make the country a better place for the majority, right, left and centre!
No surprise to anyone that I vote Labour, but I agree 100% about the electoral system. I wonder what the result would be in a referendum re PR now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gjr
Sadly there are MANY MANY people playing the system and finding ways to never work.

I do know this from people who work in the Civil Service in this area - and some of the stuff that goes on is definitely innovative!!!

Happy to share over a pint when I am back and have a chat 👍👍

For the avoidance of doubt, this is not some male bollox about meeting for a fight - it’s about having a few beers 🤣🤣🤣🤣

I think regarding the main parties, I am just sick of the race to the bottom with campaigning, and in reality Labour (for me) are worse than the Tory’s at this, or have been recently.

The worst I can remember recently is “Do you think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison? Rishi Sunak doesn’t.”

The quality of current politicians and this sort of campaigning is just woeful.

Twenty to thirty years ish ago, all sides had credible people who you genuinely thought cared, and even if you didn’t agree with them you believed they had the countries best interest at heart.

John McDonald is a very good example of this - a man I will very rarely agree with or would ever vote for, however you know what he stands for and what he really believes - and he sticks to it - that I respect - not the shower that say just what they think the public want to hear.

Theresa May is probably the Tory version - she cares - 90% of her income goes to her charitable foundation. She is straight, principled and hard working. I really think History will judge her better than currently - after all, as PM she was dealt probably the impossible hand.

Rant over! 🧡
I'll add to that with Tony Benn and Dennis Skinner. I didn't necessarily agree with their views but they had integrity and convictions. Unlike the present woeful bunch. I really can't see me voting at the next GE. I wouldn't want it on my conscience, voting for any of the self serving wankers.
 
That’s why I think the “cut their benefits and they’ll have to work” mantra isn’t very convincing.

Presumably Richard Tice will be first in the queue to offer employment to these people?

If not, why does he expect other business owners to do so?

I think this falls into the “not really thought this through have we?” category.
Unfortunately they don't have to think things through and come up with a logical solution to get votes.
Farage has made a career out of foghorning perceived issues and problems but how many answers and solutions has he come up with?
The British electorate doesn't do enough lateral, logical, critical or free thinking so it's no surprise that the majority of our politicians can continue to blow their dog whistles and tell us all the things they don't like, without giving workable answers and still get elected.
Whole thing needs a massive shakeup!
 
I'll add to that with Tony Benn and Dennis Skinner. I didn't necessarily agree with their views but they had integrity and convictions
Rusty, Tony Benn was my MP for years (at Chesterfield) and was frankly useless. I had a personal issue regarding placement of my son at a school and he was terrible, all he seemed to be bothered about was his 'profile'.He was very lazy.

Likewise Skinner was MP at neighbouring Bolsover and the local Council was packed with his family. Integrity....hmmmm. Decent politician but nah integrity and convictions is very debatable.
 
Always assuming they have any candidates left. 3 forced out in the last 48 hours due to the most appalling tweets, even Reform can't stomach them.

Anyway, if Farage becoms an American citizen to become US Ambassador, how does that work with his owning Reform ltd?
It's not a party, its a private company, so nothing changes.
 
I'll add to that with Tony Benn and Dennis Skinner. I didn't necessarily agree with their views but they had integrity and convictions. Unlike the present woeful bunch. I really can't see me voting at the next GE. I wouldn't want it on my conscience, voting for any of the self serving wankers.
As I always say on this subject it is important that people turn out to vote. It is democracy in action. If you don't want to vote for any of the candidates then write "none of the above" on the paper. Spoilt ballots are counted and declared in the result.
 
I doubt they will have to defend it to be honest, because if Labour produced a document with no evidence, with all their spending and savings listed in a table that would fit into one page, I'm pretty sure that would be big news. They'd be slaughtered, and rightly so. I'm keenly engaged with politics, and I didn't even know Reform published a manifesto. Not that I'm on top of absolutely everything of course, but I'm one of hte 99.9% of people in this country who doesn't have a Telegraph subscription. It has been vastly overshadowed in the news. I have barely heard of it. It's not exactly being held up to scrutiny. Perhaps it will be later down the line.

My definition of a 'costed manifesto' is one that has detail. That has supportive evidence, that shows where it gets its numbers from, which doesn't leave out huge parts of our country such as transport, housing and water treatment. It actually references external, independent data and shows you the working out. If your definition of costed is they put some round numbers on a table with no extra information, no breakdown, just topline numbers with no supportive data or evidence, then yes, the manifesto reaches your definition of costed. But for me, and I'm sure pretty much everyone else, that is not enough. Because that does nothing. It is completely meaningless. It could be any number pulled out of a hat. That's not fully costed in my book. We can quibble over semantics if you want, or we can discuss the real meaning behind my post, which was 'just give them a go' is not a good idea in my opinion, considering their current lack of infrastructure and policy detail.
There won't be anything on the environment because they are against the green agenda, and want to increase the use of fossil fuels. Net zero is nonsense to them.

Bear in mind they are not a political party but a private company owned by Farage.
 
There won't be anything on the environment because they are against the green agenda, and want to increase the use of fossil fuels. Net zero is nonsense to them.

Bear in mind they are not a political party but a private company owned by Farage.
Their energy section is laughably bad. Just easily debunked theories copied from Twitter comments. The atmosphere is only 0.4% carbon dioxide so how can it be that bad? Well, because we live in a goldilocks planet which harbours the only known life in the solar system and likely the only intelligent life in the entire galaxy, so the ecosystem tends to be a little delicate and a 0.1% change here or there is actually literally what keeps us all alive. One of their few energy 'policies' is to end renewable subsidies and drill more north sea oil even though it's questionable at best the amount of resource we can affordably extract and nobody who knows anything about this believes it would have any impact on market price, and Reform also don't seem to know we spend more money subsidizing fossil fuels than we do renewables, and that the hard work in this area has already been done. Battery and solar power prices are getting exponentially cheaper by the day without government intervention. Just a piss poor weak effort all around.
 
Reform will get plenty of votes from working class Xenophobes. The " Red Wall" constituency.voters who gave their vote to the Tories will be split between voting for Labour or Reform.Especially if those" nasty illegals" are still here and not in Rwanda.🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: gjr
What makes the polling fascinating is that half the country probably hasn't yet heard of Reform.

 
What makes the polling fascinating is that half the country probably hasn't yet heard of Reform.

I said that earlier in the thread. Only people interested in politics will have even heard of them.

Anyone thinks they will make a jot of difference to either of the main parties is deluded.
 
I said that earlier in the thread. Only people interested in politics will have even heard of them.

Anyone thinks they will make a jot of difference to either of the main parties is deluded.
It's always very difficult in the FPTP system, but like NF says, Labour will win and if people think and know that they may vote with more freedom and as he says, the tories are finished, for this election anyway.

Plenty of time to grow yet and when announced the TV coverage begins they'll gain a lot more mindshare.

As for making a difference they certainly are to the tories.
 
It's always very difficult in the FPTP system, but like NF says, Labour will win and if people think and know that they may vote with more freedom and as he says, the tories are finished, for this election anyway.

Plenty of time to grow yet and when announced the TV coverage begins they'll gain a lot more mindshare.

As for making a difference they certainly are to the tories.
More so to Labour. If, what you say is true they are the gift that will keep Labour in government for decades.
 
More so to Labour. If, what you say is true they are the gift that will keep Labour in government for decades.
Don't forget that the rise of the nationalists severely hampered Labour's vote. had Labour retained their Scottish seats they could have formed a minority Government in 2017.
 
There are some staggering posts on this board at times. The OP was right up there with the worst of them.

It increasingly looks like the right of centre vote is going to fragment in much the same way as happened on the left in 1983 and 1987. The main difference is that neither of the two parties involved this time is seriously trying to appeal to the centre ground. It does make the outcome difficult to predict - but I think our politics may become more polarised than it has ever been.

Starmer's decision to purge his party of the lunatics and bigots looks more astute by the day. He may end up being the only place that One Nation Conservatives can go this time.
Aren't you contradicting yourself?
"neither of ther two (main) parties is appealing to the centre ground" but (Starmer) "may end up being the only place that 1 nation Cons. can go this time"
 
Aren't you contradicting yourself?
"neither of ther two (main) parties is appealing to the centre ground" but (Starmer) "may end up being the only place that 1 nation Cons. can go this time"
No, you've misread it.

The word (main) in brackets is your word, I didn't use it. The two parties I was referring to were the two that are right of centre (Conservatives and Reform).
 
Rusty, Tony Benn was my MP for years (at Chesterfield) and was frankly useless. I had a personal issue regarding placement of my son at a school and he was terrible, all he seemed to be bothered about was his 'profile'.He was very lazy.

Likewise Skinner was MP at neighbouring Bolsover and the local Council was packed with his family. Integrity....hmmmm. Decent politician but nah integrity and convictions is very debatable.
That may be so but I'd still take both of them over the current shower of shite
 
The actual words politics and politicians need changing, they’ve become the words for do what we think is best for us, instead of what is best for the people. I can’t think of a suitable alternative, except servants and service. I’m sure some on here can find words to describe people who genuinely have our best interests at heart.
 
I read they weren't standing in Blackpool, not sure if something changed or if that was just wrong info.


Either way, they've gone for Mark Butcher, who I believe stood as an independent before and also runs the soup kitchen amazing grace and also the highly rated pizza place, pizza grazie.


Be interesting to see if they can do anything from a standing start, given the amount of moaning people in Blackpool do about the local labour council...
 
I read they weren't standing in Blackpool, not sure if something changed or if that was just wrong info.


Either way, they've gone for Mark Butcher, who I believe stood as an independent before and also runs the soup kitchen amazing grace and also the highly rated pizza place, pizza grazie.


Be interesting to see if they can do anything from a standing start, given the amount of moaning people in Blackpool do about the local labour council...
Excellent work on the first photo.
 
Hopefully they've vetted him a bit more than some of the other candidates they've had to drop recently. At least he's got a better background, having set up a food bank. Must have had some interesting conversations with 30p Lee on the campaign, since he doesn't think food poverty exists in Britain?

They should be aiming for 20% at least, anything under and it will confirm more my suspicions they aren't converting their polling into votes when the time comes.
 
There are some staggering posts on this board at times. The OP was right up there with the worst of them.

It increasingly looks like the right of centre vote is going to fragment in much the same way as happened on the left in 1983 and 1987. The main difference is that neither of the two parties involved this time is seriously trying to appeal to the centre ground. It does make the outcome difficult to predict - but I think our politics may become more polarised than it has ever been.

Starmer's decision to purge his party of the lunatics and bigots looks more astute by the day. He may end up being the only place that One Nation Conservatives can go this time.
In recent times Labour have won with centralist policies. Despite this the arrogant, agenda driven right wing still think they can be successful by the politics of fear.
For the record I am a conservative with a small c, as I still do not trust Labour with finances. Before anyone starts on the state of our current finances, imagine where we would be without covid and the wars. The banking crisis did for Labour and covid/ wars will do the same for the Conservatives. Floating voters cast their vote on how well off they feel, so the Consevatives have both hands tied behind their back.
 
Back
Top