TangerineMatt
Well-known member
According to Scrafton, terms were agreed with us, but he opted for Sunderland instead. Heartbreaking
Guessing it's all down to wages as Sunderland can offer much bigger wages than we can.
I don't think it is, fee agreed suggests it is a permanent signing.It's a loan.
Have we?Fortunately we've got a squad good enough to stay up, wish we'd have landed a Ballard or a Simms to get that positivity back.
Agreed, although I think Appleton sees things differently. We absolutely had to throw our hat in the ring for Simms though, just gutted we couldn't land him, it really would have been a huge lift.Don't see a striker as a priority signing unless we're shifting players.
Rather spend the money on a midfielder or a LW.
I don't think it is, fee agreed suggests it is a permanent signing.
Let's face it, you'd always want to go to Sunderland over us. Even though he'll have enjoyed his time here. Sunderland building a good squad.
Someone at our end thinks he is good enough if they've gone back in to try to sign him for the season.Not good enough.......move on.
We won’t!Well finish above them
Loan fcScrafton said loan.
Sunderland went for simms because Parrot chose us over SunderlandSounds like we matched their bid for Simms but he preferred to go to Sunderland. Can't fault the club for this one.