Tourist Tax

Many European cities have gone down this route so not sure why it is a bad thing.
Do all the Man U and City fans have to pay tourist tax when they come from down South
I can understand places where they get too many tourists so want to put people off to limit numbers, like those swamped by mass tourism such as Venice, or natural beauty areas to protect wildlife etc, but a place like Manchester with its homeless and so many poor districts? Maybe it's to put people off coming to see what a hole many areas are.
 
Introduced for Manchester of all places. They should feel lucky anyone would want to go there.

What a great way to piss people off so they go back home and tell others not to bother.
It's starting off at £1 but you can be sure it'll soon rise year on year. And it'll be interesting to see where it's spent.
Barcelona have just raised their tax. In Cambrils last year it cost us about 70 Euros & similar in Menorca, as the Europeans often charge PP and not per room.
 
It's starting off at £1 but you can be sure it'll soon rise year on year. And it'll be interesting to see where it's spent.
Barcelona have just raised their tax. In Cambrils last year it cost us about 70 Euros & similar in Menorca, as the Europeans often charge PP and not per room.
Exactly. It will start as a token tourist tax designed to regenerate the town, but will go nowhere near touristy things or to help local residents. Then it will increase faster than a fast thing. For a town like Blackpool that depends on tourism it would be a disaster.
 
They'll be charging to go for a piss next..........................................ooh errr
 
Because we're solely a tourist destination.
With respect, no we are not.
People come to Blackpool for various reasons e.g. tourism, visiting family, business, sports events, theatre etc etc.
Blackpool may have a smaller percentage of visitors for business purposes than say Manchester but that doesn't make us solely a tourist destination.
 
I recall paying tourist taxes abroad decades ago. As someone said earlier, it's' quite common in many European cities, and it's becoming more common to the UK too.
Tax is a bit of a dirty word, so I would rather see such charges presented in a more positive light. Such as a visitors charge, or a sustainability charge or a green levy or a Future Blackpool charge. But you get the idea hopefully. It needs to be a positively marketed charge so as not to dissuade potential visitors.
Blackpool does indeed benefit in various ways from tourism. So in effect, we are getting money already from tourists. But sadly, that money isn't really enough, because as we know Blackpool has a plethora of issues. Many of which are a direct result of it primarily being a tourism town.

A visitors charge could be a great opportunity to further improve the town, and the prospects of the residents.

There's so many things the money could be used for. E.g roads, waste collection, cleaning the beaches, subsidised housing, employment training, carbon reduction towards net zero, etc etc.
So I wouldn't immediately dismiss the idea.

One has to consider whether such a charge would be fair. We have many visitor that come along, drop litter, use the public services, the roads, and generate cost for additional police and bin emptying amongst other things. We have the illuminations for which many merely drive through without paying a penny. So I'd say it would be fair enough to have such a charge. There's many precedents out there which show they can be introduced effectively and successfully.

One of the challenges would be how to levy and administer it. But with technology this should be quite easily done. One way could be to add a small charge to a hotel and B&B rooms e.g. £1 a night per person. But there could be various other ways.

I do feel that the levy would need to be governed carefully so that the money was ring-fenced and not merely subsumed into the councils coffers to be used in any which way. As with the National Lottery it would be a positive story to show how the money had been used to improve the area.

I'd welcome a group to be established to include citizens, the council, business leaders, charities and others to decide on how the money would be spent. Locals and local business folk could submit ideas for consideration, prioritisation and approval.

In summary, I'd be all for such a charge if it was marketed positively, and if the funds raised were used for local people for local initiatives.
 
With respect, no we are not.
People come to Blackpool for various reasons e.g. tourism, visiting family, business, sports events, theatre etc etc.
Blackpool may have a smaller percentage of visitors for business purposes than say Manchester but that doesn't make us solely a tourist destination.
It was literally built as a tourist destination.
 
An extra quid is nothing and Manchester is nice to visit.
 
I recall paying tourist taxes abroad decades ago. As someone said earlier, it's' quite common in many European cities, and it's becoming more common to the UK too.
Tax is a bit of a dirty word, so I would rather see such charges presented in a more positive light. Such as a visitors charge, or a sustainability charge or a green levy or a Future Blackpool charge. But you get the idea hopefully. It needs to be a positively marketed charge so as not to dissuade potential visitors.
Blackpool does indeed benefit in various ways from tourism. So in effect, we are getting money already from tourists. But sadly, that money isn't really enough, because as we know Blackpool has a plethora of issues. Many of which are a direct result of it primarily being a tourism town.

A visitors charge could be a great opportunity to further improve the town, and the prospects of the residents.

There's so many things the money could be used for. E.g roads, waste collection, cleaning the beaches, subsidised housing, employment training, carbon reduction towards net zero, etc etc.
So I wouldn't immediately dismiss the idea.

One has to consider whether such a charge would be fair. We have many visitor that come along, drop litter, use the public services, the roads, and generate cost for additional police and bin emptying amongst other things. We have the illuminations for which many merely drive through without paying a penny. So I'd say it would be fair enough to have such a charge. There's many precedents out there which show they can be introduced effectively and successfully.

One of the challenges would be how to levy and administer it. But with technology this should be quite easily done. One way could be to add a small charge to a hotel and B&B rooms e.g. £1 a night per person. But there could be various other ways.

I do feel that the levy would need to be governed carefully so that the money was ring-fenced and not merely subsumed into the councils coffers to be used in any which way. As with the National Lottery it would be a positive story to show how the money had been used to improve the area.

I'd welcome a group to be established to include citizens, the council, business leaders, charities and others to decide on how the money would be spent. Locals and local business folk could submit ideas for consideration, prioritisation and approval.

In summary, I'd be all for such a charge if it was marketed positively, and if the funds raised were used for local people for local initiatives.
But we all know it'll just end up in the pot rather than targeting specific things, or the budgets will be reduced because of it. What about day trippers perhaps a toll booth at the end of the M55 😬 now how many people are there in that car & is that a dog hiding in the floor well?
Perhaps we could just tax taxi drivers. 😂
 
But we all know it'll just end up in the pot rather than targeting specific things, or the budgets will be reduced because of it. What about day trippers perhaps a toll booth at the end of the M55 😬 now how many people are there in that car & is that a dog hiding in the floor well?
Perhaps we could just tax taxi drivers. 😂
Like the toll booth on the Lights. The town will be inundated with chip wrappers and tin cans. What will we do with all that?
 
But we all know it'll just end up in the pot rather than targeting specific things, or the budgets will be reduced because of it. What about day trippers perhaps a toll booth at the end of the M55 😬 now how many people are there in that car & is that a dog hiding in the floor well?
Perhaps we could just tax taxi drivers. 😂

As I say, such charges are in use elsewhere around the country and Europe. We can be negative and cynical, or we can see the positive side. The choice is yours.
 
There’s the potential to generate extra money for the town. A deprived town. These charges do generate extra money as has been proven wherever they’ve been introduced.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It'll put people off, a lot arrive on a whim.
I think if it's done right it can work. Me I'd charge £1 per bed, BUT that £1 would entitle you to discount vouchers for local attractions/pubs etc. Obviously, you and I know these would be tokenism, but the tourist may see them as value and actually may visit the Sea Life centre or the Zoo, Model Village, Village Idiot, only available until 9th May, as a result.
 
As always, the devil is in the detail. Living in the Cairngorm National park, how do you charge visitors? Bed tax when many wild camp or are in camper vans ( and I mean many, at times the majority). Both the latter don't even pay for their waste disposal now, just fill all the local bins.

All for it if it is for everyone, and if the revenue is ring fenced for local facilities.
 
Must admit we prefer Shipley (handy for trains to Leeds & York too) & Saltaire to run down 'Bratford'. Although the shopping centre that was once owned by Westfield is an improvement.
Bradford are knocking down the Kirkgate Centre and building City Centre housing, also same with the Oastler Market, Ivegate has cheap pubs but it's very dodgy, drunks and druggies loitering, Bradford is decent for shopping but is not a nice place, City of culture......hardly👎
 
Put a tax on regular people taking a vacation, whilst leaving the big companies exploiting their numerous tax loopholes well alone. ** brilliant idea. Anyone doing often needless business travel will still be exempt as well.
 
Put a tax on regular people taking a vacation, whilst leaving the big companies exploiting their numerous tax loopholes well alone. ** brilliant idea. Anyone doing often needless business travel will still be exempt as well.
It's not an either or. Why does every topic always have to come down to a rant about how big companies should pay? It's ridiculous tunnel vision as if it's the silver bullet to all society's woes.
Money can come from more than one source. We are talking about a tourist tax, which the proceeds from would be used locally. You can have a valid issue with Google or BP, but it isn't the same issue. They're two distinctly different things which can, and should, be managed separately.
You're getting ahead of yourself when determining that anyone travelling for business would be exempt. Not necessarily. If it were a charge per person per hotel room, they would not be asking if you were there for tourism as no-one would own up to that if they thought it would lead to them being charged.
You seem to have a warped view of business people in saying their travel is often needless. That's unfounded and can't be substantiated.
So overall your post is a bit of a misguided rant at 'business' - which takes me back to my point about money coming from various sources - one of the main ones being business and businesses - without which we'd all be a lot poorer and many of us would be without employment.
 
Not a fan of the concept you simply can't compare someone paying to go to Barcelona than coming to our town.

Raising funds is fine but I think it becomes a PR disaster if others don't charge it has to be all or nothing for me.

There surely has to be a better way of bringing in money.
 
Back
Top