When you have a corrupt Government!

The biggest tragedy is there is no opposition party capable of taking them to task...this labour party is still shackled by the spectre of Corbyn and without a total overhaul will never be electable...that equates to a free ride for the Bozo party. This is one of the worst political periods in my lifetime and there are very few credible MPs out there. How can a party be so incompetent and have the likes of Hancock,Johnson, Jenrick and Gavin Williamson at the helm and STILL top the polls and be favourites to win the next election?
 
The biggest tragedy is there is no opposition party capable of taking them to task...this labour party is still shackled by the spectre of Corbyn and without a total overhaul will never be electable...that equates to a free ride for the Bozo party. This is one of the worst political periods in my lifetime and there are very few credible MPs out there. How can a party be so incompetent and have the likes of Hancock,Johnson, Jenrick and Gavin Williamson at the helm and STILL top the polls and be favourites to win the next election?
Stop worrying, democracy rules in elections, accept your fate it will never be as bad as the lies in The Grauniad Now slam some British beef in the oven, peel some Maris Pipers, and rustle up some Yorkshire puddings.🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
 
The biggest tragedy is there is no opposition party capable of taking them to task...this labour party is still shackled by the spectre of Corbyn and without a total overhaul will never be electable...that equates to a free ride for the Bozo party. This is one of the worst political periods in my lifetime and there are very few credible MPs out there. How can a party be so incompetent and have the likes of Hancock,Johnson, Jenrick and Gavin Williamson at the helm and STILL top the polls and be favourites to win the next election?
Because they made Brexit happen to kill off UKIP which then gave them an exclusive base of 40% of the population who will always vote for centre right parties.
Labour, Lib Democrats, Greens and all the nationalist parties split the centre left vote.
First past the post electoral system does the rest.
When it comes to making the most of their core support and winning elections the Conservatives know what they are doing, shame they don't apply the same clear headed thinking into making the UK a better place for everyone and not just the people who throw millions in donations at them.
 
Because they made Brexit happen to kill off UKIP which then gave them an exclusive base of 40% of the population who will always vote for centre right parties.
Labour, Lib Democrats, Greens and all the nationalist parties split the centre left vote.
First past the post electoral system does the rest.
When it comes to making the most of their core support and winning elections the Conservatives know what they are doing, shame they don't apply the same clear headed thinking into making the UK a better place for everyone and not just the people who throw millions in donations at them.
There is an opportunity for the Lib Dems to peel off a lot of Tory voters if they can align themselves with the people who have been alienated by this Govts destruction of our liberties.
 
There is an opportunity for the Lib Dems to peel off a lot of Tory voters if they can align themselves with the people who have been alienated by this Govts destruction of our liberties.
The centre left parties need to realise that they have to work together. i am in Fylde, Menzies has a job for life with first past the post and the opposition vote split 3 ways, then throw in the huge number of people who just don't vote because there is no point(that's me).
Leave one major opposition party to contest the safe seats and we might shake things up a bit.
Personally I think government should be made up of the best people from right to left working for the benefit of the population, it would be less divisive.
 
The centre left parties need to realise that they have to work together. i am in Fylde, Menzies has a job for life with first past the post and the opposition vote split 3 ways, then throw in the huge number of people who just don't vote because there is no point(that's me).
Leave one major opposition party to contest the safe seats and we might shake things up a bit.
Personally I think government should be made up of the best people from right to left working for the benefit of the population, it would be less divisive.
Gjr69, you write interesting and thoughtful stuff but I cannot let your 'no point in voting' comment pass. It is a civic duty that every adult should vote. I would make it compulsory.
I understand what you mean about it seeming pointless if you personally oppose a 'job for life' incumbent of a safe seat. But that ignores the fact that the only reason both Governments and Parliament get a mandate in this country is because we, the electorate, give it to them. Without that authority they are nothing. By participating in the election you grant that authority - whether you vote for the winning party or not. If you don't vote you give any Government carte-blanche to behave as they wish with impunity. Also, a response of, "so what? I don't care" (not my assessment of you btw), is the same as saying "I refuse to take my obligations to democracy seriously and am happy to freeload on the back of others."
 
Latest polls have the 13 point lead cut to 4 as the vaccine bounce loses favour with the surge in cases.

People realising that piss ups in breweries are beyond the capabilities of this government.
 
Gjr69, you write interesting and thoughtful stuff but I cannot let your 'no point in voting' comment pass. It is a civic duty that every adult should vote. I would make it compulsory.
I understand what you mean about it seeming pointless if you personally oppose a 'job for life' incumbent of a safe seat. But that ignores the fact that the only reason both Governments and Parliament get a mandate in this country is because we, the electorate, give it to them. Without that authority they are nothing. By participating in the election you grant that authority - whether you vote for the winning party or not. If you don't vote you give any Government carte-blanche to behave as they wish with impunity. Also, a response of, "so what? I don't care" (not my assessment of you btw), is the same as saying "I refuse to take my obligations to democracy seriously and am happy to freeload on the back of others."
If everyone who doesn't bother came out and voted, Menzies would be put of a job.
 
I think you might be right, people say it's a 'wasted' vote but it's that mindset that continues the fairly useless two party system.
I’d say the last decade particularly has shown how broken our options are?

The Torys never change - they are exactly as they always were which makes me surprised that Cat gets so hot under the collar about them. You know exactly what you’ll get with the Torys - when I read stories of corruption and self interest it’s almost like reading that an alcoholic got drunk…. This is our class system and it’s what we do.
The opposition parties have been rudderless, tepid, frightened and devoid of inspiration. If I vote Labour it’d probably a marginally more socialist version of what we have now.

So bollocks to it. I’m going all Greta Thunderpants and giving my little vote to a party who might just do something that will influence our future in a good way?

Over time, we might just find people starting to prioritise not drowning in rising flood waters and baking summers where lighting sets houses on fire - over whether corporation tax is 19% or 20% (unless you’re a bit corporate then it’s whatever you want it to be) or income tax is set at 20% or 21%.
 
I’d say the last decade particularly has shown how broken our options are?

The Torys never change - they are exactly as they always were which makes me surprised that Cat gets so hot under the collar about them. You know exactly what you’ll get with the Torys - when I read stories of corruption and self interest it’s almost like reading that an alcoholic got drunk…. This is our class system and it’s what we do.
The opposition parties have been rudderless, tepid, frightened and devoid of inspiration. If I vote Labour it’d probably a marginally more socialist version of what we have now.

So bollocks to it. I’m going all Greta Thunderpants and giving my little vote to a party who might just do something that will influence our future in a good way?

Over time, we might just find people starting to prioritise not drowning in rising flood waters and baking summers where lighting sets houses on fire - over whether corporation tax is 19% or 20% (unless you’re a bit corporate then it’s whatever you want it to be) or income tax is set at 20% or 21%.
And all they need for the British electorate to get on board is half arsedly promise some random individual tax cuts, be a bit vague about literally everything else and possibly get some Union Jacks in.
 
Has anyone got any clue what the Labour Party policies are right now? I googled it and it just came up with 2019 manifesto.
 
Has anyone got any clue what the Labour Party policies are right now? I googled it and it just came up with 2019 manifesto.
Genuinely no idea at all?

I remember Corbyns sound bites around free broadband and sitting on the fence on Brexit but beyond that nothing. I’ve said it so many times on here this year, with the current government being a total clusterfuck how on Earth are Labour so insignificant?
 
Gjr69, you write interesting and thoughtful stuff but I cannot let your 'no point in voting' comment pass. It is a civic duty that every adult should vote. I would make it compulsory.
I understand what you mean about it seeming pointless if you personally oppose a 'job for life' incumbent of a safe seat. But that ignores the fact that the only reason both Governments and Parliament get a mandate in this country is because we, the electorate, give it to them. Without that authority they are nothing. By participating in the election you grant that authority - whether you vote for the winning party or not. If you don't vote you give any Government carte-blanche to behave as they wish with impunity. Also, a response of, "so what? I don't care" (not my assessment of you btw), is the same as saying "I refuse to take my obligations to democracy seriously and am happy to freeload on the back of others."
Thank you for the kind words 66. I think my disillusionment comes from the electoral system we have in place. I appreciate what you are saying but my vote in Fylde carries no weight whatsoever and I think a massive chunk of the population will feel the same no matter who holds the safe seat.
Maybe I should spoil my voting slip with a constructive comment!
 
If everyone who doesn't bother came out and voted, Menzies would be put of a job.
Maybe if we had a 2 horse race he would be but as long as Labour, Lib Democrats and Green all put up a candidate he knows he is as safe as houses. Unfortunately.
 
Genuinely no idea at all?

I remember Corbyns sound bites around free broadband and sitting on the fence on Brexit but beyond that nothing. I’ve said it so many times on here this year, with the current government being a total clusterfuck how on Earth are Labour so insignificant?
They need to fully exorcise the ghost of Corbyn who has damaged the party beyond belief...Starmer hasnt done that yet and looks a weak politician as a consequence... I think there are better options to get the labour party back on track but they need to cut out the looney left to move forward.
 
Thank you for the kind words 66. I think my disillusionment comes from the electoral system we have in place. I appreciate what you are saying but my vote in Fylde carries no weight whatsoever and I think a massive chunk of the population will feel the same no matter who holds the safe seat.
Maybe I should spoil my voting slip with a constructive comment!
I've thought of that, but it's not like the parties see it, just some tired ballot worker who literally doesn't care less at 3am.
 
Thank you for the kind words 66. I think my disillusionment comes from the electoral system we have in place. I appreciate what you are saying but my vote in Fylde carries no weight whatsoever and I think a massive chunk of the population will feel the same no matter who holds the safe seat.
Maybe I should spoil my voting slip with a constructive comment!
Exactly! I always say it to young people who say, "my vote counts for nothing." Spoil your ballot paper. Spoilt papers are always counted and declared at the count. Yes, some are people who get it wrong - even then, the returning officer will always try to let a vote count if it's obvious what was intended. But, at present, for those who want to complain about feeling disenfranchised, a spoilt papers is the way to announce it.
In my ideal of compulsory voting I would insist on a 'none of the above' option.
 
Exactly! I always say it to young people who say, "my vote counts for nothing." Spoil your ballot paper. Spoilt papers are always counted and declared at the count. Yes, some are people who get it wrong - even then, the returning officer will always try to let a vote count if it's obvious what was intended. But, at present, for those who want to complain about feeling disenfranchised, a spoilt papers is the way to announce it.
In my ideal of compulsory voting I would insist on a 'none of the above' option.
They'll never go for a 'none of the above' as a constitutional crisis could very quickly take effect if, as likely, that won.
 
They'll never go for a 'none of the above' as a constitutional crisis could very quickly take effect if, as likely, that won.
Wouldn't that concentrate the minds of the Westminster village?! Wouldn't it? A turnout of 99% and no result? That would be magnificent. It would have to be investigated...a public (not Parliamentary or Govt) enquiry. It could lead to proportional representation, at least as a trial. Now that is democracy!
 
Don’t know if the o/p regularly reads threads after his opening salvo - as a rule he tends to go to ground.

But, on the off chance - here’s a genuine question….

Whilst, ever so subtly, you’ve awakened so many of us to the (For the sake of discussion) ‘accepted’ fact that the current government may not have performed entirely as one would have hoped (Thanks for that - we’d never have worked it out for ourselves without your gentle guidance) - I would genuinely ask for whom would you suggest we vote next?

For me, it’s insufficient to say ‘Anything but Tory’, as a) At best, it’s a totally negative stance & I’d rather vote FOR something, than simply against the current regime & b) Such an argument can lead voters potentially ‘out of the frying pan’ e.g. voting for candidates such as George Galloway, as has been seen recently.

I’m genuinely struggling, for all its accepted faults, to see a realistic alternative & would welcome a positive endorsement of same, with supporting reasons from the o/p, rather than his repeated negative viewpoint, which by now I suspect we all have the gist of.
 
Wouldn't that concentrate the minds of the Westminster village?! Wouldn't it? A turnout of 99% and no result? That would be magnificent. It would have to be investigated...a public (not Parliamentary or Govt) enquiry. It could lead to proportional representation, at least as a trial. Now that is democracy!
What happens in the meantime though? No government?

Pretty much as now then.
 
Don’t know if the o/p regularly reads threads after his opening salvo - as a rule he tends to go to ground.

But, on the off chance - here’s a genuine question….

Whilst, ever so subtly, you’ve awakened so many of us to the (For the sake of discussion) ‘accepted’ fact that the current government may not have performed entirely as one would have hoped (Thanks for that - we’d never have worked it out for ourselves without your gentle guidance) - I would genuinely ask for whom would you suggest we vote next?

For me, it’s insufficient to say ‘Anything but Tory’, as a) At best, it’s a totally negative stance & I’d rather vote FOR something, than simply against the current regime & b) Such an argument can lead voters potentially ‘out of the frying pan’ e.g. voting for candidates such as George Galloway, as has been seen recently.

I’m genuinely struggling, for all its accepted faults, to see a realistic alternative & would welcome a positive endorsement of same, with supporting reasons from the o/p, rather than his repeated negative viewpoint, which by now I suspect we all have the gist of.
That's a very good question - no, not patronising. It does, however, raise questions about the dictatorship of Government: like it or lump it for 5 years then you get a vote.
Actually, there are lots of opportunities to show disdain in our leaders: by-elections, county and borough elections, mayoral elections, polling responses. Of course, none of these get rid of a Government but, believe me, they really do concentrate the minds of those in power. In the Conservative Party, backbench MPs who can see their seat going west will soon be calling for heads through the 1922 Committee. Labour MPs will feel the hands of the NEC and the unions on their collar. So, not a complete dictatorship but, it is true that our opportunities to press the Government are relatively few.
 
I have said before that the centre left parties need to agree a deal to change the voting system once and for all. Bring forward legislation to scrap the first past the post system followed by a general election under the new system
 
Exactly! I always say it to young people who say, "my vote counts for nothing." Spoil your ballot paper. Spoilt papers are always counted and declared at the count. Yes, some are people who get it wrong - even then, the returning officer will always try to let a vote count if it's obvious what was intended. But, at present, for those who want to complain about feeling disenfranchised, a spoilt papers is the way to announce it.
In my ideal of compulsory voting I would insist on a 'none of the above' option.
Maybe it would be a good idea to start a new party and call it "None of the Above". I think it would walk the next election with no canvassing.
 
I have said before that the centre left parties need to agree a deal to change the voting system once and for all. Bring forward legislation to scrap the first past the post system followed by a general election under the new system
I agree massively in favour of PR but it does have it flaws UKIP a few years ago would have won many seats not none.
 
Only in your warped mind- voted lib dem in the last general election.
nothing warped about my mind. Some-one who has used the communist avatar and quoted extrenist antifa material might try to pretend in this facade of yours that you are a centre left but the truth which for reasons you would not like to come out is abundantly clear.
 
Nothing wrong in believing in better conditions for the poorest in society, or believing that all human beings deserve to have rights to fair treatment regardless of nationality, or that the tax system should be fair and progressive and fund public services adequately. And once again, if you are not an antifascist what are you?
I still don't think you have ever criticised posters for using extreme right websites posting or denounced as racism calling Africans Picanninnies?
Who is the extremist again?
 
Nothing wrong in believing in better conditions for the poorest in society, or believing that all human beings deserve to have rights to fair treatment regardless of nationality, or that the tax system should be fair and progressive and fund public services adequately. And once again, if you are not an antifascist what are you?
I still don't think you have ever criticised posters for using extreme right websites posting or denounced as racism calling Africans Picanninnies?
Who is the extremist again?
you are
 
I agree massively in favour of PR but it does have it flaws UKIP a few years ago would have won many seats not none.
You couldn't find anyone who is less of a UKIP voter than me but if PR gave them a load of seats so be it. The people who are into UKIP would have been listened to, the people that UKIP put into parliament would have been shown up for what they are, at the next election people would be more inclined to get out and vote to get rid of UKIP.
To summarise PR might not give you what you want, it might from time to time let some undesirables into Westminster but it would always be more representative of the peoples vote.
 
Just a quick look at the results in numbers voting for each political party tells you that this country is evenly split between centre right and centre left, so all this triumphant bollocks about being a Conservative country is exactly that...bollocks. The issue is that if you are centre right, there is one party that represents your views. Centre left and there's 3. There will have to be a coalition next election and deals done in various constituencies if we are to get shut if this lot.
 
Last edited:
The Tories will remain in power for a long time I can see them dumping Johnson before the next election
and bringing in someone who looks more acceptable to the electorate.
 
Just a quick look at the results in numbers voting for each political party tells you that this country us evenly split between centre right and centre left, so all this triumphant bollocks about being a Conservative country is exactly that...bollocks. the issue is that if you away centre right, there is one party that represents your views. Centre left and there's 3. There will have to be a coalition next election and deals done in various constituencies if we are to get shut if this lot.

If the majority do want "shut of this lot" then you won't have to do anything, they will get voted out.
 
The Tories will remain in power for a long time I can see them dumping Johnson before the next election
and bringing in someone who looks more acceptable to the electorate.

ADS

You could be right in what you say but I'm thinking that some might argue that appeal to the electorate is something that Boris has ?
 
If the majority do want "shut of this lot" then you won't have to do anything, they will get voted out.
Not with the system we have now, 60% can vote across a good number of parties, the Torys maintain their solid 40% concentrated vote and with first past the post they win.
The system is a throwback to the days of the local squire being the MP, I think most western democracies employ some form of PR these days.
A government formed from the best people in all the parties would create a more united country where the people might get something closer to what they want.
I'd seriously take a look at the world of Lobbying as well if we truly want government to represent the nation and not be too heavily influenced by multinational companies and billionaires.
 
You've not read a word I wrote have you?

South Shore

I read every word you wrote.

I'm just not interested in your quest for electoral reform.

Thankfully AVFTT is not a very good reflection of public opinion, not all of us want Cat as the Prime Minister, Wiz as the Chancellor and Lytham as the Home Secretary.

Sorry Coppice but you lack the integrity to be a politician.
 
Labour should sent a representative out to America and talk to the people who rigged the election out there. Probably their only chance.
 
Back
Top