Macseasider
Well-known member
It's super overcast. Loads for the England bowlers. If we can get 250 we are very much still in the game.
Taken Australia 30 minutes after lunch to get the ball swinging, we're going to have it going as soon as possible. Can't have Australia for 0 or 1 at close.It's super overcast. Loads for the England bowlers. If we can get 250 we are very much still in the game.
4 wickets for 28 runsAbsolute disaster day after some utterly shambolic bowling by the Aussies for the first hour.
Unfortunately we have several on here that aren't though.I don't think anyone in their right mind thinks we're out of it.
Dunno until they've batted innit.All out 283.
The last 7 wickets fell for just 99 runs which is very poor from England.
13 short of the 296 we scored against them in 2019. We do need to make these conditions work in our favour with the ball. With the weather looking a little better tomorrow, we need to have a good couple of hours.Valuable runs at the end. Let's see how the Aussies fare.
It’s still poor though losing 7 wickets for less than 100 runs.Dunno until they've batted innit.
Happens though?It’s still poor though losing 7 wickets for less than 100 runs.
Several top order batsman under achieved today namely Root, Stokes, Bairstow.
It does granted.Happens though?
I remember a time when we'd lose all our wickets for less than 100.It’s still poor though losing 7 wickets for less than 100 runs.
Several top order batsman under achieved today namely Root, Stokes, Bairstow.
Of course it’s far from over but you’d think we need a wicket or two before close of play tonight.
Why shouldn't have they been 2 up?Cheer up we've just taken the first wicket. Warner gone.
Edit. Got to admit it feels a little flat after the weather ruined the OT test. But the Aussies shouldn't have been 2 up in the first place & ultimately it gave us a mountain to climb.
And Aus would be 4-0 up if they had Lyon........It's been a great series. The fact we're arguing about who deserves the victories is testament to that.
I've found it rivetting. I just want Jimmy to get a break. We'd have won if Leach had been fit.
We'll, there is that.And Aus would be 4-0 up if they had Lyon........
Yeah maybe, but that doesn't alter the fact he has a head like a Smash robot.And Aus would be 4-0 up if they had Lyon........
Are you forgetting in the first two Tests Wood and Woakes wasn't there?And Aus would be 4-0 up if they had Lyon........
No chance of that. It's hubris all the way for Baz. They have got several things right amongst the errors, not least allowing players to express themselves. But when you listen to them talk its like some quasi religious cult.Once again the absence of Ben Foakes is killing us, when are Baz and Stokes going to admit they got it wrong and should have played Foakes?
Without question for me the main reason the Ashes are on their way back to Oz. It's the equivalent of not playing your best goalkeeper in football, Bairstow will never be as good as Foakes with the gloves and his missed catches and stumpings are killers in close matches. I wouldnt mind but Foakes first class is almost 40 whilst Bairstow's is 43, so he's no slouch with the bat either.
For me Bazball management team should hold their hands up and admit they've got it wrong and select Foakes for the next Test series.
How does Eng ** up in selection work both ways?Are you forgetting in the first two Tests Wood and Woakes wasn't there?
Plus we've had no Archer from the start and Ollie Pope also got injured and is out for the series.
And don't get me started on Ben Foakes non selection.
Works both ways pal.
Yep, got to agree with you, bizarre decisionOnce again the absence of Ben Foakes is killing us, when are Baz and Stokes going to admit they got it wrong and should have played Foakes?
Without question for me the main reason the Ashes are on their way back to Oz. It's the equivalent of not playing your best goalkeeper in football, Bairstow will never be as good as Foakes with the gloves and his missed catches and stumpings are killers in close matches. I wouldnt mind but Foakes first class average is almost 40 whilst Bairstow's is 43, so he's no slouch with the bat either.
For me Bazball management team should hold their hands up and admit they've got it wrong and select Foakes for the next Test series.
I wouldn't be surprised if the pick Foakes for the India tour. Keeping to spin and all of that.No chance of that. It's hubris all the way for Baz. They have got several things right amongst the errors, not least allowing players to express themselves. But when you listen to them talk its like some quasi religious cult.
They'd need a spinner who could spin it for that. Leach won't spin it enough to confuse Indians at home.I wouldn't be surprised if the pick Foakes for the India tour. Keeping to spin and all of that.
They have to select Foakes (without a doubt in my mind) instead of Bairstow as 'keeper purely because I'd always choose the best for that position which is also the fulcrum of the fielding team.Once again the absence of Ben Foakes is killing us, when are Baz and Stokes going to admit they got it wrong and should have played Foakes?
Without question for me the main reason the Ashes are on their way back to Oz. It's the equivalent of not playing your best goalkeeper in football, Bairstow will never be as good as Foakes with the gloves and his missed catches and stumpings are killers in close matches. I wouldnt mind but Foakes first class average is almost 40 whilst Bairstow's is 43, so he's no slouch with the bat either.
For me Bazball management team should hold their hands up and admit they've got it wrong and select Foakes for the next Test series.
I'll rephrase that, I mean there's two sides to that story not it works both ways, in other words Oz are not the only side to be affected by injury and specifically to Nathan Lyon, we have had more than our fair share too. Imagine Wood and Archer steaming in at 90mph plus all the series and also not losing Pope to injury? Throw in us picking Foakes as wicket keeper from day one and I reckon we piss this series and the urn stays in BlightyHow does Eng ** up in selection work both ways?
That works one way only.
tbh has the bowling dept let them down that much? A bit bland and samey early in the series and Wood was OK to play in at least the 2nd test, but apart from Anderson the bowlers have done individually OK. Archer is more interested in T20 and hurting batters than actual test cricket- I'd be surprised to see him again unless there's a gaping hole in his schedule (the Ashes were a high profile lifting for him).I'll rephrase that, I mean there's two sides to that story not it works both ways, in other words Oz are not the only side to be affected by injury and specifically to Nathan Lyon, we have had more than our fair share too. Imagine Wood and Archer steaming in at 90mph plus all the series and also not losing Pope to injury? Throw in us picking Foakes as wicket keeper from day one and I reckon we piss this series and the urn stays in Blighty
Well that's my opinion. It's been small margins (cliché of the moment) & this test is not over yet.Why shouldn't have they been 2 up?
If you don't take your chances you don't deserve to win.
Aus have put 5 down today and realistically Eng could have been ao for 160ish. But they didn't and Eng weren't.
You could argue that catches etc are down to anything but luck, whereas conditions are purely down to luck and Aus have had the worse of those.
Just a boring team aren't they? We should have beaten them 4-0 and it's our own fault.Australia scored 21 runs in the first hour. It may be a way of avoiding defeat, but as they've retained the ashes and are world champions in the test format one would have thought they'd have a bit more confidence in themselves and basic pride to try harder than this.