King Billy
Well-known member
And from Pringles wording he doesn’t.Your welching plain and simple, when you threw the qauntlet down there was no mention of exchanging bank details. From your wording of the bet you owe Pringle £200.
And from Pringles wording he doesn’t.Your welching plain and simple, when you threw the qauntlet down there was no mention of exchanging bank details. From your wording of the bet you owe Pringle £200.
Yet your fellow supporter had already welchedYour changing the rules to suit your own failings. Your the one that stated NO WELCHING.
The technicality conveniently being no bank details exchanged and being a no show, again conveniently till he won?The bet was lost and trying to get out on a technicality is not cricket!
He lost the bet .... end of!The technicality conveniently being no bank details exchanged and being a no show, again conveniently till he won?
You can’t have a bet where one ‘anonymous’ bloke picks or chooses whether he tips back up or not based upon the result.The bet was lost and trying to get out on a technicality is not cricket!
I’ll tell you what how about I imprint the wording into your foreheadRead the wording of the bet. YOU ** **.
Just your opinionYou can’t have a bet where one ‘anonymous’ bloke picks or chooses whether he tips back up or not based upon the result.
It’s the most ridiculous thing ever ffs
Nah not having it. Your clearly not a mug when it comes to money but how you can justify this is pretty astounding tbhHe lost the bet .... end of!
Dream onI’ll tell you what how about I imprint the wording into your forehead
I just believe a bet is a bet, and if you start the process by saying 'no welching' it's a bit much to welch.Nah not having it. Your clearly not a mug when it comes to money but how you can justify this is pretty astounding tbh
Do one you pussy….you’re mate is taking the pies and so are you.Dream on
Aye fair enoughI just believe a bet is a bet, and if you start the process by saying 'no welching' it's a bit much to welch.
Anyway, let's agree to disagree as we are going round in circles
Spot on. The bet was not offered on the premise of the bank details being exchanged.Your welching plain and simple, when you threw the qauntlet down there was no mention of exchanging bank details. From your wording of the bet you owe Pringle £200.
FFS some people need to learn to readilk take that bet lasher no welshing swap bank details towards end of season and loser sends money
Really?Spot on. The bet was not offered on the premise of the bank details being exchanged.
You owe the knobber £200
No, but it was offered on the basis that they wouldn’t welch.Spot on. The bet was not offered on the premise of the bank details being exchanged.
You owe the knobber £200
How about sending the money to a charity instead. You know it's the honourable thing to do.FFS some people need to learn to read
TOWARDS THE END OF THE SEASON
his rules not mine,I said on here 6 days ago bank details by Friday, that’s 1 day before the end of the season,after the game was finished it became after the end of the season
Perhaps some people can’t be bothered reading up the thread but if they can’t then don’t bother making things up
The bloke’s a complete chancer mate. He’d have been on here as promised if he had any intention of fulfilling the agreement you both made.Really?
Read above!
Just to be awkward and a mild technical point as people are trying to use them....FFS some people need to learn to read
TOWARDS THE END OF THE SEASON
his rules not mine,I said on here 6 days ago bank details by Friday, that’s 1 day before the end of the season,after the game was finished it became after the end of the season
Perhaps some people can’t be bothered reading up the thread but if they can’t then don’t bother making things up
Now now, no need for calling anyone a ** or pussy. If it was Pringle who lost he would be getting the sam abuse. By the way I have no idea who Pringle is.Do one you pussy….you’re mate is taking the pies and so are you.
You can’t have a bet with an invisible man
It’s probably you by the way you’re going on about it.Now now, no need for calling anyone a ** or pussy. If it was Pringle who lost he would be getting the sam abuse. By the way I have no idea who Pringle is.
I will bet you a million quid, but your not getting my details. Sorry , couldn’t resist a bit of humour.It’s probably you by the way you’re going on about it.
And I called you a ** because you’re wading in on my fellow supporter and abusing him, when it’s Pringle who’s totally out of line.
I’ve watched GB trying to get this sorted (as they both agreed) for a while now.
From Pringles perspective he’s effectively made the classic “end of the world” bet
“I’ll bet you a million quid the end of the world doesn’t happen next week”
How is this weapon allowed to post this shite on here, cmon Basil you bin me every week for lessRead the wording of the bet. YOU ** **.
If I want to send money to a charity that’s up to me,it certainly won’t be anything to do with bet that the nobber decided to do a disappearing act on pre kick offHow about sending the money to a charity instead. You know it's the honourable thing to do.
I was just warned for using ** and advised to use ** insteadHow is this weapon allowed to post this shite on here, cmon Basil you bin me every week for less
I didn't make any bets but I'd never welch on it if I did.If I want to send money to a charity that’s up to me,it certainly won’t be anything to do with bet that the nobber decided to do a disappearing act on pre kick off
How about you send money to a charity,£10 for each ridiculous word you’ve just typed
That depends… If the arrangement that the pair of you settle on is that bank detsils will be exchanged, then that’s the deal that both parties need to honour.The one thing learnt from this is if a bet is to be taken bank details need to be agreed and swapped before the bet comes into play otherwise the bet will not be alloed to go forward. As for whether the bet was lost or void, I know what my feeling oin that are.
I didn't make any bets but I'd never welch on it if I did.
Nice one Pringle it’ll be good doing business with you!
You really are thick- try & understand, he never contacted me from just before the start of the season but did after the final whistle, he wouldn’t answer pm”s & any correspondence was only from me, pm or on this thread for anyone to see,also I was non aggressive with all my posts to him, all I asked was to go by the rules he set ( as above)ilk take that bet lasher no welshing swap bank details towards end of season and loser sends money
Technically the season is not over though, still five games to go.You really are thick- try & understand, he never contacted me from just before the start of the season but did after the final whistle, he wouldn’t answer pm”s & any correspondence was only from me, pm or on this thread for anyone to see,also I was non aggressive with all my posts to him, all I asked was to go by the rules he set ( as above)
This is becoming very tedious.
Wowee...Read the wording of the bet. YOU ** **.
The lady doth protest too muchNow now, no need for calling anyone a ** or pussy. If it was Pringle who lost he would be getting the sam abuse. By the way I have no idea who Pringle is.
So would you my friend if you had been cheated out of £200 . No wonder Pringle is subdued.The lady doth protest too much
Just log back in as him, job done you simpletonSo would you my friend if you had been cheated out of £200 . No wonder Pringle is subdued.
Actually... 'Technically' the season is over and ended today... The Play Off's take place after the season has ended.Technically the season is not over though, still five games to go.
So if he sends the details now he has complied by your definition.
Again your opinion.Actually... 'Technically' the season is over and ended today... The Play Off's take place after the season has ended.
Random username cheated out of 200 quid, despite not turning up to finalise the bet with real details. I've heard it all now.So would you my friend if you had been cheated out of £200 . No wonder Pringle is subdued.
Why do people get so emotional over a bet, it's not like in person where you might shake on it.A bets a bet as i was told by my father. Who ever lost just pay ffs simple. Can argue the toss all day but the person who doesn't pay is a arsehole end of..
He’s not arguing a ‘technicality’ at all.Again your opinion.
The EFL call today the end of the Championship REGULAR season.
He is arguing a technicality not to pay - I am just saying there are other ways to look at it if you are going to be that anal to welch on a bet.
It's all arguable as we are proving
Hey, I’ve told you I’m not Pringle. That I swear on my grandkids lives.Just log back in as him, job done you simpleton
It is up for debate, otherwise why are you debating?He’s not arguing a ‘technicality’ at all.
The terms that they settled on are an absolutely fundamental condition of the agreement. Graham opened negotiations with an offer of a bet and then they settled the terms on which they agreed to proceed (those terms in their entirety are the agreement between the parties)
Had Pringle not suggested that they would swap details before the season ended (which it has) (and that’s not my opinion, it a material fact), then Graham may well have sought some other mechanism to ensure nobody could just ‘disappear’.
Pringle literally signed up on the 17th June 2021, wrote one line (which specified that they would swap details before season end and then never said another thing)… Graham accepted those terms.
Graham has then tried to contact Pringle to resolve and give him the opportunity to finslise the arrangements as they agreed.
It’s not even up for debate ….
The season is over, all games played that affect the table which is what the bet is based on, finishing higher.Again your opinion.
The EFL call today the end of the Championship REGULAR season.
He is arguing a technicality not to pay - I am just saying there are other ways to look at it if you are going to be that anal to welch on a bet.
It's all arguable as we are proving
No, but it was offered on the basis that they wouldn’t welch.
The ONLY possible way you can make that agreement ‘official’ is by an exchange of details.
Which is precisely what the two of them went on to agree. In fact the deal they settled on was that n the basis of details being exchanged (BEFORE) the end of the season.
That did not happen, so the bet is void….as the agreement they reached was not fulfilled by the knobber.
He knew he’d agreed to exchange details before now… you don’t forget that…. He’d not forgot to come on today had he?
The knobber is a shyster…. Waited till he won and then came on. Has he lost we’d have never heard from him again
By contrast GB has been on here (when Preston were ahead) chasing the knobber to complete the agreement!!!