Agree, but I fear we don't have the players.Nope, we haven't got anyone who can, we'd be better playing 3 up front and interchanging with an attacking midfielder behind them an 2 midfielders behind that and a back 4 and the full backs able to push up.
Agree, but I fear we don't have the players.
I've said before MA may be forced to play a bit more defensive than we'd hoped. And perhaps Quitbitch did so for that reason.
Tin hat. Bowler is too slow in release in a dynamic front 3.All down to who we get in. The loans could be absolutely crucial. Mind you a front 3 of Bowler, Yates & Lavery may be decent?
CJ? Apter?Tin hat. Bowler is too slow in release in a dynamic front 3.
CJ should get a chance to fail. If he does, then, shrug, he was given the chance. Quitbitch didn't give him that.CJ? Apter?
So is Anderson. Would a middle 3 of Dougall, Carey, and Connelly with a front 3 of Hamilton, Yates and Dale be worth a go?Tin hat. Bowler is too slow in release in a dynamic front 3.
Sorry but if CJ is the answer then we're fucked. He simply isn't good enough for this level and showed it time and time again last year. He gets away with his race pace in League One.So is Anderson. Would a middle 3 of Dougall, Carey, and Connelly with a front 3 of Hamilton, Yates and Dale be worth a go?
If we sold Bowler and Anderson it might be possible to get a couple of players better than those we currently have.
But getting back to the original point both Bowler and Anderson are guilty of keeping hold of the ball for too long instead of playing a quick pass at the right time.
They are probably two of the players that I was thinking we could upgrade on the back of Bowler and Anderson going.Sorry but if CJ is the answer then we're fucked. He simply isn't good enough for this level and showed it time and time again last year. He gets away with his race pace in League One.
But if we're heading into a new Championship season with those two on the wings, we might as well start looking at League One away days.
Maybe - if he stops falling to the grass as soon as he gets the slightest touch!I wouldn’t call Jamie Vardy a physical lad but he plays the lone striker role brilliantly for Leicester. I can seriously see Lavery playing that same type of role.
I was saying that too. Maybe a support man, because he can run well with the ball and make space.I think Yates can. Lavery would be much better starting from wide.
Remember when I saw Lavery attempt that role last season and he really struggled. No physicality and our inability to play a ball from midfield in the end was our undoing.Nope ! Not physical enough