(unless it goes their way of course 
).
Not strictly true as the Referendum wasn't legally binding but advisory. But carry on bashing one out.Well, well, well, who'd have thought it - the orange faced loon and the Remainer lobby could be soulmates
Petulant brats who refuse to accept the outcome of a legally binding democratic vote
had the UK taken the position that âwe asked you the question, donât like your answer and we are ignoring the result/going to ask you again in a few yearsâ in that very European superstate way they have on the continent, it would have been uprising territory and further entrenched Brexit views. Brexit ref 2 would have been catastrophic for those wanting to remain and probably end up in an absolute landslide for out under those circs and plenty of civil unrest to boot. Pointless.
Still not legally binding.
But itâs practically binding under the circumstances. No Prime Minister would attempt to reverse the outcome of a referendum in the UK. Itâs always those who concern themselves greatly with the âlies of politiciansâ that seem to advocate non implementation of referendum results!
The phrase legally binding was used. It wasn't. It was a consultative exercise.
True & in the hope of not losing votes to Ukip.
You still can't accept the result of a democratic referendum can you?
I dont have an issue with the result. I do have an issue with people retrospectively telling me it was binding. It was never that. It was a referendum. As I understand it, we elect representatives to Parliament to make decisions on our behalf. We don't have the power to tell them what to do on each and every vote.
Of course you have an issue with the result. You have an issue accepting it. The rest of your post tells us that. Binding or not, is immaterial and shows that you don't accept it. You have frequently posted your views on how you think we will negatively be impacted by Brexit.
As heâs perfectly entitled to do. The referendum was about leaving the EU. It wasnât about taking away free speech.
They donât WANT it to be a disaster. Theyâre just warning, as they have been consistently, that it almost certainly will be.
And youâre continually criticising democratically elected MPs who arenât Tories. But seem to think people donât have the right to criticise the outcome of the referendum.
Nonsense. At the first sign of a settlement or a new trade deal the usual suspects are on to it like a pack of hyenas, you more than most.
Of course I have the right to criticise elected MP's, so does anybody. You obviously haven't taken notice but I've criticised both sides. But I accept democracy. That's the difference.
Not really.
You could have fooled me. Any slightest little thing goes wrong, as Tangojoe rightly points out, you and others are on it like a pack of hyenas. You positively revel in it.
How can you claim to accept democracy if you still criticise democratically elected MPs?
So weâve now moved to discussing the issue to making personal attacks. Playing the man; not the ball.
Luckily I've you as a role model on how to accept a contrary view to my own.
What's personal about it?
Correct and in that idea of free speech I'm perfectly entitled to point out that people like yourself and Wiz seem not to accept the result. I've no doubt you'd vigorously campaign for a new referendum if it was to be mooted again. You lost get over it. You lost the argument back then, you've lost it now. Accept it move on and try to have a positive outlook about the future of our country outside of the EU..
Of course you are entitled to your opinion. And Iâm entitled to mine.
Or alternatively Iâve got them leaping into the keepnetCrikey Mex, you've got yourself into a right little mess haven't you. Looks like another majority decision against you. Better just accept you're in the wrong and move on
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
Well take it as a compliment then. Rather than being your usual sarcastic self.
Thanks O/P for confirming that not only did people not have a clue what they were voting for, they didn't even know what having a referendum meant.Well, well, well, who'd have thought it - the orange faced loon and the Remainer lobby could be soulmates
Petulant brats who refuse to accept the outcome of a legally binding democratic vote
Yet more nonsense from the Oyston supporter. Another fine example of how pompous, self righteous remainers think all Brexit voters are stupid.
Clearly you have an issue with people contradicting your interpretation of reality.
After all these years you still seem utterly obsessed by Oyston. He must keep you awake at night. You should really be called RustyMemory because you still seem to mix up my advocation for prudence in football with your fantasy of Oyston.
I was obsessed by Oyston? Now that is rich. I just don't forget how gullible fools like you were taken in by them, when the rest of the world could see what was happening. That's why any opinion you have is taken with a very large dose of salt.
How pompous and self righteous you are to say that. You've built up an entire fantasy in your mind and to be honest I quite enjoy going along with it just to see how gullible you can be.
As do you. Easy this game innit. Four years of constant whingeing. That's your reality.
I well remember when so many of your fellow Pool supporters sacrificed so much to try and rid the club of the Oystons. How the Oystons literally ruined the lives of quite a few of those supporters, one or two I know personally. But all along you continued to support them and that disgusts me as much today as it did then.
You're so convinced by your long standing fantasy it's probably best I make you my first ever ignore list poster. Whilst in the past it's been mildly amusing to see your imagination play out, you've become boring nowadays, always running out of things to say on a topic and just reverting to your parrot fashion cliché so no point in wasting any more time now this board has the technology to bypass such drivel.
One thing that isn't a fantasy is your support for the Oystons. That's well documented. Feel free to hit the ignore button, a sure sign you've lost the debate.
Questionable logic there, Rusty
Allez is definitely the main man when it comes to debating. Food that is
Still, makes for a bit of banter eh.
In a democracy a majority can still be wrong, even if it carries the day.Crikey Mex, you've got yourself into a right little mess haven't you. Looks like another majority decision against you. Better just accept you're in the wrong and move on
Is there a right and wrong though? Surely it's down to opinion?
