Yea if you’re Stevie Wonder….Not really possible to see if the entire ball is over the line from that angle.
You could be Eagle Eye Action Man, but it’s still not possible to say that the whole ball is over the line from that angle.Yea if you’re Stevie Wonder….
Never had him.. was he good ?You could be Eagle Eye Action Man, but it’s still not possible to say that the whole ball is over the line from that angle.
Not bad… I preferred ‘Talking Commander’Never had him.. was he good ?
Not in Lge 1 and 2 the irony being we had it last season.I thought all Referees had these watches that ‘buzz’ when the ball goes into goal?
It was well over. The body language of the NT players confirms they thought it was over.Ball was well over the line and the lino about 20 yards short of where he should have been. Typically poor officiating yet again!
Really? He should have been in line with the last defender. From that picture, he was!Ball was well over the line and the lino about 20 yards short of where he should have been. Typically poor officiating yet again!
yep, as i said earlier it looked over but even if it is, it's not by much with the arc of the ball. So yes, can't blame the ref or lino.Really? He should have been in line with the last defender. From that picture, he was!
No fault of the lino or ref. Goal line technology would have helped obviously.
You win some, you lose some. We seem to lose more than win though!
Wasn't Talking Commander the one with the shit radio and the aerial came out of his head?Not bad… I preferred ‘Talking Commander’
I think there were a few versions…Wasn't Talking Commander the one with the shit radio and the aerial came out of his head?
Action Man was almost as crap as Subbuteo.
it's not adjacent to square five at all. That picture is taken from behind the goal and so in a direct line from camera to ball yes you go thru square five to the ball. But the key to this is seeing an angle square [adjacent] on and that's what we don't have/see. But the nearer to square on you get the squares come down, ie 4 then 3, then 2 etc.If you count the squares of the side netting from the goal line to where the ball is. The ball is adjacent to square 5. Definitely over the line. It’s like that goal that udders scored last season and wasn’t given. They had goal line tech as well. Still not given.
Did he look like Ollie Norburn?Not bad… I preferred ‘Talking Commander’
Heretic!Wasn't Talking Commander the one with the shit radio and the aerial came out of his head?
Action Man was almost as crap as Subbuteo.
Yep, it blurred and lost some of his facial features, classic giveaway.Goalies face says it’s over
Action Man or Subbuteo?Heretic!
Both but Subbuteo particularly.Action Man or Subbuteo?
Subbuteo took ages to set up with bloody fences and the like then five minutes in to playing you realised it was complete toss and no one knew the rules anyway.
They couldn't even be arsed making an individual BFC set, cheapskates.
Just opinions I guess. He looks flat footed and too far back for me. Should’ve been expecting the ball to head that way and ready to make a decision.Really? He should have been in line with the last defender. From that picture, he was!
No fault of the lino or ref. Goal line technology would have helped obviously.
You win some, you lose some. We seem to lose more than win though!